Theme Of Moral Responsibility In The Bargain

Improved Essays
In the short story The Bargain by Guthrie, Jr. moral responsibility is the topic of discussion on who is responsible for Slade's death. Morally responsible means to be deserving of blame for an act that was committed. Many believe that Slade is solely responsible for his own death, however, Mr. Baumer is morally responsible for the death of Slade because Mr. Baumer knew exactly what he was doing and he knew that Slade would drink out of the barrel if he thought it was liquor. Some may say that Mr. Baumer is not to blame; however, he has reasons to hate and want to commit murder against Slade. In the beginning of the story, Guthrie introduces the characters and how they act right away. Slade is extremely racist towards Baumer and he refuses …show more content…
Baumer did not intend to kill Slade when he sent him to retrieve a barrel of poison. I understand why some may think this, however, Mr. Baumer knew that slade would drink the poison and end up dieing. Mr. Baumer knew that Slade doesn’t know how to read and that he will drink the liquid from the barrel if he thinks that it is alcohol. We know this because at the end of the short story Mr. Baumer is talking to the protagonist telling him how important it is to know how to read. Mr. Baumer said “Then ye go home, Al. Is good to know to read”(Guthrie 11). Knowing that Baumer had an intense hatred toward Slade based on what he said here it is obvious that he knew what was going to happen when he sent Slade to go and get the barrel of poison. He knew Slade did not know how to read and he also knew that Slade would drink whatever was inside the barrel because he thought it was poison. Mr. Baumer had obviously intended to kill Slade knowing that Slade would drink the barrel of …show more content…
many believe that Slade is morally responsible for his own death. I understand why people believe this; however, they forget to consider that Mr. Baumer knew what he was doing and had intended to kill Slade. He knew Slade didn’t know how to read and he knew that Slade would drink from the barrel knowing that it was whisky. Mr. Baumer also had motive to kill Slade because Slade is racist towards him and he constantly steals from Mr. Baumer and refuses to pay any bill that is given to him. Knowing this about Mr. Baumer there is no question that he did this on purpose and he is morally responsible for the death of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the story Our America, we’re trying to answer the question, are Tyrone and Johnny responsible for Eric Morse’s death? There is no right answer to this question since based on one's personal opinion and definition of responsibility. The universal definition responsibility is ”the opportunity or ability to act independently and make decisions without authorization.” In my opinion regarding this scenario responsibility matters because it's the answer to whether Johnny and Tyrone are guilty or not. Johnny and Tyrone have many reasons to be held responsible for the murder of Eric Morse, but because of the terrible influences that come from their neighborhood and people not putting in enough time to teach them right from wrong; they tried to…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Corrupt Bargain

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The new methods of campaigning introduced by Adams and Jackson in the elections of 1824 and 1828 were the corrupt bargain and mud-sling. The corrupt bargain happened when Adams and Henry Clay made a deal to bring down Jackson because he had the most popularity votes out Adams and Clay. Then later Jackson's followers accused them of the corrupt bargain and stealing the election. Then the corrupt bargain and unpopular policies casted a shadow over Adams presidency. Then during the champagning they would use a mudsling method that were basically attempts to ruin their opponent’s reputation with insults.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Romeo and Juliet kill themselves, but who was responsible for the tragedy of their deaths? It was the Capulet’s responsibility for the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. The Capulet’s were to blame because they were unsupportive, selfish, and unsympathetic. Capulet tells her that she is a “young baggage!…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Compromise

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We the People When making plans on how the distribution of power should be distributed, there will always be arguments. Whether to do it based upon the population, or of an equal distribution to all of the states involved, it is important to remember to make it fair to all the different citizens, taking into consideration all states and their populations. The amount of people a state has should not be the only determining factor for the amount of representatives in the houses of a legislature. There were many advantages and disadvantages of the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan brought up in the Constitutional Convention. We believe that the Great Compromise was a valid agreement, considering it did not give unequal power to any of the…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He comes from being a criminal, to a matured adult. At the beginning of the book, Bryon was self-centered. He only cared about himself and Mark, he didn’t care about anyone else around him, or what he did to them. Bryon always got into fights without a care in the world, and he always hurt innocent girls, by telling them he loves them without meaning. He was a player, but love struck him.…

    • 3531 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “An Inspector Calls” is a play written by JB Priestly, that revolves around a theme of blame and responsibility. To convey and show the moral of the play, it is contrasted to compare differences and to emphasize by setting responsibility as a central theme of the play but then providing a fascinating portrait of the way that people can let themselves off the hook and take no responsibility whatsoever. Priestly explicitly differentiates and portrays between those who have accepted their responsibility, those who blamed others and those who had no remorse whatsoever and went on with their lives as if nothing happened. However, in spite of its obvious structure and stereotyped characters, Priestly never failed to set an aura of dimension and suspense…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With his moral uprightness, it was expected that he would still feel guilty for Caesar’s death even if he had good intentions for killing him. He is the only conspirator to stab Caesar not out of envy, anger, or for personal gain, and he still felt at fault. A tragic hero must have some positive qualities in order to be called a hero, and Brutus’s nobility definitely fits the…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anslinger began a dishonest campaign against cannabis that would last over the next eighty years. Conservatives accepted his false claims and continued to spread propaganda that highlighted the dangers of marijuana use and its users. However, although some conservatives may have been motivated by greed and racism, others believed that they were doing the right thing according to their system of moral beliefs. In Moral Politics, George Lakoff explores “two different models of ideal family life [that] motivates corresponding sets of metaphorical priorities, each of which constitutes a distinct moral system” (65).…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    but it was really Boo. Heck Tate protects Boo Radley and they agree that Ewell did fall on his knife a decision that Scout could fully understand. Boo was a sweet, gentle, and innocent man who was misunderstood by the…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Four Agreements Reflection In the book The Four Agreements, Don Miguel Ruiz enlightens us about life. He gives us lessons that can help us in life. We can change our views on life by changing the way we think and act. Don Miguel Ruiz tells us that we are all limiting ourselves and need to open our minds to live an honest life. He tells us the way to do this is by following four agreements that can change your life forever.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monologue About Suicide

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John, How do you feel today? I feel a little bit better today. I feel everything going to be fine.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction In order to establish criminal liability, the actus reus must generally be proved. The actus reus of an offence are comprised with the prohibited conduct, the relevant circumstances, the consequence and causation. Causation is one of the four elements of actus reus. Causation in the criminal context is concerned with the legal attribution of criminal responsibility for consequences.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everything you do in life, you do it by choice. Regardless of the task, you have a choice to say yes or no. If you choose to do something, you cannot blame someone else for your actions. People tend to blame others for their faults, but at the end of the day, who said yes or no. In Thirteen Reasons Why Hannah chooses to end own on life; however, she blames others for her choice.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays