Intelligent Design Vs Big Bang Theory

1341 Words 6 Pages
Answering where everything in the world comes from, including human beings, is a perplexing question that has been thought about for centuries. Today, there are two answers to this question; one is founded in religion, and another in science. Scientists have developed the theory of Evolution to answer how all species come into being, and the theory of the Big Bang to answer how the universe itself came into being. The theory of Evolution came from Charles Darwin and other biologists. It states that species evolve over thousands of years through the process of natural selection. The Big Bang is the theory that the universe exploded from an infinite point of energy. Religion, Christianity to be specific, believes in the theory of intelligent …show more content…
For science, God is not required to explain any phenomena and that there isn’t a purpose for the creation of things. Everything that created is therefore created because of random chance, as opposed to something creating it with a specific design or purpose in mind. For intelligent design, God created the universe and everything in it, and God intervenes in nature frequently and indefinitely. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a fundamental conflict between science and religion. This is due to the contradiction between the divine truth and the scientific truth. Intelligent design says that it is not compatible with science because if the divine truth is indeed true, then science is wrong and therefore not needed. On the other hand, science says the truth can only be reached through research. That is, everything can be logically explained through a qualitative and quantitative …show more content…
To say that he causes things in the same way things are caused in nature is a misunderstanding of what God is. This comes from the fact that creation is an ambiguous term. It has two meanings. One is how it applies to nature, and one is how it applies to God creating nature itself. Creation in nature is a type of change because it involves one thing changing its form into another form. Divine creation, however, is not a type of change. Religion is false in explaining the creation of nature as opposed to creation in nature. God is not in nature because God is not a natural thing. It is not correct to think of God in a natural way by assuming his actions or attributes are natural. Therefore, it is perfectly fine, per Tkacz, to say that nothing is created out of nothing. The confusion between creation of nature and creation in nature is part of the cosmogonical fallacy which is what intelligent design is founded

Related Documents