Armstrong's Theory Of Physicalism

Improved Essays
(a) Physicalism is defined as being able to describe everything in our world through physical processes. This means that all facts are the result of physical facts, including brain states. Also, because everything results from physical facts there are only physical facts. Everything is able to be broken down through any means whether through chemistry or biology or any other way to its smallest parts and still be explained by its physical parts.

(b) Armstrong’s argument for physicalism is that science is the best way to explain the mind problem. He believes that we have not yet been able to explain every conscious state through physical brain states, but some day we might. He would say that physicalism is true at a possible world w iff any world that is physically identical to w is identical to w unconditionally. This means that is we mapped out every physical fact possible in world one, the exact same mapping of physical facts would be the same in world two. He believes this because he thinks the world is made only of physical facts, and facts about a world are necessary to all other possible worlds.

(c) Armstrong’s analysis of mental states is that a mental state is identical to the causal processes of a brain state. He believes that you can define a term by its processes. He also believes that we can look at a brain
…show more content…
This means that all technology has a consciousness. If we build pieces of technology that have the ability to think as we do and go through similar experiences, then artificial intelligence is a very likely thing. The level of intelligence or consciousness that they would have would vary. We would have to change our behavior and mind set if we agree with Chalmers on the idea that technology can have artificial intelligence because some machines that we have built or will build in the future can function very similar to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For this argument, the mind is defined as a non-physical state where consciousness—awareness and thought—take place, and the brain is a physical construction of neurons, which interact to produce thinking and control the body. Mind-Body Dualism responds that there is a mind (nonphysical) separate from the body, meaning the brain (physical), with the mind in charge of mental states and consciousness, evident in love, belief in god, and personality, and the brain in charge of regulating the body, sense perception, physical motion, etc. They are two dual substances.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, it provides an argument in favour of physicalism since it seems to contradict the strong separation of mind and body suggested by dualism. But does it really disprove the fundamental difference between the mental and physical and is an insurmountable problem for dualism? First of all the claim, that mental states influence physical behaviour does not yet provide a conflicting counter argument to dualism.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He yearns to reduce this entire thing in materialistic terms, yet still preserving the humanistic qualities. He does this by stating mental states are identical with physical states. Although they have this relationship mental states are identical inner states and behavior is an outer state. Thus, this means that if one targets the correct area of the brain he can eliminate these mental states leaving being an animal of stimuli. All of these perspectives shed an illuminating light on the issues of physicalism and dualism which is to be debated for years to come.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He believes that we are not understanding what we are learning in school, but memorizing pieces to pass. By taking computer corrected tests…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such as biology and english, two things that we can all believe to be very different yet he believes that together they can be taught much more effectively? Then he brings up the whole idea on specimen on pg 58, a sample of something in his book the dogfish ,when he is talking about its individuality and specimen what is he trying to prove? When he states, that the human is not something we can study but struggle for, does he say this because we do not really know ourselves why would he refer to to humans as something we struggle for. Finally, the whole idea between expert and layman or planner and consumer what is his point behind them.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A physicalist believes that any mental state, such as emotions or disorders, can be understood and explained in entirety by simply examining the physical brain. Physicalists accept that everything in the universe falls within the realm of the physical, for this reason they “hold that complete physical knowledge is complete knowledge” (291). The main difference between physicalism and its easily-confused counterpart, materialism, is that physicalism holds a wider definition of what it means to be physical. According to Jackson, physicalism includes “everything in completed physics, chemistry and neurophysiology” rather than materialism’s belief that everything is tied to a material interaction (291). In other words, physicalism maintains that if knowledge of the physical world is understood completely, there is nothing else that we can learn.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Of Supervenience

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though the completeness of physics provides strong support for physicalism, in the case of the mind this does not necessarily mean that mental properties must be reduced to physical ones, only that the ‘mental’ must depend upon the physical base – the brain. Papineau’s claim that the “the mental is ontologically inseparable from the physical” (Papineau, 1993, p. 23) does not necessarily mean that the mental can be reduced to the physical. But if mind properties are still a particular kind of physical properties, how then are mental and physical properties related? Note that the question is in terms of relations, not in terms of realization or implementation; the later will be discussed shortly.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He added that the mental cannot exist outside the body, and the body cannot think (Sober, 2013). However, he did not deny that interactions took place between the two such that, for example, Advil can be used to treat headaches or desires can make the body move (Sober, 2013, p. 204). On the other hand, the Mind/Brain Identity Theory holds that the mind and the brain are one and the same object. Moreover, it claims that mental events can be correlated with physical events in the brain, such that, for example, headaches are a result of specific changes of chemical activity in the brain (Sober, 2013, p.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In page 3, line 6, he provides his first assumption of substrate independence. In this claim, he argues that if we can model the mind with sufficient detail, similarly we can create artificial ones that can think in the same way we do. He further argues that if we could simulate the whole world with enough detail and feed the entire world with artificial minds we had created in sensory form inputs, then the artificial brains cannot determine whether they are in a simulation unless their creators provide them with the explicit knowledge to do so. Hence this helps in clarifying his claim that indeed there is the possibility of existing in a simulation without realizing…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of whether the self can exist separately from the body is hotly debated. One argument that attempts to answer this question is called the conceivability argument. However, the conceivability argument is insufficient to prove the possibility of a non-physical self because our ability to conceive of something is flawed. The conceivability argument is in favor of dualism, suggesting the existence of a non-physical mind.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that we had to think of the world this way because that's the structure that our thoughts tend to have; we think of the world as substances that have properties. He also points out that we tend to think of the world in “if…. then” type of judgments and that from here our belief in causation happens; we organize the world in cause and effect…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism still struggles with this. However, Behaviorism dissolves this problem because again, in virtue of its physicalist foundation, it implicitly assumes a consistency among other humans that Substance dualism doubted. Because of this, minds are physically the same and only experientially different and so can be assumed to operate similarly to one another. Because of the physicalism of Behaviorism, it is able to dissolve two long existing problems of…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His argument is that the mind is different from the brain, which would be apart of the body; therefore the mind is also different from the body. He comes to this conclusion through the first and second certainties of the external world…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays