Thomas Hobbes Research Paper

Improved Essays
Thomas Hobbes is a political philosopher known for seeking the philosophical basis of lasting peace. Hobbes is known for his philosophical theories, specifically his social contracts theory. In this paper I will argue how a certain passage from Thomas Hobbes reflects on his main argument of that human beings will never come completely together and agree on how they can all live together.
The passage from Hobbes that I will be responding to says, “Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man; the same is consequent to the time, … and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes 70). After reading this passage I suggest that Hobbes is saying that the citizens of the state
…show more content…
Hobbes suggests specifically that society will function best with a Sovereign, which is best described as the referee of society. The Sovereign’s task is to assure the citizens follow the rules. Referring back to our first lecture on Thomas Hobbes we were shown a quote stating, “The felicity of this life, consisteth not in the repose of a mind satisfied. For there is no such utmost aim, nor greatest good, as is spoken of the books of the old moral philosophers.” This quote supports my acquisition that Hobbes believes that human beings are selfish and work to do things in their best interest as it explains that humans see each other as competition and that they always want to beat the other person. An example of the competition between humans in everyday life would be getting the better parking spot on campus since it is in best interest for yourself to get the parking spot closer to your destination. This quote also means that Hobbes believes that humans are creatures that we have needs that are never fulfilled, as we won’t stop until we get the next best thing. For example, if I got a brand new computer for my birthday, I would be thrilled for the first couple of weeks and then would become less satisfied with it, leading me to want the newest computer. This reflects back to Hobbes main

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The right of nature is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life. ”-Thomas Hobbes… Two strong-minded social contract theorists concluded two different outlooks on several different topics, one main topic being the state of nature. John Locke feels as if peace is and should be the norm, we can and should be able to live in peace without having to worry about someone fondling with our property or belongings. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, feels like everyone isn’t going to agree that certain things are good or bad because that’s based on opinion.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes argues that the sovereign’s power has no limit, as they are responsible for the security and defense of their subjects at whatever cost deemed necessary. He advocated for the monarchy being reinstituted as an absolute authority; it would be the guiding head, or “artificial soul”, of the “artificial man” composed of the commonwealth that is “of greater stature and strength than the natural [man]”. This Leviathan is crucial for the maintenance of peace. Man’s “natural condition” is equal “in the faculties of the body and mind” as what someone lacks in strength they may make up in wits, and they are naturally in competition for gain, safety, and reputation in a state of nature that is innately violent. Hobbes postulates that without “a…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes the source of conflict is self-preservation (p. 9), meaning that even though various causes of conflict appear in the state of nature, the underlying cause of conflict is self-preservation. He believes not only do humans want to survive in the present, but also they want to ensure their survival in the future. In order to survive in the future, humans need resources which leads to violent conflict with others. Hobbes paints a very messy picture of life. He explicitly states the need for a social contract, so that people aren’t always in conflict with one another (p. 13).…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Beliefs

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes believes that it is in man’s nature to be inconsiderate, selfish and greedy. In many instances man always considers the ‘I’ first which is not a wrong thing but in all those cases it is through other people, it can be servants or workers, through which the ‘I’ desires can be fulfilled. Therefore the need to consider other people is then eliminated even before the plans are put to action. ‘we not only have desires and beliefs but also the capacity to evaluate those desires and beliefs’(Daims 2005:27).The author makes it a point that man can do wrong things while in the same time finding it to be unjust. He goes on to describe Man as ‘moral animals’.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, many different countries have had many different governments. Cicero describes several basic forms of political governments such as kingdoms, aristocracy, and democracies. However, Cicero believed that was another kind of government that could could mix all of these ideas together to make a better government, this was called a commonwealth. Thomas Hobbes also talked about a commonwealth, but his ideas were different from Cicero’s. Some have even stated that the United States is not a democratic commonwealth, which seems to be true.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that humans should strive for peace above all things but war is nessesary when lives are threatened. Hobbes does claim that humans in the state of nature are all equals. The state of nature is what Hobbes decribes as a place without any government and caotic. Naturally men exist in a state of equality, where everyone is for themselves.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes argues the man or group of men in power should have the ultimate power to strike fear in humans, and to enforce laws and regulations as needed. That ultimately they are God, the…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes’ maintains humans have a “natural condition,” which may be either blissful or brutish. Given such condition, Hobbes asks, how members of society to act/ought to be. Intuitively many philosophers agree members of a society existing blissfully is not only preferred, but better. And, if we grant what is better for society captures that which is good for a society, then individuals ought to act according to the promotion of this peaceful societal end. One objection to Hobbes comes from whether an individual has the right to opt-out of the contract.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The writings of Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes Although the ideal societies of Machiavelli and Hobbes may have been plausible solutions to political violence in their respective eras, neither man’s ideas translate particularly well to a creating a peaceful society in the present day. In The Leviathan, Hobbes outlines his rationale for creating a society that is ruled by a sovereign (or “Leviathan”) who is given complete power by the people. According to Hobbes, the existence of this all-powerful sovereign prevents sinful human nature from running rampant and destroying peaceful society.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays