Compare And Contrast Thomas Paine Vs Guevara

Superior Essays
The viewpoints of both Thomas Paine and Che Guevara had some common principles. Both men left their own countries to join in Revolutions in other countries. Paine left Britain to join the French Revolution as well as take part in the United States Revolution. Likewise, Guevara left Argentina, to join the Cuban Revolution. Both Revolutionists wanted to overthrow systems of government to transform the type of government, however, they had different views on the governmental changes to take place after the Revolution. Paine was in pursuit of a Republican transformation while Guevara was in favor of a global Communist Revolution. Although Paine and Guevara both wanted a revolution, this idea was not always the best or most efficient way to achieve …show more content…
He was a firm believer in egalitarianism, the belief that all people are equal with respect to social, political, and economic affairs. (Merriam-Webster). He supported social security for the workers and public employment for those in need of work. He also fought for the abolition of laws limiting wages. During the French Revolution, Paine made it a point to be understood that the Revolution was against the laws and principles, and not against the French king. Paine wanted social change, not political power. One weakness in Paine's argument was that he believed a total Revolution would be needed for any changes to take place, while a total Revolution was not always necessary for change. However one of Paine's strengths was his concept of natural rights. His concept of natural rights brought upon the formation of civil rights. Another strength of his was his participation in the reformation of the English government regarding things such as the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, a national budget, lower taxes, and subsidized …show more content…
As stated previously, the guerrilla fighters saw themselves as social reformers and believed they were fighting for a movement so the people could get the social changes they so desired. This proved to be a successful plan for the Guerrillas because so many people were against the current government and wanted change. This desire for change by the people sparked the Cuban Revolution. Although Guerrilla warfare was successful in Cuba, Guevara's plans to cause a global uprising failed because they did not have enough Civilian support. This proved that without the support of the population there is no war to be

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Mahatmas Gandhi and Maximilien Robespierre are similar and different from each other as a result of both being killed by their own people. And as a result of Maximilien Robespierre tried to eliminate religion while Mahatmas Gandhi wanted the religions to cooperate with each other. Also, Mahatmas Gandhi and Maximilien Robespierre’s actions did not concur. Furthermore, Mahatmas Gandhi and Maximilien Robespierre are similar and different from each other One similarity of Mahatmas Gandhi and Maximilien Robespierre were that both were killed by their own people.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He used analogies such as, “We may as well assert that a child has thrived upon milk, that it is to never have meat…” (#31; p. 98) Having used a language that the general knew broadened his audience, and therefore expanded his influence. Paine had the advantage of having had the same thoughts as the Patriots who wanted independence. With the majority of the colonists being Patriots, Paine’s argument may have been what finally made fence-sitters choose a side.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine had many similar motives to those of Patrick Henry. Paine wrote to encourage colonists to fight for their independence. Many American colonists disliked the king, they disliked his taxes, and they disliked his power he had over their lives. In Paine’s pamphlet, “Common Sense”, he said “But where, say some, is the king of America? I will tell you, he reigns above, and doth not make havoc of mankind like the royal brute of Great Britain.”…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In summary, being seen as a rebel trying to fight off Britain, or a person seeking their well-deserved independence can be the difference in allies, in trust, and in the time it takes to get what you were originally out for. The point intended here was freedom. Paine openly admits that Britain is a very free society, but with his philosopher-like thinking, he felt like we could refine our Colonies to find our own independence aside from what Britain’s input is. Freedom comes with restraint though. Government agrees sweetly with the simple acts of independence and assures that chaos does not run amuck in society.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead, the people on the land would form a society to teach other how to develop the land. Society as a substitute for a government could have persuaded individuals in the New World with no prior knowledge of ruining a colony except previous government styles from England. By outlining the mistakes and consequences Britain experienced a government rule, Paine intended to show examples of what European powers and government would do in the New World. He continued to examine the European constitution with three major flaws in the system. The first points show two flaws; monarchical and aristocratical tyranny.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He compares the colonies with a child, he states that, “…because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat…” (Paine 19). His reason for saying this is because some believed that since America had prospered under Britain’s rule in order for it to remain this way it must remain under its control. His response to this idea however is that this is not true and that maybe America could have better results if it did not have Britain controlling it. Another metaphor that he uses is comparing the declaration of Independence to a business man.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the eighteenth century, America was fed up with the British empire and thought they deserved their freedom. Although Thomas Paine and Charles Inglis both had good arguments and logical reason, Paine had a patriotic vision on why America would be better off as an independent nation that Charles Inglis did not see. Paine's argument consists of his views reconciliation, preventing war, and even the downside of independance from Britian. To describe the possible alliance between the British and Americans, Paine uses the word “Reconciliation”.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was a deist, which means he believed in God but he did not believe in Christ. Paine combined religion with science. He believed that there were scientific answers for all that the Bible and Christians believed. In his writing, “The Age of Reason”, he renounces the stories of the Bible and compares them to “heathen mythology” (pg. 655). He felt that the “Christian theory is little else than the idolatry of the ancient mythologist” (pg.656)…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He really uses common sense when writing to the people about how we need independence and liberty. Which brings to me to another point, individual liberties. I am all for individual rights and freedom, like religion and happiness. Thomas Paine 's arguments were all hard hitting to me, and I agreed with him. He was a lover of his country and he wanted what was best for it, and I think…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common Sense Thesis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He had the idea that, “The vast variety of interests, occasioned by an increase of trade and population, would create confusion. Colony would be against colony.” As fate would have it, the Civil War was triggered by a rapid increase of split public opinion about slavery and federal government control, exactly like Paine suggests. America's second war was also sparked by a lack of unity which, as mentioned earlier, was also something Paine foresaw. He knew that a united nation was imperative for the Revolutionary War and he had the notion that it would be important in years to come.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To Paine, society is everything good that the people can accomplish by joining together. Paine makes it clear that he is not particularly fond of government, whose only purpose is "restraining our vices". One theme throughout this work is Paine’s view of government as a necessary evil. Paine says that government has its origins in the evil of man, and that its sole purpose is to protect life, liberty and property, and that a government should be judged on the extent to which it accomplishes this goal. His reasoning for this is that he feels the “natural state” of man is to live without government, so there should only be government to alleviate the problems of man.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paine also describes why “now” in a past sense is the best time to rebel against Britain. Whereas the “Declaration of Independence” is a couple of paragraphs meant to explain why the American Colonies have the right to separate from the British Crown (rule) and become their own nation. The “Declaration of Independence” only skims over a few topics also mentioned in Paine’s work, and does not go into all that much detail about them (whereas in Paine’s work her did explain these topics in great detail), it is more meant to explain the rights of an American citizen (colonists) and what other rights need to be protected from those whom wish to take what is given by God. It also describes the three things that all Americans have rights too and a duty to uphold (i.e. Equality, Consent, and…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These differences are instrumental in making Henry’s speech more effective. Henry presented his speech on March 23, 1775, which was before the Revolutionary War began whereas Paine wrote months after the war began. Henry’s audience was the Members of the Virginia Convention, top-tier government officials who would be responsible to call for war: “By custom, Henry addressed himself to the Convention’s president, Peyton Randolph of Williamsburg.” Paine, on the other hand, aimed his speech as the American public in general: “I call not upon a few, but upon all.” Henry’s speech was the trigger that sent America into the war.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Initially their similarities, followed by the differences. Concluding with a summary of some main points. I. Thomas Hobbes Both political philosophers, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) have similar ideas in…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the pamphlet, Paine uses moral reference to God, and refers to God as a way to inspire and convince plainly to the colonists the importance of American Revolutionary war against the king and Great Britain. Paine used rational examples to oppose traditional government, specifically the authority of the British government, and tried to convince the colonists the king’s tyrannical actions. He speaks openly about having “little superstition” yet uses God as a reference to connect to the people, and emphasizes how “God Almighty” would not leave the Colonists unsupported from the British “military destruction” (W. W Norton & Company Inc. 648). By contrasting the King as a “murder”, Paine reminds the Colonists the tyrannical, unrighteous actions the King has imposed on the people such as the unfair right to “bind us [America] in all cases whatsoever” as an act similar to that of “slavery” (W. W Norton & Company Inc. 648). Moreover, Paine use of God and religion is more of way to influence the Colonists opinions than act as a sermon to purpose God as shaming or demeaning the cause of the Revolution.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays