Her eventual breakdown is seen as the story concludes with her crawling over the body of her passed out husband. This storyline is, of course, carried through completely in the film version. John is still controlling, she is still sneaking to write in her journal, and the wallpaper is still an incredibly overwhelming thing. The mood intended by Gilman is present in both settings. However, there are many differences as well. One of the most important, yet seemingly small differences, is the name given to the narrator in the movie, Charlotte. She never names herself throughout the written story. The choice not to name a main character of a story was very well thought out by Gilman. A no-named character gives the readers the ability to relate because they could just as easily be this person as to anyone else. The writers of the film not only chose to name the narrator, but they chose the name of the author of the original story. This immediately takes away the idea that this is an everyman story and makes it appear to the viewer as the story of Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Another difference includes names again, but this time names of other characters. The baby,
Her eventual breakdown is seen as the story concludes with her crawling over the body of her passed out husband. This storyline is, of course, carried through completely in the film version. John is still controlling, she is still sneaking to write in her journal, and the wallpaper is still an incredibly overwhelming thing. The mood intended by Gilman is present in both settings. However, there are many differences as well. One of the most important, yet seemingly small differences, is the name given to the narrator in the movie, Charlotte. She never names herself throughout the written story. The choice not to name a main character of a story was very well thought out by Gilman. A no-named character gives the readers the ability to relate because they could just as easily be this person as to anyone else. The writers of the film not only chose to name the narrator, but they chose the name of the author of the original story. This immediately takes away the idea that this is an everyman story and makes it appear to the viewer as the story of Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Another difference includes names again, but this time names of other characters. The baby,