Autocratic Justice

Superior Essays
Justice applies to many facets of life; the concept has taken on a new meaning as the world enters a state of globalization, where increased dependence on other nations’ wealth and resources has resulted in unequal distribution. The central thesis of this paper is to argue that the inadequate circulation of resources and wealth can be corrected if all states submit to an autocratic regime. By applying concepts originating from Machiavelli, Rousseau, and Marx, as well as other writers; the installation of an autocratic regime will prove to be the best and most just type of system for global distribution of resources. Though arguments can be made against such a system, basic premises will support the proposed resolution to the issue. Resources, …show more content…
What is proposed is that justice, by the autocratic level of governance, is to be a concept that ensures the acknowledged feasibility in which all sates are able to give human rights. The first purpose of the regime is to insist that human rights are met by all countries, and that laws by states do not conflict with these rights. The second purpose of the autocracy is to ensure continuous -harmonious- global systems of exchange in commerce, ideas, persons, and other types of movement within the earth’s sphere; problems that Armstrong acknowledges as being global issues. The power of all states submit to this regime, where by both military and the ultimate governing authority are to submit to the autocrat, so that the regime is sure to function and the laws and ideals are applicable to all states. Resources are allocated in way that ensures these human rights can be met, as well as ways in which the states can better improve. Here it should be noted that the regime is to act as an oversight-system of governance, where all states operate as they see fit while adhering to the regulations and overall strategies that the autocratic regime has established, this includes systems of commerce and governing. It is by this way that states can continue to operate within their cultural norms, but where by justice can apply to all …show more content…
The internet can be seen as the fist step in the autocratic regime’s goal, in that the differences such as race and languages are superseded by the use of technology. Accordingly, this system has within in it the makings to further the solidarity of the world. Global Solidarity is based on what is the righteousness of life, and is achieved by recognizing these rights for life and growing interest in protecting and enhancing those lives. Theautocratic regime would be a product of the globalized efforts in ensuring that the recognized human rights of all citizens of the world is needed, and that a shared effort beyond ideology, and instead rooted in the acknowledgement of life itself.5Because most governments are rooted in their cultural norms; it can be argued that the autocratic regime would serve as an intermediate necessity in which all states are able to cooperate. As Korab-Karpowicz suggest, the unity that comes form the world’s diversity will be the key to achieving global solidarity, and that these diverse groups will need to establish a basis of core human values; under which the autocratic regime would ensure all states abide to. These values are human rights, and though states argue about what a basic human right is, some key values can be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In the modern world, there are many different countries with different systems of government. In Aldous Huxley’s utopian world, there is only one country, the “World State,” and one government, led by Mustapha Mond and the world controllers. This government system works and runs as a well-oiled machine with very little disruptions, which contributes to its success as a government. For the people of this “World State,” their government and habitations are a utopia, as is evident through the complacency of the citizens. Therefore, Mustapha Mond and the world controllers are successful in their creation of a “World State” and paradise, through the mindset of the citizens and the operation of the government.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World - Society of Imprisonment True Freedom is having the right to act, speak and think whatever one wants without any hesitation or restriction. Imprison [im-priz-uh n] to confine in or as if in a prison (dictionary, 2018) Why is it so important that freedom is achieved? The motto that shapes the World State is “Community, Identity, Stability” (p.1). The motto tricks the citizens into thinking that they have achieved the utmost freedom and are content with the way they live their lives.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The citizens of the World State are rigidly controlled and thus have no free will. When Lenina is talking to Henry Ford about the fact that regardless of their caste, all humans are equal after death, she remembers waking up in the middle of the night and hearing that “everyone works for everyone else. We can’t do without one. Even Epsilons are useful. We couldn’t do without Epsilons.”…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The novel, “Brave New World,” depicts a utopian society called the World State. Ironically, one may say, this world is far from the definition of what many may consider perfect. In this fictional society, the traditional values and moral that most in our society are accustomed to, especially during the time period which the book was published, are absent or seen as taboos. However, half a century later, not only is our society not far from the World State and implementing the wrong ideas from the novel, but also many World State ideas are mirrored by the growing terrorist group ISIS. Our society is becoming quite similar to the World State in ways that may not have been imagined back in the 1930’s.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human rights are rights entitled to everyone by birth. A list of inalienable human rights is included in the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights 1948 (Int). Bill of rights is a declaration of human rights protection and guarantees usually issued by a national government. A bill of right usually comprised of an implementation of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1996 (Int) (ICCPR) into domestic law. ICCPR is a treaty between states to recognize civil and political rights of individuals.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tyranny of Experts raises credible concerns of how supporting autocratic regimes undermines individual rights. Easterly bring up four different argument of why individual rights are being diminished in autocracies. The question I will attempt to answer is whether it is correct to support autocrats who will supposedly implement technology into their countries, or if countries like the United States should abstain from such support to protect human rights. I will first comment on each of the four sections of the book, and I will conclude that human rights are paramount, but countries like the U.S. cannot cut ties off with autocracies completely.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sangiovanni's Argument

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In this paper, I will first introduce what I believe to be the best argument for difference principle. To do this, I will compare two different arguments from Blake and Sangiovanni. They sure share some similarities, which I will reserve if I deem appropriate. But the most important point is their different empirical and normative premises. I will elaborate those differences in detail and develop my own argument.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether we like to admit or not, there are two sides to every coin. A head and a tail, a good and a bad. The same can be said for societies. For every utopia, there’s a dystopia lurking underneath that perfection. This is especially true in the society, Oceania, in George Orwell’s book, “1984.”…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three types of governments that focus on taking complete control over people’s livelihood and freedom; the three governments are totalitarianism, fascism, and socialism. The main topic of this assignment is not fascism or socialism, it is totalitarianism. A totalitarian society is ruled by a dictator that takes control over everyone’s way of living. Of course, this seems a little impossible to do. How can a government make sure everyone is doing what they are told to do?…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The source believes that totalitarianism should be used regularly in governments in order to achieve goals. They have seen from history that totalitarianism results in great changes to a country. The USSR, for example, became rapidly industrialized under communism. The author ignores the fact that with this great power came great destruction to the lives of the citizens. Totalitarianism is an ideology that believes that the government should have complete control over nearly every aspect of its citizens’ lives.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Totalitarianism is defined as a system of government that attempts to control all aspects of its society (Lansford). Throughout the past two centuries, there has been an increase in this style of government around the world. From Russia to China, from Iraq to Germany, these leaders control their countries with absolute power. Because of how powerful these leaders control is, their power must be constantly maintained and in order to do so, the leaders go to great lengths to ensure their unlimited power. Through dehumanization of their population and extreme intimidation, these twentieth and twenty first century totalitarian leaders maintained complete and total control over their countries.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Injustice

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Injustice in the Justice Department Naomi Wolf once said: “It is human nature to abuse power, no matter who you are.” Judicial corruption is dishonest or unethical conduct by a person entrusted with a position of authority in the judicial system, often to acquire personal benefit. Although abuse of judicial power still occurs in our society today, there are safeguards in place to prevent the kind of abuse that occurred during the Victorian Era.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fundamental objective of international law, to regulate the relations between sovereign states, has become a standard to evaluating the effectiveness of different approaches to international law. Various philosophical disciplines have interpreted the importance and usefulness of international law in order to establish a better understanding of how international law is to be executed. This paper will take a thorough look at how two different philosophers have explained the concepts and principles that make up international law. Specifically, analyzing how Niccolò Machiavelli and Hugo Grotius present contrasting ideas of the original principles of international law and propose different ways through which international law should be justly…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are strong opinions about democracy and the improvement of human rights. Supporters argue that democratic society creates a shared culture which improves universal respect for rights. The institutional constrictions diminish government’s capacity and willingness to violate human rights. Setting a guideline of behaviors for both the people and the government, these institutions protect universal freedom and make repression an inappropriate course of action. Besides, democratic countries are organized through some prescribed “rules of the game” and a social contract which, unlike autocratic societies, increases greater societal and political control over any undue infringement of civic and political rights.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays