Thomas Hobbes And Jean-Jacques Rousseau's State Of Nature

Improved Essays
The eminent philosopher Thomas Hobbes introduces his interpretation of the state of nature as a place of misery where no law is present, therefore making the citizens ruthless. Man in his state of nature lives in constant fear of death. “The passions that include men to peace are: fear of death; desire of such things as are necessary to commodious living; and hope by their industry to obtain them” (Hobbes 185). People are free to oppress others by claiming what is not theirs, all in the name of pride and reputation. Life in his state of nature is nasty, brutish and short. On the contrary, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s state of nature develops a positive milieu where man is inherently good. Man does not oppress because no property rights are prevalent.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is widely believed by people that the Hunter Gatherers, people who hunt and physically work for their food and resources, 73,000 years ago had bad morals and could not follow simple rules. This is proven incorrect by the facts Katherine Milton gave in her article about her time spent in the Brazilian Amazon and the people who live there and still live with a Hunter Gatherer society today. Jean-Jacques Rousseau is a philosopher from France who made allegations about what the Hunter Gatherer society was like and how they behaved. Similar to him, there was Thomas Hobbes a philosopher from England who also made claims on what it would be like 15,000 years ago before Homo sapiens made the switch to an agricultural society. Genesis also made cases on what it would be like back then and how the people behaved.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because it is believed natural man is to be like this by Rousseau, inequality isn’t prominent in nature. In the other half, Rousseau criticizes the inequality of property -- how work and oppression divides people into property. He also describes the development of technology and how it influences people’s virtues. The property class and the struggle of poor vs. rich led to the idea of a contract to solve the inequality issue. “But according to Rousseau, it is a liability: “Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains.””…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, Thomas Hobbes describes the state of nature and human beings as solely wanting power over one another. He states that nature makes humans equal from the start as so nobody is smarter or stronger from the beginning, but by how we allow ourselves to become. According to Hobbes, the state of nature has “no common ways of life, no enforced laws or moral rules, and no justice or injustice, for these concepts do not apply” (Hobbes, 66). In this quote he means that there is society would be incapable of existing except with the power of the state. He has the idea that humans would be incapable of governing themselves because eventually everyone would break out into chaos and lose all order they had.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of the state of nature has been explored by many scholars (John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Rawls), which can help us better understand how gender fits into the different concepts of the state of nature. Mankind was brought into this world in a state of nature (pre-social condition) and had to give up liberties for self-preservation under a ruled society for the sole survival of man, or to better themselves. When describing the beginning of civilization, it’s vital to understand the different interpretations of how mankind created social contracts to avoid the state of nature. Two definitions of the state of nature that are important to understand is that of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s. But more importantly, within the state of nature lies each author’s definition of gender and how it shows the structural similarity and differences between the two.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Natural Liberty in Nature Alone Modern idealizations of success and prosperity over one’s lifetime are generally compromised by images of wealth, academic achievement, innovation, and leaving a legacy behind. Although all are perceived to be accomplishments, the state of nature at its core does nothing that requires man to submit himself to these needs. Instead, it is man who has over generations created the present constructs harnessing his passion, demanding his performance, and creating chasms in equality. According to Rousseau, man in the state of nature possesses true freedom unlike the civilized man.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state of nature is a philosophical device used to denote the hypothetical conditions of what the lives of people may have been like prior to societies coming into existence. This foundation of thinking poses many different scenarios and questions about the state of nature. Where some theorists remain optimistic about a state of nature, others argue it would be disastrous and impossible without a government. The way, in which one envisions the society will have drastic consequences for how the state and function is perceived. Two prime examples we can look at today are Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau strongly differ on their view of the purpose of the state. Hobbes sees the state as a positive institution that creates order and sows peace. Rousseau sees the state as an institution of chains, that renders it’s citizens salves to the will of the majority. Before reaching these conclusions they argue on the base nature of man. Hobbes argues that self preservation is the base of human nature whereas Rousseau argues it is property.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes, a lot of people want the same exact thing. Unfortunately, we can’t all have the same thing. So, according to Hobbes, appetite, scarcity, and power are key features of the state of nature. He views the state of nature as full of violence and fear, but also full of people only looking out for…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “He accomplished this by depicting the state of nature in horrible terms as a war of all against all, in which life is ‘solitary poor, nasty, brutish short’” (Leviathan, Chapter 13). Hobbes argues that, in order to get rid of the injustice, people had to give their full consent by giving up all their rights to the government so that the government can have full rights over the state of nature. It was set up to make people believe you are doing what is better to keep you in power. The beginning of state of nature meaning war.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays