The Pros And Cons Of Armed Rebellion

Improved Essays
Donald Trump once tweeted to all his followers, “If somebody challenges you, fight back. Be brutal, be tough, just go get them” (“Donald Trump Quotes”). Rebellion is in everyone, and goes back to biblical times with Adam and Eve. Rebellion against the government traces back to ancient China during the Zhou Dynasty in 256 BC. Some rebellions have been justified and some have not. Rebellion has brought wars and has birthed new countries; it is needed to keep the government in check. America in all its glory was born in the heart of a revolution. Rebellion against government is not wrong and is justifiable if it is done with the mindset of bettering the country, protecting personal rights, and garners the support of others that have the means …show more content…
The question is not one of morality, but practicality (“When is Armed Rebellion Appropriate”). The thought of the gap in weapon systems, intelligence, command, and control has to be a factor in the decision. “The wounds of war are not easily healed” (“When is Armed Rebellion Appropriate”). For the soldiers, they suffer from both physical and mental wounds. For the families of the soldiers, whether they come home or not, it can be an emotional struggle. Depending on the situation, and if the war is on home soil, there can be a huge financial toll on the country. Determining whether the cause is worth the fight, the death, and the cost that comes with a guaranteed war has to be top priority from the start. If there is any doubt that the cause is worthy of the lives that will be lost, then it cannot be justified. “Armed rebellion is rarely a good idea because it is very destructive to civil society” (“When is Armed Rebellion Appropriate”). Rebellion is rarely good, but there are times that a worthy cause arises and the people have to take action. The American Revolutionists had to make this decision: was Great Britain oppressing the people in the United States enough to start a full fledge war on home soil. The Founding Fathers believed it was, and out of this came the greatest country on …show more content…
There are numerous others, included Thomas Jefferson, who think rebellion is necessary either to dissolve a corrupt government or to prevent the corruption of a government. As a citizen of any country, there is a right, even an obligation to rebel. If the government is no longer looking out for the people’s best interests, then it is the job, not an option, but necessity of the people to take out the government and either correct it or install a totally new

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the 1790s an excise tax on spirits angered Pennsylvania farmers lead to the Whiskey Rebellion, over which many Americans differed in opinion. Many groups and people were in favor of the Rebellion feeling that the government’s actions were unfair and an overstep of their boundaries. This included the Republican Party who believed in the federal government having limited power. Other representatives believed that the tax and the rebellion that followed ultimately causes harm to the American people and called for repeal. The final ad most important group of supporters were the Pennsylvania residents that were directly impacted by the taxes, many of whom participated in the riots.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles were made in reaction to the excesses of the power of the English monarchy. They created a very weak central government and made the individual states as sovereign as possible while still in a loose association with one another. The Articles did not allow the national government to collect taxes, regulate trade, foreign or domestic, or create a national court system. Further, there was no easy method for assembling a national army. All of these faults led to very independent states, each with their own laws and courts, and even currency, which did little to promote cooperation, economically or otherwise.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history there has been an abundance of times when people decided what their rights should be and broke free from their loyalty to their ruler. For instance, when the colonies decided that they would no longer follow the British law. King George III violated the colonists basic human rights by unfairly taxing them and the patriots came to the conclusion that following under the England monarchy wasn’t ideal anymore. Life in the colonies differed in many ways compared to life in England. For over 100 years the colonists lived undisturbed by the English.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goverment has worked to reduce taxes and allow poor farmers to pay their debts. The rebellion suggested about the importance of a strong…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout civilization, man has revolted against authority. In ancient Rome, slaves rebelled against their owners. For example, Spartacus led a slave army that took eight Roman legions to quell. Rebellion happens when people want to change aspects of authority; they want to modify inequitable laws, to reduce heavy taxes, and to improve their lives. Rebellions can tranform a society view by believing that laws unjust, issuing challenges against authority, and reforming to create betterment for society.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Settlers in the American backcountry often protested to express the grievances with the Federal Government and the regulations and policies they set in place. Taxes of goods and crops were the root for the Whiskey and Shay Rebellions. The Shay Rebellion raised awareness for the need of s a stronger central government. Referring to the Shay Rebellion, historian Leonard L. Richards quotes, "fundamentally altering the course of U.S. history." Farmers in Massachusetts in 1786 were fed up with the government.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Advantages Of Civil War

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Civil War fought for the end of slavery between Union and South (North and South). It was one the most important war ever fought in history. Remarks of Civil war are still to be remembered. During Civil War, Abraham Lincoln was the president and he disliked the whole system of slavery. The Northerners and Southerners had their own strengths and weakness.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4.) The Civil war was a bloody war. It was one the most important wars in history. It consisted of a separation between the North and the South. It was a war over slavery and advancement.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malcom X, an American Muslim Minister and rights activist, once said that “You are not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you cannot face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it.” He is speaking of a term called civil disobedience, the active refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of the government, or of an occupying international power. Civil disobedience is used by influential “rebels” all over the world and throughout history. Many people have different opinions on whether civil disobedience is important or not.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society as it promotes the creation and the retention of a free country. Free societies are often considered more advanced than the oppressive ones because freedom is something that evolved out of oppression. Now, in the modern world, governments are more or less established, and for them to be changed, the people must act. Civil disobedience is woven through the fabric of the United States. The Revolutionary war granted the underdog colonies independence-- not just independence but freedom.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the anticipated advantages must exceed the anticipated expenses and wastage in a long-term manner with an exclusive focus to establish the human rights. The hypothesis additionally contends that every one of the criteria should be available before a war can be regarded justifiable and henceforth embraced. The hypothesis of justifiable or reasonable war, without a doubt, contends that wars might be fought when there is no other choice for an entity to protect its sovereignty, freedom, the rights of citizens, and the safety of the nation as a means of extreme necessity. It suggests that the wars should be fought when the circumstances created by an external authority undermine the most crucial interests of a nation and do not at all encourage the contrasting options to utilize power. For example, WWII compelled a number of nations to go to war in order to maintain their freedom and preserve the basic rights of the…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people are discontent with the United States government. Ironically, the very same peoples’ actions often contradict their extensive complaints. An innumerable number tend to sit around and whine that things could be better while playing the role of spectators. They act as though they are watching a stage performance; they clap when the show is going well, and boo when it is not to their satisfaction, instead of participating in the show to add improvements. Peaceful resistance is frequently overlooked, but can prompt favorable changes in a society.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When exactly is military force justified? Is it ever justified? The answer lies, of course, in the eyes of the beholder. But when one considers…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the course of history political leaders and other important figures have often shared with the public their idea of a perfect and ideal society, many of these leaders try to bring their visions to life through the support of their followers. Martin Luther King Jr. and Thomas Jefferson were both strong leaders, and through the help of their supporters and followers both men tried to change the history of the United States by creating what they considered an ideal society. However, King and Jefferson had different ideas of what an ideal society looked like, some of their views were similar, both men believed that every human being had the right to be free; the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Despite a few similarities,…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Think about it this way , war is not justifiable . Would you stand by and watch while your family and country are being attacked by a formidable force to bodily and deadly harm ? Or would you fight back ? How could you fight back ? War is not justifiable to remember .…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays