Securities And Exchange Commission V. Howey Essay

Great Essays
Securities are investment products, which represents small fractional rights over a business enterprise or a pool of assets. Business enterprises and corporate entities use securities as a tool to raise capital. Primarily, securities provide their holders with either participatory rights in the earnings and management of the business enterprise or promised fixed returns over the value of investment made through purchase of securities. Securities with participatory rights are called equity securities and securities with promised returns are called debt securities. A combination of both is known as hybrid securities.
Conceptual Understanding
To fully understand the meaning and concept of securities, the landmark judgements of Securities and Exchange Commission v. Howey (Howey case) and Reves v. Ernst & Young (Reves case) comes to our aid. In the Howey case, the U.S Supreme Court laid down the essential requirements of an investment contract, which are relevant for determining whether a particular instrument is in the nature of equity securities. The Howey case held that the test of an investment contract is most basically whether the scheme involves an investment of money, in a common enterprise with profits, to come solely from the efforts of others.
The U.S. Supreme Court expanded the purview of the Howey test in United Housing
…show more content…
Therefore, for being recognised as securities under the SCRA, any instrument has to fall within the definition of securities. In order to be covered under this definition, the instruments have to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    DRED SCOTT V. SANFORD: THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS Jay Barber 25938654 HIUS-221 November 16, 2017 As seminal decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sanford brought the issues of racism and slavery to the forefront of American political culture during the nineteenth century. It has also been considered by legal and political scholars to be a “ghastly error”, the “product of an overly ideological and reactionary judge”, and a cause of the Civil War. Many abolitionists and Northerners declared the Supreme Court’s decision to be illegitimate while others demanded obedience to the Court’s decision and labeled disobedience as rebellion, treason, and unconstitutional.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coolidge V. S. 403 Essay

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was actually a very interesting case. Long story short, a man named Edward Coolidge was suspected and eventually charged with killing a 14 year female named Pamela Mason. Edward was questioned and cooperatively agreed to take a lie detector test and even showed the officers three different guns that he owned. The lie detector was inconclusive, but he did however admit of committing theft. Two different officers decided to visit the home while Coolidge wasn’t there to confirm his story with the wife.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first case is about Plessy v Ferguson which is a case that determined whether or not racial segregation is constitutional under the separate but equal doctrine. The second case is about Brown v Board of Education which decided that state laws requiring separate but equal schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Both cases had a powerful effect on the precedents that we now have in today's justice system. Plessy v Ferguson established the doctrine of “Separate but Equal” and Brown v Board of Education concluded that separate public schools for blacks and whites was deemed unconstitutional. Without Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, black and white students would likely still be separated to this day under constitutional laws.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ingraham v. Wright was a case where the Supreme Court had ruled (5-4 vote), on April 19, 1977, that corporal punishment in public schools did not violate constitutional rights. The case was brought up into court when an eighth grade student of a public junior high school in Florida, James Ingraham, who was paddled in 1970 by the principal Willie J. Wright and was also restrained by the assistant principal and the principal’s assistant (Lemmie Deliford, Solomon Barnes). James was hit by the paddle more than 20 times and required medical attention, later on a complaint was filed in 1971, other than Ingraham and a student named Roosevelt Andrews, another student has also been paddled. The complaint claims that the use of corporal punishment goes against the 8th Amendment, stating that it is a violation on the ban of ‘cruel and unusual punishments’, and the 14th Amendment which requires prior notice and an opportunity to be heard.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. The Dred Scott decision was a famous ruling in history of the courts. Scott had claimed that he was a resident on free land so that had made him free. Others thought different from Scott, so he sued for his freedom and he won. The decision was in effect when it had been declared unconstitutional by the Republican platform of restricting slavery’s expansion.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other exceptions include open fields, canine sniff, booking search and inventory, public safety, and officer safety. The purpose for this rule can be looked at like a way for law enforcements to conduct searches and seizures that do not violate the Fourth Amendment and individuals that have had their rights violated. This legal rule first made its appearance during the U.S. Supreme court case Weeks v. United States (1914). Freemont Weeks was arrested under suspicion of using the U.S. mail to transmit lottery tickets.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roper V. Simmons Essay

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case Roper v. Simmons, Christopher devised a plan to kill lady named Mrs. Crook after a previous encounter. He planned this murder with two other boys with only one showing up to assist with the murder. The other boy was younger than Simmons and was prosecuted within the juvenile system. Simmons was sent through the adult court system because he had already reached the age of 17 and was subject to adult court. The plan that was carried out was a home invasion where they bound Mrs. Crook with duct tape and electric cords and threw her over a bridge to drown.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the year 2000, a case came to the floor of the Supreme Court dealing with interpretation of the First Amendment. In a country of the free, we are plagued by discrimination daily. The targets have shifted over the years. Religion and race seem to be the ever-present discriminatory subjects. Though religious groups also cause hate of those who are different in sexual orientation.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The supreme court justices Samuel Alito answered to this case that Mr. Salina didn't have the right to remain silent. Mr. Salina was free to leave, which didn't insert his Miranda rights and he had therefore no right to remain silent. Justices Samuel Alito stated that Mr. Salina´s should have affirmatively invoked his rights, because without Mr. Salina´s having a lawyer or being told the Miranda rights he should have been more affirmative about his invoking. (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/salinas_v_texas_right_to_remain_silent_supreme_court_right_to_remain_silent.html) Salinas v. Texas is demonstrating the Miranda rules in a way where if the rules doesn´t apply the questioned from the beginning the Miranda rights doesn't apply either.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Paper

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thesis This paper will discuss the cases of: Weeks v United States, Mapp v Ohio, Gideon v Wainwright and Scott v Harris. This paper will discuss which of these cases was the most important and it has impacted the criminal justice system. Each of these four Cases answered questions that influenced the criminal justice system to a whole new level.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The case of Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan, 2005 SCC 13, [2005] 1S.C.R. 188 is considered very controversial as it questions the national public health concern that is caused by the smoke of tobacco and can affect our youth in a negative way. What this cases focuses on is s. 6 of the Saskatchewan Tobacco Control act and how by the virtue of the paramountcy doctrine is inoperative due to the fact of s. 30 of the federal tobacco Act. The doctrine of paramountcy establishes that where there is a conflict between valid provincial and the federal law or its purpose, the federal law will prevail. Furthermore, s. 30 of the federal tobacco act allows retail stores to display tobacco and tobacco product-related brand elements and post…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court Case of Reed v. Reed, 1971, The Extent of Equal Rights, two parents sought the ownership of their deceased sons estate. Richard Lynn Reed was still a minot when he passed without a will addressing which of his possessions would go to whom, both of his parents, Cecil and Sally Reed, made advances to claim their adoptive sons land. Both Cecil and Sally filed applications to become the administrator of the estate to the Idaho court, who then held a joint hearing for them. The court came to the conclusion that the Richards father, Cecil, would be granted administrator because the Idaho law dictated that “if several persons who are equally entitled to administer an estate file a petition, ‘males must be preferred to females. ’”(Supreme…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Investing Made Easy-The chapter describes the principles and outlines primers of the mutual fund and stock market. The chapter also explains significant terms and short synopsis used in the field of investing. It also explains the importance of investing. The chapter breaks down the information of investing in stocks. If young people can invest the little amounts, they earn and give it time they can get a high return for their funds.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays