Argumentative Essay: Swearing Public Officials Into Office

Great Essays
Topic: Swearing public officials into office
General Purpose: To argue
Specific Purpose: To argue that the federal government should make it illegal to swear public officials in on a religious document
I. Central Idea/Thesis Statement: The federal government should prohibit using a religious document in Oath of Office ceremonies because the Officials taking the oath are affirming to protect the laws of our country, not of their religion, their use of these documents does not pass the lemon test, and because America is not a religious nation.
Introduction
II. Attention Getter] On January 20th, 2013 the current President of the United States, Barack Obama, took his second oath of office.
A. With his right hand raised, and his left placed atop of two bibles, one owned by
…show more content…
“The government’s action must have a secular legislative purpose” (SCOTUS)
1. The backlash received by Congressman Keith Ellison in 2006 when he chose to take his oath on a Quran proves that the tradition of taking the oath on the Bible is a non-secular practice.
2. The most notable of this backlash coming from Dennis Prager, who commented “insofar as a member of Congress taking an oath to serve America and uphold its values is concerned, America is interested in only the Bible. If you are incapable of taking an oath on that book, don’t serve in Congress.
B. “The government’s action must not result in an “excessive government entanglement” with religion.” (SCOTUS) Using religious texts to swear loyalty to the state is an unnecessary entanglement.
Transition: Religious Rights groups have argued that the option an official has to choose the document they take affirmation on, including religious documents, is necessary to show respect for the beliefs of the citizens. The bulk of this argument comes from Christian Rights groups, who argue that America was founded on Christian principals; therefore the option to use the Bible in Oath of Office ceremonies is necessary to uphold the ideals of our

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    They claim that the founding fathers wanted America to be a Christian nation. They claim that Francis Bellamy wrote the phrase “under God” into the Pledge of Allegiance. They claim that America must not change; however, they are all wrong. From the establishment of America, George Washington and his co-founders wanted America to be a non-religious country. In the First Amendment, they wrote that “all religions are equal in the eyes of the law with no special preference or favoritism,” meaning no additional representation in our legislature (“A Delicate Balance”).…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effects Of Sharia Law

    • 1562 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Any place that applies Sharia to their legal system do not have a separation of Church and state. Islam believes in the relationship with people and Allah, which allows them to obey Allah’s principles as revealed by the prophet, Muhammad (Gould, 2008). Islam has a set of teachings that each person has to follow so they can be judged positively at the Day of Judgment. However, Christianity has an orthodoxy grounded in faith, a set of values that are sometimes used to complicate the teachings that regulate the activities of believers. The United States constitution states that “Congress shall not abridge the freedom of speech.” While this is America’s legal beliefs, Sharia Law is quite different from this.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Emily Feder Western Political Thought Paper Topic 5 The Establishment Clause: Fact or Fiction “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” These words are an integral part of the establishment of the framework of the United States, but does religion really have no place in politics? The debate over the role of religion in civil society dates back to 18th century. The greatest analysis can be found in John Locke’s Letter Concerning Toleration and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality. While the two scholars disagreed on the role of religion, they both agreed that the interaction between the state and the church must be managed. Both Locke and Rousseau had a tremendous…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defensively, Hale explains his reason for his suspicions, “Goody Proctor, I do not judge you. My duty is to add what I may to the godly wisdom of the court.”(p 67) In a theocracy such as this, must one prove themselves to be holy Christians in order to avoid getting in trouble with the court. In a Puritan society, religion is the law. Therefore, by not going to Church, John Proctor increases Hale’s suspicion of the Proctors being involved with witchcraft. When Hale talks about the “godly wisdom of the court” he implies that God’s words, the Bible, are the laws of the court.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, Liberalism is based upon respecting past, but refusing to be under its dominion. A liberal ponders, investigates, and rejects sacred beliefs and writings if they do not commend to his intelligence or moral values. Therefore, liberals claim that even the most Christians writing, including Scriptures must be refuted and dismantled if they do not agree with a human mind. Conversely, Machen states that Christianity is founded upon Scriptures, implying that the Scriptures are the most sacred presentation of God and their validity must not be questioned or changed by the human reason. Hence, Liberalism is totally different than Christianity as it is based on emotions and perceptions as…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment states that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” The amendment clearly protects the right to religious freedom, but also confirms that the Bible has no relevance to the American law. Religion is not supposed to be the deciding factor of our country’s laws. Likewise, the majority of people that are against same-sex marriage are religious and are trying to persuade people to believe what they believe because they think it is the right way. But like the first amendment says, people have the right to believe what they want to believe. One can agree with the argument against gay marriage because of ones religious beliefs.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is why we, the American people, need to ensure that there is no religious discrimination in our school systems. We need to stand up against teachings of religion in school because Thomas Jefferson said so, and the Supreme Court says so. The leaders in education need to understand that any preference of an establishment of religion is a violation of the Establishment Clause and cannot be permitted. The people of America need to fight for a separation of church and state so that our country can be the way our Founding Fathers planned it to…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation Of Religion

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The First Amendment says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It means the government can 't establish an official state church, the way many old-world European nations did. It means the government can 't outlaw religion, or prevent people from worshipping as they choose. Given how the IRS has now been turned into a political weapon, removing church 's ' tax-exempt status based on what the preacher says is a dangerous precedent. Whatever tax policy is applied to religious organizations needs to be implemented to all of them, across the board, equally.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Christian chaplain for Congress should be offend the First Amendment because people can choose to be any religion, someone may believe in a different form of a God. Another one that offends the non-establishment clause is the sessions of Congress opening with a prayer in Jesus name. Not everyone believes I Jesus. If not everyone believes in Jesus, then why is he being brought up. Jesus can be totally subjective to me or to anyone else.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    49). Tolstoy believes that in keeping with Christian teachings, there is no reason to resort to violence as a means to achieve an end. The use of violence on anyone, regardless of race is conflicting with the teachings of Jesus. Acts of any brutality go against the Christian teaching, and the disproportionate issues regarding race mirror forms of oppression similar to oppressive Biblical empires. There is hypocrisy in a nation where the vast majority of congressmen and politicians claim to be Christian, but the laws and regulations advocate for and accepted violence.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays