Pros And Cons Of Moratorium

Superior Essays
Discoveries in the field of genetics have given the world hope for a brighter future. With promises of disease eradication, increased intelligence, and longer lifespans, it is no wonder that people believe that this altering our genetic code is the solution to all of our problems. However, with all of these potential benefits, there come potential dangers. A new scientific breakthrough has come our way. Referred to as CRISPR, this new technology is the easiest, cheapest, and most reliable way of modifying the human genome to date (Caplan et al., pars. 1-3). This breakthrough provides humans with the power to master the genetic code, but are we capable of making the right decisions while in possession of such power? In April 2015, a group of 18 prominent scientists made a controversial plea for a moratorium on genetic research. To add to the controversy, this group included a biochemist that had been on the front end of the CRISPR discovery herself (Baltimore et al.). The amount of power that this technology provides has the potential for catastrophic consequences.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, CRISPR could harm the human race, and other races alike, severely. A team from Sun Yat-sen…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First Class: We talked in our first Class about President Trump’s plan to “Drain the Swamp.” The problem in Trump’s eyes is that career politicians are poisoning the system and the revolving door of politicians going to work for cooperations and lobbyists is bringing corruption. Trump continues to say that “things are bad in DC” however, their might be something bad with his terminology. “Drain the Swamp” is an open ended term—one that any American could project their goals onto, similar to the slogan “make America great again.”…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Listening for the Public Voice, by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienschein, discusses the issue of genetic engineering and the ethical dilemma and how the United States, government, and people are interacting in the struggle of the ethics behind genetic engineering. The authors present the facts that genetic engineering has laid in the grey area forever, and still continues to sit in that grey area. Genetic Engineering will occasionally find itself in the news and the argument reignites but falls flat within a couple of weeks waiting till the next breakthrough arises. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein stats some of the most recent progress in genetic engineering, which brings into perspective the relevance, development, and the possibility that soon…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore. ”-André Gide. This, to me, defines the parameters in regards to a class and academic project being rewarding; it has to reach further than the surface. For something to be rewarding it has to be valuable and worthwhile. Learning something new, uncovering information untold, and discovering something because of a simple curiosity is what I truly find rewarding.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Honors Ethics of Genome Editing Faculty: Jennifer L. Cruise (Biology) and Michael J. Degnan (Philosophy) Where do you draw the line between the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ of genome editing? Which traits are we allowed to change, and who decides this? Will we be allowed to use gene editing to change basic human traits such as intelligence and athletic ability?…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All of the sources that I have found are all showing positive results in experiments that are using CRISPR, which in fact leads me to believe that only in time we will be able to achieve the impossible. So far from my initial research findings I have a different opinion based on my questions I have asked before; one of the being is it possible to edit genes? The answer is most definitely YES. I have described tiny bits of how CRISPR works which was one of my initial research questions; I will go into detail within my full research paper. From my research findings and the experiments that were done resulting in a positive outcome which leads me to believe that in the future we will engineer our own kids and get everything we…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crispr Code Of Ethics

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For scientists who are waiting for an alternative to existing genome editing tools, Crispr-cas9 is the solution which is comparatively easy and effective in using. Crisper allows the researcher to edit, target, excise and stitch genes of their choice between two end cuts. Crispr has the potential to make such advances which researchers used to dream about. It worked so well, scientists began to issue ethical statements for its use particularly about the power of Crispr to change germline in humans which presents a hotly debatable issue. Genome editing in human germline could have unpredictable effects on future generations.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While this technology certainly helped spark the ethical debates concerning genome editing, it failed to yield an affordable and efficient means of editing human DNA. While there were many other gene editing inventions that dabbled in the field for the next couple of decades, it was not until 2012 that the reality of its feasibility truly became apparent. It was the “clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats,” and a nuclease that it utilizes, Cas9, (or CRISPR-Cas9 for short) that brought the conversation about gene editing back with vigor. Whether or not humanity has been able to agree on the use of gene editing, it has already proven successful in treating humans in a few extreme cases. Not only was the ability to edit human genes brought back to the forefront of conversation, but the disputes that lie among it were resurrected as well.…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone’s specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? (Hayes 245).” In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” Richard Hayes argues against Ronald M. Green, a professor of Emeritus of Religion and of Ethics and Human Values at Dartmouth College, specifically responding to his essay about using genetic technology to change children’s DNA. Hayes, who holds a Ph.D. in Energy and Resource, which saluted the United States to ban human cloning worldwide, believes it would disrupt human nature and the human future.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A goal all parents have in common is for their child to prosper throughout their whole entire life. There is no better way to guarantee that than to alter their genes to make them more attractive and/or athletic. This is a highly controversial method because the parents are changing their child before they are born. Thus, not allowing the child to be who he/she is meant to be. Leslie Pray describes reprogenetics as “extracting a single cell from an eight-cell embryo and analyzing the DNA of that single cell for the presence of one or more disease-associated genetic alterations” (Embryo Screening and the Ethics of Human Genetic Engineering).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, I hope to participate in research that reduces the occurrence of fatal genetic conditions using gene therapy along with research that limits occurrences of physical anomalies that serve as hindrances to others for entire lifetimes. In pursuing my goals, I have become aware of the challenges that I will experience along the way. As with every extensive scientific experience, constant negative backlashes are brought by those who disagree with the parameters of the studies. Groups who see it as crossing uncertain natural boundaries and tampering in matters best left to chance or hopes that matters will…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human evolution took millions of years to develop our current species and to develop the technological sophistication we now have today. The possibilities of human advancement seem limitless and the only opposition we have is ourselves. Why should humanity limit itself over genetically modified organisms? Why do people think humans have gone to far on genetic engineering? Genetic modification is the process of altering the DNA in an organism’s genome.…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic Engineering Throughout history, humans experience many changes whether it is good or bad. Some of these changes can bring issues into the world. One of these “issues” that humans know today is genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is one of the well known creations known to man kind.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Picture this: a world where everyone looks exactly the same--ridden with birth defects, religion has disappeared because people can control their environment with a simple insertion or deletion of a gene, and no one is sure of the future because every couple years, a virus that was supposed to harmlessly alter genes mutates to harmfully cause a deadly epidemic. Sound familiar? Maybe not yet, but at the rate we 're going, the world isn 't far away from the scenario just described due to the ever-increasing rate of genetic engineering occurring in today 's world. From genetically modified crops to mice that glow in the dark to bacteria that produce insulin, countless uses of genetic engineering have appeared in just a few short years, and without…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Future for Human Genetics People have been around long enough to know that everything changes (for the better or worse). Within the past few years, there has been a lot of debate over the scientific breakthrough of being able to modify the human genome. Many doctors and scientists have welcomed the idea with open minds while others are hesitant to become involved. Some see the dangers involved with the process while others see the endless possibilities coming out of this revolutionary discovery.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics