Formal education must be intentional in creating a learning environment that welcomes student inquiry and critical thinking (Fallace 2012; Freire, 1993; Rossatto, 2008). Students and teachers must be free to discuss current events, as well as historical events, that will ensure the growth of the student. In addition, diversity should be recognized and viewed as a way to understand history (Dewey, 1916; Fallace, 2012) versus being used as a way to limit potential or continue to oppress the oppressed. Communication, which gives life meaning (Freire, 1993), should be used to inspire curiosity and promotes solidarity with others (Rossatto, 2008). The banking concept of education, which is viewed as an oppressive structure (Freire, 1993; Rossatto, 2008), should not be employed. Students should not be viewed as having nothing to contribute. Instead, an environment that provides cooperative learning between the student and the teacher, where the teacher is also at times a learner (Freire, 1993), will ideally push all the participants, students and teachers, to reach higher goals than just continuing to
Formal education must be intentional in creating a learning environment that welcomes student inquiry and critical thinking (Fallace 2012; Freire, 1993; Rossatto, 2008). Students and teachers must be free to discuss current events, as well as historical events, that will ensure the growth of the student. In addition, diversity should be recognized and viewed as a way to understand history (Dewey, 1916; Fallace, 2012) versus being used as a way to limit potential or continue to oppress the oppressed. Communication, which gives life meaning (Freire, 1993), should be used to inspire curiosity and promotes solidarity with others (Rossatto, 2008). The banking concept of education, which is viewed as an oppressive structure (Freire, 1993; Rossatto, 2008), should not be employed. Students should not be viewed as having nothing to contribute. Instead, an environment that provides cooperative learning between the student and the teacher, where the teacher is also at times a learner (Freire, 1993), will ideally push all the participants, students and teachers, to reach higher goals than just continuing to