His logic is actually good because he refers back to influential representatives that did not think the film was harming or bad. He addresses certain “issues” that were brought up by critics. He also makes the critics question their criticisms and he does this when he says “Do you question these facts? If so, I will submit them to a jury of three historians of established character, and if they decide against me I will agree to withdrawal The British of a Nation from the stage.” This gives him the advantage that he is able to understand other people’s views and opinions and that he gives them a fair chance at taking their criticisms into consideration. He defends himself from the critics by referring them to actually read articles and pieces of information that will prove his point. This make him very credible and logical. He finishes his response by saying that he’s not attacking the Negro of today and that he is only recording the
His logic is actually good because he refers back to influential representatives that did not think the film was harming or bad. He addresses certain “issues” that were brought up by critics. He also makes the critics question their criticisms and he does this when he says “Do you question these facts? If so, I will submit them to a jury of three historians of established character, and if they decide against me I will agree to withdrawal The British of a Nation from the stage.” This gives him the advantage that he is able to understand other people’s views and opinions and that he gives them a fair chance at taking their criticisms into consideration. He defends himself from the critics by referring them to actually read articles and pieces of information that will prove his point. This make him very credible and logical. He finishes his response by saying that he’s not attacking the Negro of today and that he is only recording the