Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

Superior Essays
In analyzing the foundations of human behavior, Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, establishes a basis for what he considers a secure, harmonious commonwealth. Reason, by adding and subtracting consequences, offers a fundamental reordering of man’s passions and fears, placing self-preservation as man’s greatest desire and the threat of violent death as man’s greatest fear. In turn, Reason allows man to control and direct his passions. This process is critical to help define the goals of politics and pinpoint the biggest threats to political peace. By means of aversion, man’s appetites, and a sovereign power, Thomas Hobbes scientifically reveals the method in which self-interested individuals use Reason, by means of self-preservation and fear of violent …show more content…
These characteristics assist his exploration of man’s behavior and the profound forces that direct him. Subsequently, Hobbes aspires to exploit these to create an efficient and just commonwealth. Leviathan opens with Hobbes dissecting man’s thought process. A particular impression, deriving from an “external body, or object, which presseth the organ proper to each sense, either immediately, as in the taste and touch, or mediately, as in seeing, hearing and smelling” is the source for what man terms “sense.” For Hobbes, sensation is a natural, a vital and automatic behavior of the body that originates with external sensations that are then transmitted to the brain. Thus, when Hobbes asserts, “dependence upon one another” he means that a man’s thought process stems from a single thought that evolves into a train of thoughts. Ultimately, man’s train of thought transforms as experience and imagination complicates Hobbes’ dissection of man’s thought process. Hobbes characterizes the practice of Reason mathematically, as an adding and subtracting of consequences, resulting in a series of contingencies about a certain the action. Man’s memories are blended with the external sensations from his environment, and generate conclusions that are determined by …show more content…
Hobbes in identifying the three causes of quarrel, states that Glory is “for Reputation… [and]…for trifles, as a word, a smile, a different opinion, and any other sign of undervalue, either direct in their persons, or by reflection in their kindred, their friends, their nation, their profession, or their name.” At first glance, it appears as though Hobbes’ definition of Reason stumbles upon a problem when it comes to man. Yet, Glory, if viewed through a different lens, can be advantageous to the self-interested man in the State of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes makes a few key assumptions about human behavior in the natural world – namely that all men are equal, desire for what is best for oneself, and have the right to do all things in the preservation and improvement of life – in the “the state of nature”. Upon this, he builds his subtractive…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The famous political texts Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke have had a profound impact on what is seen to be the role of government in society, with the latter having more lasting influence, particularly in modern society. The former, in short, argues that men ought to submit themselves and all of their rights to an entity with absolute authority over them, and that no matter how this man, or assembly of men abuses its power, they ought not to resist this entity, as the alternative is a chaotic, violent world. Just by examining the thesis of Hobbes’ work, one would easily deduce that such an idea is contrary to the ideals lauded in our modern society, those being of certain inalienable rights, the rule of law, and the separation/limitation of powers. Locke presents each of these aforementioned ideals and explains them to be essential to governance for the common good.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The views of Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan are exemplified in his views that obedience is key to human salvation, and that war and violence are merely the cause of the nature of man. The contrasting views on freedom show the difference in philosophy, and the contrasting views of violence and nonviolence show the difference in how to achieve such…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison to last week’s readings, I was not very interested/intrigued with The Leviathan or the Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. For this reason being because I had a rather difficult time following Hobbes’ argument and tried to make the best comprehension about what was going on. When comparing Hobbes to previous philosophers that we have knowledge on, I believe that Hobbes was not very focused on the point he was trying to make and tended to jump around throughout the text. However, my comprehension of the argument was that the establishment of commonwealth through social contract could achieve both social unity and civil peace. Thomas Hobbes' idea of commonwealth is dictated by a sovereign power responsible…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his book Leviathan, in 1660, Hobbes wrote about politics and the natural law. Hobbes believed that men have three causes to fight: “First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory”. This led him…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Thomas Hobbes book “The Leviathan” Hobbes has stated how we as humans come to live in society in where we are by nature equal in power, and even the weakest of man can simply scheme to kill the strongest. This is achieved by joining hands with others that are in the same position as the first individual. These aspects according to Hobbs combined with limited resources, and a natural distrust amongst man leads to a “perpetual state of conflict”. Without a common power or government to control man and distribute resources so that there is no need for fighting man live in constant anarchy. We live in constant distrust that is why we have weapons, and that is why we have locks to shield our homes, it is in only in our nature.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli, both grappling with regional instability and constant war, arrive at different frameworks for handling man’s inherent propensity for conflict from very similar models of human behavior. Hobbes, watching his fellow countrymen fight each other during the English Civil War, decided that humans perpetually desire more power to secure their well-being and therefore incline toward warfare as a means to achieve this. Machiavelli, similarly accustomed to the restless Italian Peninsula, also labeled man as power-hungry and self-centered, always striving for enough freedom to ensure one’s prosperity. In the absence of the structure and organization provided by a government, a situation dubbed mankind’s ‘natural…

    • 1255 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper argues that Hobbes’ theory of civil order is made durable by the narrow conception of justice, the appreciation of education, the profound conundrum between Hobbes’ distaste and use of rhetoric and the reconciliation…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intro After reading The Leviathan by Hobbes and the Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses I would argue that the two authors have a similar view on how fear is politically relevant. What makes fear relevant to Machiavelli and Hobbes is that they believe that fear is necessary for a sovereign or a prince to stay in power. The two authors also believe that it is needed to keep the subjects in check and to keep them complacent. Today however there are people who question if fear is politically relevant today.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Anarchism: What It Really Stands For, Emma Goldman states: “Every fool, from king to policeman, from the flatheaded parson to the visionless dabbler in science, presumes to speak authoritatively of human nature”. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, two of the most influential modern philosophers, presumed to speak authoritatively on human nature. They presumed so much so, that each of the philosophers dedicated the bulk of a novel to discussing their interpretation of human nature. In fact, Goldman herself speaks quite extensively on her interpretation of human nature. Hobbes, Locke, and Goldman fit together nicely on the philosophy of human nature spectrum.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The way we would imagine this, is by knowing and understanding the two objects from our past experience. We should know that a unicorn requires a horse and a horn, when we can imagine both things individually, we can start by combining them and then imagine the picture we created. This is the idea of “simple imagination” that Hobbes is trying to explain. Hobbes method of determining human nature seems mathematical based, he seems to a have a formula for everything. The world is always in motion, this shows human are constantly in motion, which means we gain experiences as feelings, we acknowledge that we have endless wants and desires.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes has been coined for planting the first seed of liberalism, but even though he has been credited for it, it is important to notice the aspects of conservatism found in his philosophy. There are four functions that all ideologies follow, including Hobbes’ Leviathan. The first function is the explanation for a political phenomenon. Since it is known that Hobbes wrote at the time of the English Civil War, it was no surprise that he was trying to explain the reason for the war. Hobbes believed, “that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    He thought of man fundamentally as a kind of mechanism, he even thought of state as matter in motion. Against this background, Hobbes developed in Leviathan (1651) a theory of the State, beginning with the assumption that men are by nature self-seeking and hostile toward each other. Yet finding constant hostility intolerable, they form a contract and turn over the enforcement of it to a sovereign power, to which men are thereafter irrevocably bound to be loyal in all circumstances. The State which is subject to rejection is no State at all but only disguised chaos. The purpose of the Leviathan was to expound the basis of human government, in the course of his discussion Hobbes raised many detailed questions about the books of the Bible.…

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fear keeps people from causing conflict, and ultimately leads people to seek peace. On the other hand, reason shows man how to attain this peace. All in all, Hobbes ultimately conveys in the Leviathan that fear is the savior of human life (Hobbes,…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays