Opposing Mills’ view, Berger defines an ‘ideal type’ of sociologist as “[someone who uses] operations… [and is] bound by certain rules of evidence. As a scientist, the sociologist tries to be objective, to control his personal preferences and prejudices…” (Berger, 5) This means that the sociologist must differentiate between his world and the world he is observing and by doing so the sociologist is being objective and therefore credible with his work. Their views on what makes sociology credible were not the only things that these men disagreed on. Mills believed that sociology is a science that should benefit people’s lives, while Berger argues that it is a neutral science. The problems Mills deems sociological
Opposing Mills’ view, Berger defines an ‘ideal type’ of sociologist as “[someone who uses] operations… [and is] bound by certain rules of evidence. As a scientist, the sociologist tries to be objective, to control his personal preferences and prejudices…” (Berger, 5) This means that the sociologist must differentiate between his world and the world he is observing and by doing so the sociologist is being objective and therefore credible with his work. Their views on what makes sociology credible were not the only things that these men disagreed on. Mills believed that sociology is a science that should benefit people’s lives, while Berger argues that it is a neutral science. The problems Mills deems sociological