Theme Of Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
Reginald Rose the playwright of 12 angry men meritoriously explores the prevalent theme of prejudice. We learn from the judges offstage opening instructions the given circumstances which include a man has been accused of murder and his fate is to be determined by 12 jurors. The play echoes the backdrop of what social and political conflict America was involved in at the time. One of which was an ongoing engagement with the soviet union called the cold war. America was also facing an internal struggle, The Civil Rights Movement, which was concerned with how racial discrimination must diminish and how respect and equality must prosper. Remaining to predetermined biases many of the jurors are quick to form opinions and therefore arrive at many …show more content…
His opinion is expressed through many quotes throughout the book such as on page 59 "...That goddamn rotten kid. I know him. What they're like. What they do to you. How they kill you every day. My God, don't you see? How come I'm the only one who sees? Jeez, I can feel that knife goin' in." This shows the vengeance and discernment he has towards the boy. This quote reveals the true side of juror 3 and his genuine motivation towards the boy on trial and how juror 8 is uncluttered by personal biast.
8th juror as a spokesperson for justice and a great example of reverse prejudice concedes the fact that he “cannot send a boy off to die without talking about it first.” (page 7) Many of his quotes deeply shows his fortitude and aptitude to scrutinize the proof to guarantee the undisputable nature of his misconduct. Juror 8 presents an idea of concern and empathy towards the defendant. He is often very repetitive in his saying of how the boy has had a miserable life however as he defends the boy many of the jurors have conflicting views towards him, one of whom is juror

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry men, a 19 year old boy is on trial for the murder of his father. 12 jurors hold the fate of his life in their hands, by deciding whether or not he is guilty. They decide this by the use of reasonable doubt, looking at the evidence given for the case, and the witnesses testimonies. The boy is considered a “slum” or to have grown up in the slums ; a very populated area with run-down buildings and people that may have had, or have a financial burden, or don’t have the money to take care of their families and have a “nice” house at the same time. Due to prejudice from some jurors and sympathy from others, and the general diversity between the them, you can put yourself in their positions, and decide whether he is…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men is a compelling and profound film produced in 1957 directed by Sidney Lumet. This film set in a single room with just twelve cast member, these twelve play a jury called together to judge a murder case involving a young boy who is accused of murdering his father. The jury is charged with coming to a unanimous decision because the punishment is death penalty. Throughout the movie the cast is never referred to by name, rather by their jury numbers offering the viewer an air of mystery and intrigue. The film further shows its artistic talent by offering not only a story to challenge the mind but also the audience’s ethical beliefs.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of the arguments and issues with the case that he seems to care most about are the knife Juror #8 bought that is similar to the murder weapon and how fast it took the elderly man to get to the door. In Act 1, Juror #4 begins to explain that the knife used is very unusual. That even the store-keeper that sold the knife had never seen a weapon like that before. Juror #8 then argues that someone could have possibly gotten a knife similar to the one the boy had and then “reaches into his pocket and swiftly withdraws a knife... they are exactly alike”(23).…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to sending a young boy to the death penalty. There is a lack of evidence which supports why the young 18-year-old boy stabbed his father and in turn leaves some of the minds of the jurors in a place where they are unable to convict within moral certainty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors, probably the most important aspect of the criminal justice system, in itself. The American justice system, is built on the idea that justice is blind, therefore, justice is fair, however, it is the jury that ensures that fairness, with that said, it is understandable how one’s bias can compromise the criminal justice system. Therefore, jurors are faced with their own personal bias, moreover, they struggle with their decisions due to personal beliefs, some of which may not be ethical. It is clear, that the adversarial, or adversary system, allows for the most transparent and fair process that exist on this planet, just ask the People’s Republic of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a number of biases among the jurors. Juror 3 just hates slum dwellers and juror 7 wants to pass a guilty verdict quickly so that he can catch the baseball game. Juror ten also segregates society in terms of racial and social class.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By juror #8 not going along with the group, he demonstrates the limits of conformity one of which is the sense of self. Juror #8 showed high self-esteem and leadership that help him to combat the pressure of conformity. After reaching a 11 to 1 vote, the other jurors are quick to criticise juror # 8 but he stands his ground and ask the group to think about the matter a bit more.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The importance given to their personal values and life experiences, in fact, played a crucial role in determining how fair, and conflicting the outcome of ethical decision making was, as initially, they were not giving the boy a chance to a fair trial. The juror’s job was to compare facts, look at the evidence discussing among themselves. By considering only the most obvious aspects in order to make a certain decision is never an ideal outcome or fair for the accused. Some jurors, especially number three was judging about the boy by comparing their circumstances with their own circumstances. They were especially looking for every negative circumstance to conclude the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the start of the deliberation, the jurors each vote upon their verdict to see where the others stand. The first vote is by hands which creates a similar situation tested in the Asch conformity experiments. In the experiment, people are placed in a fake pool of test-takers and are asked to identify which line correctly matches the one provided. All of the other members of the pool have been asked to give the same incorrect answer to see what the subject does. Since there was a vote by hand in deliberation, most people would have seen the majority running toward guilty and picked guilty as well.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    12 Angry men The screenplay takes place in New York and was written by Reginald Rose. There is two versions of 12 Angry men, 1957 and 1997. The author’s intent of the screenplay is prejudice. It’s a prejudice screenplay because in the 1957 version there was only 12 white jurors and out of the 11 men they chose guilty and one juror chose not guilty.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays