What Is The Difference Between Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

Throughout philosophy, there have been many different philosophers with their ideas of how the topic and ideas should be. Two philosophers that have shown this many times are Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Both of them have their ideas and thoughts on the state of nature. What is the state of nature like, and what motives this philosopher to form these ideas, forms or social contracts? In my opinion, I believe that one philosopher have a better point being made, to make sure that there are reasoning and safety between everyone.
State of nature is an idea that uses moral and political philosophy to make laws. As well take into account religion, social contracts, and theories, on how people 's lives should be and what happened before societies were formed. There are types and versions of the social contract theory that the state of nature has no rights mostly freedom.
Thomas Hobbes is an English philosopher; he is known for his political thoughts. What Hobbes thinks about political authority is unreal in the normal condition individuals can lack a form of government. Hobbes claims that it’s okay that you do anything you need to get the things you want or need, even if you have to kill someone or end up in jail. …show more content…
Hobbes thinks that in political philosophy the property rights are an important part. That many sell the land for more common use only that we should share the properties with everyone. There will be competitions for buying and selling the land, but there is no real restrictions or code that the government controls. Everyone use the unclaimed land, but no one can claim it to be there, it’s there for everyone. Another idea is when a person grows too much, there are scarce resources, and you should waste the resources. Many will sell what they have left, by either selling it and make more money, or they will give it away to people or tell them to help themselves to what is