Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

Improved Essays
Aquinas’ Cosmological argument, which is proving whether or not God exists through observations in the sensible realm, does not prove the existence of a God for many reasons. I will attempt to show at least two. Both stem from Aquinas not knowing more of the world, Or being unable to apply that knowledge. Aquinas believed that you could prove things through observing with the senses. In other words he followed the discipline of philosophy as perceived by Aristotle. His line of thinking regarding this argument was that any ‘x’ has to have been caused by a ‘y’, its pretty intuitive. An apple hitting the ground is caused by gravity, which, in turn was made possible by an appropriate amount of matter coming together into one place which was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nathan Cha Professor Song Philosophical Perspectives 17 December 2015 The cosmological Argument In William Lane Craig’s, “The Kalam Cosmological Argument,” he argues that whatever begins to exists had a cause of its existence, and since the universe began to exist Craig claims that the universe had a cause for existing. Craig furthers his claim by stating that God is the cause for the universe existing. To object to this argument J.L. Mackie brings some questions to the table to unpack Craig’s claims.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Aquinas is a Catholic saint that that is an immensely influential philosopher and theologian one of his argument is that God created an ordered natural world and God also created man's ability to use reason. For me yes it’s still logcal to believe in this account of Aquinas, as a person that came on a Catholic school in my high school days but on the society today many of the people didn’t use this God’s gift they will just think themselves on being in a higher ground because if you are higher than others you have the power, money and authority on what you want to do. They didn’t use it to have logical reason on the natural word basis that we should have a balance standing in our society.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The cosmological argument takes the presence of the universe to involve the presence of a being that made it. It is an argument that begins from the presence of the universe, and from endeavors to demonstrate the presence of God. This argument draws on involvement from the material world. It is crucial to know that the most this contention can plan to demonstrate is that there exists a vital being who caused everything in the universe. Nagel’s summary of this argument is as follows:…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kalam’s Cosmological argument dates back to medieval Muslim philosophers. Kalam’s argument is an argument for the existence of the universe to the existence of God. William Kane Craig is promoting modern day versions, which attempt to overcome the problems of earlier versions. The differences and similarities between Kalam’s Cosmological Argument, Aquinas's and Paley's design arguments can be examined to determine that it has failed to overcome the difficulties present in Paley’s and Aquinas arguments.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In essence, how could the universe (something) suddenly appear out of nothing? His argument claims that it is not possible, as God, an omnipotent being who, without the universe, remains timeless and unchanging, existed as the original cause of the universe. As an agnostic, I hesitate to say with any certainty whether there is an all-powerful creator who set the events of the universe in motion,…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the position of the existence of God, several arguments are debated. The cosmological argument, according to the text, holds the position that the universe exists and that something outside of the universe is required to explain its existence; that something being God (Pojman, 57). William Paley presented an inductive, teleological argument in which he believes that we complex beings didn’t occur naturally, thus, the universe must have an intelligent designer (class notes). An opposing position, argued by Hume (Cleanthes), presented several arguments to discredit Paley’s position on the existence of God. Though both men held unique points of views from their arguments, I believe that Hume did a better job at discrediting Paley’s teleological argument and showing exactly where it failed.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before St. Thomas Aquinas gave an answer to the question whether God exists in things, he, in I.7, answered that God is limitless. The characteristic of limitless things is to exist with an unending amount everywhere in everything . Then he asks about God’s existence in things, I.8.1-4. He is trying to answer the questions: Is God in all things, Is God everywhere, Is God everywhere by essence, power, and presence, and Does it belong to God alone to be everywhere? These questions and their answers are a significant component of Aquinas’s understanding of the natural world.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas hypothesised that nothing can be the cause of itself because “it would be prior to itself, which is impossible.” This is one out of three key elements of the cosmological argument that are justified to prove God: cause, motion and contingency. To further support the cosmological argument Aquinas argued that motion cannot be traced back to infinity because there must have been a first movement that began the series of movements. Aquinas argued that the first mover was God because He cannot be moved: He is an external energy.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There is sufficient reason to believe that God is the cause of the universe” The cosmological argument is a multitude of arguments that have been developed to modern day ideas. These arguments are based on natural theology; this is when someone has knowledge of God based on experiences. It is a philosophical argument that aims to prove the existence of God. The cosmological argument rejects the idea of infant regress because if that is the cause there is no need for God.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first argument McCloskey objects is the Cosmological Argument. The Cosmological Argument is considered the argument of existence. McCloskey argues that the existence of the entire world does not make it a legit reason to believe in a higher being. He suggests the only reason people take this stance behind the Cosmological Argument is because they are reliant organisms within the world.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I liked the layout and supporting details of this argument. Paley outlined five supporting arguments referenced as: motion, natural cause, the possibility of necessity, the minimum/maximum found in things, and the goal and purpose. The author assumed that god was the creator of all and the controller of everything around us. For example; if a tree has an acorn, how does one know how the acorn got there in the first place.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question being asked is does Samuel Clarkes cosmological argument succeed or fail? Through his reasoning, I believe that his argument succeeds. After some thorough consideration and advising I have found all of Clarks premises, which are the steps in his argument, valid and cannot be fully proven otherwise. Clarkes cosmological argument is as follows: (1) There exists either an unending chain solely of dependent beings or there also exists at least one independent being; (2)…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God has been an argument that society has been fighting for years, along with other debates within them. If you believe that God exists, then the argument would be whether or not Jesus Christ is his one true born son. The cosmological argument only deals with the fact that the universe is created by a great designer. Some say that this argument is illogical because one can simply not know whether or not that there is an intelligent creator, and the universe could create itself through nothingness. Then again, it is impossible to know whether or not that the universe did create itself from the void.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas’s sees his conclusion as being correct with a reflection back to his premises because God is the reason that the world is intelligent. How else can these things be possible and have purpose behind them if they aren’t being guided by someone who has structure. In quote, he states “There therefore is some intelligence which directs everything in nature towards an end, and this we call God” (PBF 44). Aquinas is basically saying overall that nothing just ends by chance, but by someone that is necessarily able to end it, which is his God. As Aquinas states within his fourth reason, he says “therefore there is something which is the cause of being, of goodness, and of whatever other perfection that there may be in things (PBF 44).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both sought to prove the existence of God in their writing. And, both of them used the ontological argument, which is an argument not based on the observations of the world, but through natural reasoning alone. But, they both had differences not only in the opinion, but on how to reach a side in an argument. Aquinas very much so believed in God, and using natural reasonings he thought he could prove the existence of God. Aquinas knew that you cannot prove that God exists for someone who does not believe through faith alone.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays