In 1776 the Continental Committee was eager in the United States separation from Great Britain, they were expecting for votes to sway there way for this to occur. For reassurance Congress nominated a committee to draw up a declaration of independence. This committee included, John Adams, Robert R. Livingston, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Thomas Jefferson. Out of these designated men, they than selected Thomas Jefferson to go fourth in constructing the draft of the declaration of independence. These founding fathers wrote this declaration as the representation of the United States government. Projecting how ideally the United States should function as a government and its essential duty to all citizens. Massachusetts influenced by
…show more content…
Children had to be brought up with parents until a certain age then they should be sent away to be colonized, for females eighteen and males twenty-one years. Jefferson aligned with modern beliefs that race mixing is dangerous and once made free there would be fusion of black slaves and whites. Thus when made free it is superlative to send slaves to an alternative continent so this idea wouldn’t be attainable. Some historian’s reason that have exclaimed that Jefferson inherently believed that slavery in itself was morally conflicting and didn’t agree with it. Yet others argued against this response exclaiming he did see the positive incentives in owning and selling of slaves, which was an economic strength for America and overall individuals income enhancing. Jefferson was a racist. Historians like Jon Meacham author of “Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power”, professed Jefferson as a hypocrite, but his political views impacted politicians after him. Paul Finkleman professor at Hamline School of Law explains that Jefferson’s personal racism rationalizes the persistence of slavery because he couldn’t contemplate free blacks in his own society. Finkleman expresses that Jefferson was always intensely dedicated to slavery and harbored hostility to blacks both free and enslaved. Furthermore they point out his actions of owning over six-hundred slaves which differed from his words that spoke of freedom and equality for all and emancipation. This essay looks at Jefferson’s hypocrisy, which was his morality set against politics in those times. Observing if he was actually an outright run of the mill racist like majority of whites were or was it merely his conforming to maneuvering alongside a backdrop of ever changing politics of colonization. Even though he played a big factor in supporting
Children had to be brought up with parents until a certain age then they should be sent away to be colonized, for females eighteen and males twenty-one years. Jefferson aligned with modern beliefs that race mixing is dangerous and once made free there would be fusion of black slaves and whites. Thus when made free it is superlative to send slaves to an alternative continent so this idea wouldn’t be attainable. Some historian’s reason that have exclaimed that Jefferson inherently believed that slavery in itself was morally conflicting and didn’t agree with it. Yet others argued against this response exclaiming he did see the positive incentives in owning and selling of slaves, which was an economic strength for America and overall individuals income enhancing. Jefferson was a racist. Historians like Jon Meacham author of “Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power”, professed Jefferson as a hypocrite, but his political views impacted politicians after him. Paul Finkleman professor at Hamline School of Law explains that Jefferson’s personal racism rationalizes the persistence of slavery because he couldn’t contemplate free blacks in his own society. Finkleman expresses that Jefferson was always intensely dedicated to slavery and harbored hostility to blacks both free and enslaved. Furthermore they point out his actions of owning over six-hundred slaves which differed from his words that spoke of freedom and equality for all and emancipation. This essay looks at Jefferson’s hypocrisy, which was his morality set against politics in those times. Observing if he was actually an outright run of the mill racist like majority of whites were or was it merely his conforming to maneuvering alongside a backdrop of ever changing politics of colonization. Even though he played a big factor in supporting