There's No Hate Speech Exception To The First Amendment By Joan Vennochi

Improved Essays
The article, "There's no hate speech exception to the First Amendment", was written in 2017 by Joan Vennochi, an American newspaper columnist for the Boston Globe. The newspaper article was published in the Boston Globe, a leading American daily newspaper. In this article, Vennochi defends the idea that the First Amendment protects even the speech we hate to hear. The author establishes her authority to speak on this subject by previously working as a City Hall bureau chief, and also as a State House bureau chief. The intended audience of this article is primarily the middle-aged generations who are specifically more involved in politics due to the fact that the Boston Globe caters to this group of people, Law professors, and Law students.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment of the Bill of Rights states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. " This entire amendment can be seen changed in the story, but the freedom of speech is something that has been taken away. People were not able to speak their mind since the majority of citizens have a hard time even keeping a thought due to implants in their ears.. The one time freedom of speech was shown in this story, the person who spoke up was shot and killed to maintain peace and…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First draft: Rosenblatt Summary and Response In “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid, and Dead” Roger Rosenblatt discusses the views of freedom of speech. He uses examples to show different people’s views on freedom of speech. He also adds his own opinion throughout the article. I may or may not agree on some of the views.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A First Amendment Junkie’s Argument Pornography is basic human right, according to Susan Jacoby in her article “A First Amendment Junkie”. How does she present a persuasive argument? Well, a good argument requires four things to be successful; it must have logos, ethos, pathos, and a lack of rhetorical fallacies. Susan Jacoby’s argument in “A First Amendment Junkie” is considered successful by most of these standards.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hatred is rampant today. It sometimes manifests itself physically in hate crimes or terrorism, but, more often, it’s only evident in the way that people communicate. Sometimes, it’s a barb thrown at someone else to insult them, sometimes it’s an argument in a conversation, and sometimes it’s an off-handed joke, but hate is all too prevalent in our world. So, how do we “oppose hate?” Michael Mascolo, argues that we shouldn’t ignore hateful comments, but we shouldn’t directly confront them either.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In her essay “A First Amendment Junkie”, Susan Jacoby argues that there needs to be an interpretation of the First Amendment, specifically when it comes to forms of expression such as pornography. Jacoby first states that she has received hate from feminists for her stance and comments on pornography. She asserts that this argument over pornography is no different than any other argument made about the First Amendment. Pornography is not anymore disgusting or disturbing than the other First Amendment arguments according to Jacoby. Not only are all of the arguments the same, but Jacoby states that they blur the lines between actions and thoughts.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having Free Speech is the basic right that Americans have, it is the ability to speaks one’s mind and ideas. Theres are many benefits to having the ability to project ideas without censorship. Caleb Yong author of “Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?” argues that the liberal justice has a special protection against the restriction of speech and expression, he calls it “Free Speech Principle” where it includes its “sensitivity to the distinction between coverage and protection (Yong)” that the speech should be monitored. Hate speech is too broad to single out the negative effect that it can have in any group. The main concept of this article includes the four categories that hate speech can be set in.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    under the first amendment which says "Congress shall make no law.... abridging (limiting) the freedom of speech, or of the press..." which allows the media free range on what and how they want to report in the media. meaning they can choose to support whichever side the want, as well as report the false or edited information because of the right to obtain and publish information or opinion without fear of punishment or government censoring that is the protection provided by the first amendment. but there is an exception to the first amendment's protection, while the press may have freedom to provide citizens with information and opinions about matter which are of public importance they often collide with other rights such a citizen's right to privacy or a defendant's right to a fair trial.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment was not created to harm someone else’s life as most of these newspaper articles try to do. I also believe that private institutions should be more responsible and sensitive to what they consider freedom of speech. I say this because if something goes wrong, the private institutions are most likely going to defend themselves by saying the First Amendment rights protects them as we’ve seen in the three previous examples that Fish brought up. A private institution should also be responsible for what they say because saying the wrong thing whether it’s offending or controversial, it can really ruin their reputation and can lead to hatred. The First Amendment is not going to stop people from hating or criticizing their institution.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A professed Muslim, Jew, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, Atheist or Agnostic might get a Democratic nomination and, or, a Republican party nomination but they will not get elected as President of the United States. The United States has had 44 Presidents and 43 of them were Protestant. The only President that wasn’t Protestant was John F. Kennedy. He was Roman Catholic and he was assassinated. Although, he hasn’t been the only President who has been assassinated, he has been the only President that wasn’t some from of Protestant believer.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all are entitled to freedom of speech but what is it when freedom of speech turns into a hate crime. Begging the question could be used as the logical fallacy with this article. Freedom of Speech is our constitutional right. Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community to articulate one's opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or sanction. People will continue to express themselves no matter how anyone else feels about the comments.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The freedom to speech is very important to many Americans. However, many wonder if some speech should be prohibited especially while online. This is because it is harming, slandering, or hateful. The best way to evaluate this issue is through Deontology. This is because every American has a right to free speech, according to the constitution, they also have duties and consequences that come with being able to say whatever they want.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Fields Free Speech

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today I’m here to express my views on the U.S. vs. Fields a very distinct and intriguing case that involves the topic of free speech. First we have the defendant Abel Fields who was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act, after Mr. Fields portrayed himself claiming that he had “military experience” claiming he had a Purple Heart, also the Medal of Honor, Navy Cross, and even the Air force cross. This made him believe that it gave him the right to speak with authority on the issues but these claims were false. Abel Fields appealed his decision to the court, stating that he viewed the Stolen Valor Act as unconstitutional and believes that his right to the first amendment was being violated. Field’s prosecutors argue that even though Mr. Fields…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguing the Feelings of Native American Mascots In “Appropriating Native American Imagery Honors no one but Prejudice,” Amy Stretten argue “Racial stereotyping, inaccurate racial portrayals and cultural appropriation do not honor a living breathing people. Plain and simple, cultural appropriation- especially when members of the culture protest the appropriation - is not respectful” (Stretten par.7). In short, Stretten is arguing that the way society goes about “honoring” Native Americans is offensive and should be discontinued.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article titled, “Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought,” Jonathan Rauch concludes that hate speech should not be censored on campus. Rauch believes that students have a right to academic freedom. He believes that students will not feel free to explore or question topics that may be taboo, if they are fearful of reprimand, limiting their ability to learn about the world during a crucial time in their education. First Rauch argues that gaining knowledge is painful and Knowledge cannot be separated from pain, even the most “scientific” criticism can be painful. For example, Physicist Ludwig Boltzmann committed suicide following criticism of his ideas.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garton Ash believes democracies should move beyond hate speech laws because they prevent “open and robust civility”, are paternalistic in nature, ineffective at preventing prejudice and discrimination, and lead to a slippery slope of what demands protection by law. Garton Ash presents the idea of “open and robust civility” as the balance of tolerance and ability to openly express oneself, which may be intolerant by nature. Hate speech laws prevent the ability for self expression if the views you wish to express are intolerant towards the protected groups. Hate speech laws allow groups to have the opportunity to use the “I’m offended” veto to shut down any speech they dislike. This restricts the openness that Garton Ash claims is just as necessary as the civility for living in a diverse society.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays