Thinking Skills Paper 2
1. a) (i) One factor that reduces the reliability of Jane’s report in the daily log is that she makes the assumption that the reason Charlie is uncooperative is because she does not let him eat chips. (ii) One factor that reduces the reliability of Alan’s report in the daily log is that when Alan was taking care of Charlie, he might have still been feeling the effects of the sedative that was given the day before.
b) Source C shows that Jane had warned Charlie about relocating him to another home so that he would lose touch with his friends at Ropewalk which may be considered bullying.
c) The Senior Care Worker’s memo in response to Alan Dale’s allegation does not really correspond. Alan accuses Jane of bullying the …show more content…
Those with more schooling may also have more money so they are able to afford more healthy activities.
d) I agree with the statement “If you want to live a longer, healthier life, obtain as much education as you can” to a small extent. With more school, you are able to educate yourself on the possible ways to avoid certain diseases such as heart conditions and diabetes listed in Source D. However, more education will not be able to save you from diseases such as heart disease caused by stress. The more education one receives the more stress that follows.
3. a) “However, lying is not always wrong, because some people do not have a right to know the truth.”
b) “There are many reasons why people should in principle not tell lies.” ”However, lying is not always wrong, because some people do not have a right to know the truth.” “Even ‘white lies’, told for good motives, can do more harm than good.”
c) In the argument I feel that the author goes off topic when he brings up the topic of privacy. The argument of lying for privacy purposes weakens the once strong argument. The author spent most of his paper talking about this lying for privacy issue that did not really work out in the end. If he was to drop this point and just support his other arguments with factual evidence his paper would have been more
1. a) (i) One factor that reduces the reliability of Jane’s report in the daily log is that she makes the assumption that the reason Charlie is uncooperative is because she does not let him eat chips. (ii) One factor that reduces the reliability of Alan’s report in the daily log is that when Alan was taking care of Charlie, he might have still been feeling the effects of the sedative that was given the day before.
b) Source C shows that Jane had warned Charlie about relocating him to another home so that he would lose touch with his friends at Ropewalk which may be considered bullying.
c) The Senior Care Worker’s memo in response to Alan Dale’s allegation does not really correspond. Alan accuses Jane of bullying the …show more content…
Those with more schooling may also have more money so they are able to afford more healthy activities.
d) I agree with the statement “If you want to live a longer, healthier life, obtain as much education as you can” to a small extent. With more school, you are able to educate yourself on the possible ways to avoid certain diseases such as heart conditions and diabetes listed in Source D. However, more education will not be able to save you from diseases such as heart disease caused by stress. The more education one receives the more stress that follows.
3. a) “However, lying is not always wrong, because some people do not have a right to know the truth.”
b) “There are many reasons why people should in principle not tell lies.” ”However, lying is not always wrong, because some people do not have a right to know the truth.” “Even ‘white lies’, told for good motives, can do more harm than good.”
c) In the argument I feel that the author goes off topic when he brings up the topic of privacy. The argument of lying for privacy purposes weakens the once strong argument. The author spent most of his paper talking about this lying for privacy issue that did not really work out in the end. If he was to drop this point and just support his other arguments with factual evidence his paper would have been more