• Home Page
  • Theme Of Corruption In 12 Angry Men

Theme Of Corruption In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
Show More
Corruption in the court system is a real problem. People are prosecuted with little to no help from public lawyers, testimonies are made up and believed, and jurors are lazy and just want to get home. These are all things Reginald Rose is trying to show up in her script 12 Angry Men. She is informing us of the corruption in the court system and all it takes is one person to stand up and it all can change. There is little to no justice because people only think of themselves. People mainly think of themselves and the court appointed defence counsel is proof of that. In 12 Angry Men the defence counsel didn’t really help the kid at all they left many questions unasked because they just wanted the case to end. As NO. 8 states, “... …show more content…
This is proved by NO. 7 when he states in act 1, “Right this better be fast. I’ve got tickets to The Seven Year Itch tonight. I must be the only guy in the whole world who hasn’t seen it yet.” The jurors didn’t want to be there so they voted guilty so they could leave if it wasn’t for NO. 8 then the trial would of been over and none of the evidence would of been overlooked and the boy would of went to prison even though he is probably innocent. He made them look more closely and make sure they had the truth. The jurors didn’t care about the boy until NO. 8 made them. Reginald Rose saw the corruption in the court system and wanted us to be informed about it so she wrote 12 Angry Men. This script shows us the corruption in the court with the false testimonies, last jurors, and bad public defence counsel. She wanted us to see how bad it was and wanted us to help put an end to it. As she shows all it takes is one person to change all that. NO. 8 decided to look deep in the facts to find the truth. No matter how corrupt things are all it takes is for someone to stand up and look for the bad and try their best and it will

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8
    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pathos In Juror 8

    As the play progresses, readers learn of Juror 11’s origin because he consistently comments on the principles of America and why he came to the Land of the Free. Futhermore, Juror 11’s interaction with Juror 5 on page 246 insinuates Juror 11 has faced mistreatment prior to his arrival to America. Audience members sympathize with Juror 11 due to his submissive personality, which is revealed through Rose’s syntactical expertise. With lines shorter than the other jurors, Juror 11 speaks when it is necessary: “I think it was eight o’clock. Not seven” (227), “Perhaps this is not the point” (231), “I would think about ten seconds, perhaps” (235), and “Perhaps if we could see it...…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The 3rd Juror Prejudice Analysis
    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 3rd Juror Prejudice Analysis

    Rose exhibits the notion that prejudices and biases are factors in every conflict and can obscure the truth. The microcosm of characters ensures that each character has had different personal experiences, Personal experiences often influence the way reality is perceived by an individual, Prejudices and biases often take effect in conflict and can change the facts. The 3rd Juror has a bias against the boy as a result of personal experiences with his own son. Throughout the play, the 3rd Juror wants “to see [the] boy die because [he] personally wants it”, the 3rd Juror votes guilty throughout the play, the denouement of the play is met by the 3rd Juror realising that “it’s not [his] boy, he’s somebody [else’s].” The 10th Juror has a prejudice…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparison Of Twelve Angry Men And Democracy
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparison Of Twelve Angry Men And Democracy

    “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose and “Democracy” by Langston Hughes are different in that one text is a play with a jury that is an a conflict, whereas the other is a poem talking about freedom and equal rights. Although Rose and Hughes both say that everybody should have to do the something as everybody else, a key difference is that Rose and Hughes do not react the same way towards democracy. In “Twelve Angry Men” the author does nothing about the problem while in “Democracy” the author demands for freedom for everybody. In “Twelve Angry Men” Rose thinks that everybody/the jury should take democracy seriously, but not everybody/the juror’s does.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Old Age Analysis
    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men Old Age Analysis

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Just Mercy
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Just Mercy

    The author of Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson, is clever because his introduction did its job well in informing readers that the judicial system in America needs to be reformed. He did this by using variety of different persuasive writing tools. Stevenson used three of the many persuasive tools; these tools were pathos, ethos, and logos. These were his secret to convincing the readers to be on his side of the argument. The use of pathos was presented through a story of a prisoner who was on death row, Henry; it was used to draw the readers in emotionally.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Theme Of Just Mercy
    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theme Of Just Mercy

    Just Mercy is not set in one location, it varies throughout the book. The majority of the book is set in the Deep South in the 80’s and 90’s. Bryan Stevenson begins his journey with the justice system in Atlanta, Georgia. Throughout the rest of the book, Georgia, Alabama, and Louisiana are referenced. Though northern and “more liberal” states are not completely innocent of wrongful punishments, states such as California and Pennsylvania are included in Mr. Stevenson’s book, each with it’s own case.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection
    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    So they did a vote, but this vote was different it was a private vote. So the twelve men all casted in their votes. The foramen received the votes and open each on eagerly to see what the vote was. There was one more not-guilty vote. juror three after find this out gives juror five criticism, because he thinks that juror five’s vote was the not-guilty, and that he voted not guilty just because juror five grew up in the slums and felt bad for the boy.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas In Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men
    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical Dilemmas In Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men

    12 Angry Men is a compelling and profound film produced in 1957 directed by Sidney Lumet. This film set in a single room with just twelve cast member, these twelve play a jury called together to judge a murder case involving a young boy who is accused of murdering his father. The jury is charged with coming to a unanimous decision because the punishment is death penalty. Throughout the movie the cast is never referred to by name, rather by their jury numbers offering the viewer an air of mystery and intrigue. The film further shows its artistic talent by offering not only a story to challenge the mind but also the audience’s ethical beliefs.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: 12 Angry Men
    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis: 12 Angry Men

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Moral Ambivalence And Practices Of Police Corruption
    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Moral Ambivalence And Practices Of Police Corruption

    The accountability system may help control corruption as stated in chapter 7 but on the television show it did not show that it showed more of the corruption side of the police being able to be very forceful and basically do is they felt because they held the badge and the gun. I feel the book coincided with the episode of the show I watched. Another area in chapter 8 The police and the rule…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Group Problem Solving Process In 12 Angry Men
    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Group Problem Solving Process In 12 Angry Men

    During the first scene, the Judge defines and stablishes the problem, which is clearly specified; determine whether the boy is guilty…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Juror # 8 In 12 Angry Men
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Juror # 8 In 12 Angry Men

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Examples Of Group Dynamics In 12 Angry Men
    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Examples Of Group Dynamics In 12 Angry Men

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men
    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    Also, the members of the jury questioned the testimony of the old man. They questioned how the old man ran to the door and down the hall in such a short amount of time, yet he drug his leg when he walked and had a stroke the previous year. The jury questioned why the boy could not remember what movie he was supposedly at. They thought his knife was very unusual until one of the jurors bought the same exact knife for cheap right beside the boys house. The jury questioned how the women across the street could see into the window without wearing her glasses and they questioned how she turned over in bed at just the right time that she saw the murder happen.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    During their whole dispute, they come up with different ways to settle arguments, including going around the table and giving each person a chance to explain why they voted guilty or innocent and using evidence to prove one's point. Juror 8 always had evidence to back up his reasons, which convinced the others that maybe the boy is innocent. The ultimate resolution comes after everyone gives their input and puts all of the pieces together. They gain a different perspective which changes their thoughts on everything. After a long day, they…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings