Who were the "young guard?" Views? Generally-speaking, the “young guard” is a coined term that namely refers to the coterie of newer leaders, who tenaciously desired to revolutionize the Union altogether. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “They [young guard] were more interested in purging and purifying it [Union]. A strong anti-slaveryite, he [William H. Seward] came out unequivocally against concession. He seemed not to realize that compromise had brought the Union together…..” (Cohen & Kennedy 387). The quote above sheds light upon how Seward, a member of the so-called “young guard”, embraced the notion of a doctrine supreme to the Constitution. This is, of course, not to mention the
…show more content…
Venturing deeper into the specifics, Fillmore signed the Compromise of 1850, which, in turn, embraced the notion of concession. This is, of course, not to mention the fact that the southern extremists convened in Nashville, in order to further exemplify the South’s disdain towards such compromise measures. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “The delegates not only took a strong position in favor of slavery but condemned the compromise measures then being hammered out in Congress. Most alarming of all, the drastic new Fugitive Slave Law of 1850-‘the Bloodhound Bill’-stirred up a storm of opposition in the North” (Cohen & Kennedy 389). The quote above sheds light upon the critical events, namely those entailing the enactment of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 and assemblage of southern extremists, that spanned the course of 1850: a year laden with a large array of debates. To add to this, it is integral to note that southern boycotts, along with blatantly expressive newspaper excerpts, additionally spanned the course of the year. In brief, numerous events occurred in
Venturing deeper into the specifics, Fillmore signed the Compromise of 1850, which, in turn, embraced the notion of concession. This is, of course, not to mention the fact that the southern extremists convened in Nashville, in order to further exemplify the South’s disdain towards such compromise measures. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “The delegates not only took a strong position in favor of slavery but condemned the compromise measures then being hammered out in Congress. Most alarming of all, the drastic new Fugitive Slave Law of 1850-‘the Bloodhound Bill’-stirred up a storm of opposition in the North” (Cohen & Kennedy 389). The quote above sheds light upon the critical events, namely those entailing the enactment of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 and assemblage of southern extremists, that spanned the course of 1850: a year laden with a large array of debates. To add to this, it is integral to note that southern boycotts, along with blatantly expressive newspaper excerpts, additionally spanned the course of the year. In brief, numerous events occurred in