The Wealth Inequality In America

Decent Essays
In analyzing the Wealth Inequality in America, there are three political approaches that can be used. All of the three approaches are categorized under political liberalism which emphasizes individualism. The first approach is libertarianism, the second approach is free market conservatism, and the third approached is liberal contractarianism.
Libertarianism is a laissez fair approach to political liberalism that advocates minimal government intervention within the lives of its citizens. The main principle for libertarianism is liberty and freedom. In analyzing wealth in America libertarianism should be neutral, but they tend to feel bad. Since libertarianism stands for liberty and freedom they should not care about the gap between the poor

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Buttonwood (2017) alerts about the grave consequences the rising wealth inequality within and between countries may have worldwide if the economics profession and the policymaker do not manage to address this problem properly. He notes that manmade ways that have brought down this problem whenever it emerged in the past was mass warfare, genuine revolution, and state collapse. Based on a dynamic wealth accumulation model, Pikkety and Saez (2014) suggest that wealth inequality starts rising when the after-tax rate of return on capital or the same, the capitalization of past wealth exceeds the growth rate of the economy. They caution against the confusion between (personal) income and wealth (factor income) inequality as the former may become…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Define Universal Suffrage

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Define universal suffrage. (5 points) Universal Suffrage pertains to the right of every adult to vote, regardless of race, sex, belief, wealth, or social status, with the exclusion of small groups.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foroohar references Joseph Stiglitz, the Columbia professor and former economic advisor to Bill Clinton when she shows how both “Republican and Democratic administrations have been at fault in crafting not only policies that forward inequality, but also a narrative that tells us that we can’t do anything about it” (Foroohar). This idea further supports the belief that the government must be challenged in order to create new laws and rules to structure our economy so that it is more balanced. Stiglitz emphasizes this idea when he explains how “it’s about the choices we make with the rules we create to structure our economy” (Foroohar). One of the reasons that the United States has not put forth effort in order to change the inevitable outcome of the lower classes, is the fact that they do not actually know how wealthy the upper class is. If the lower class was aware of the economic gap between classes there would be “riots in the streets” (Fitz).…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How did you relate to the readings, videos and forum discussions? I related to the readings about cultural and linguistic competence as a future health care provider. I saw how my knowledge of these topics could affect the care and well being of real people. One hypothetical that struck me was about a nurse practitioner choosing a cheaper and less effective medication for a black patient. The nurse had done this with the well-meaning intention of saving a poor person from the bills that come with a higher level of health care, not realizing that the patient was of a high socioeconomic status (Hall and Fields).…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The gross inequalities in income in the United States are hurting economic prosperity for everyone these days. When the rich have more money to invest, but everyone else has too little money to buy very much stuff, there's a huge risk that rich people's investments in new production will come to a halt because there's no one to buy all the things that the newest factories could theoretically produce. Therefore there's a risk of production in the real-world economy stagnating, for lack of good investment opportunities for the rich in new production. There will be also a risk of the richest investors turning to pure financial speculation, which can then lead as we saw during the time of the great recession, a huge speculative bubble in the economy…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the American government redistribute wealth? This is one of the many issues we are facing as a country today. “There are two sides to every story", as people quote often and that's the way it is in politics also. There are advantages and disadvantages to redistributing the wealth in the United States. It's important to look at both sides and then make our decision.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this has not always been the case. While college attendance is at an all time high (“College Enrollment and Work Activity of 2016 High School Graduates”), the portion of our population living in the upper class has increased by 50 percent since 1971, and the portion living in the lower class has increased 16 percent in that same time period. Consequently, wealth disparity has made it difficult for the lower classes of Americans to achieve the level of success that the highest class has. In addition, the share of aggregate income held by the upper class has increased from 29 percent to 49 percent.(“The American Middle Class Is Losing Ground”) This means that the richest portion of the population possesses nearly half of the wealth,…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most discussed topics in modern-day American politics is the rising wealth gap. This begs an appropriate question; at what point do inequalities of economic liberty and social justice become unjust? Three liberal approaches to justice attempt an answer. In his book Theory of Justice, John Rawls follows a high liberal tradition of thought, asserting that a distributive pattern of justice is most correct. On the other hand, in his book Anarchy, State and Utopia, Robert Nozick argues for an emergent approach to justice, rooted in libertarian philosophy.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Income and Wealth Inequality of America As a capitalist nation, the United State of America is facing a serious problem, which is the inequality of wealth and income. In pace with the growth of the economy, the rich people are getting richer and the poor people are getting poorer. The gap between the rich and poor is widening unprecedentedly fast. Why is that happening?…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction. Income inequality is a major problem in America today due to the lack of education and health care issues that surrounds many within our society. These issues have caused many concerns especially among African Americans. People of color often make lower wages based on their lack of education and race.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Inequality In America

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Imagine you aren't able to apply for a certain occupation or job because of your gender. Disappointing right, this is a real world problem that many humans specifically women will face in their lifetime. In America gender inequality is a huge problem that usually goes unnoticed. To help make this problem less worse I want people to be aware of gender inequality and stand up for someone they see being treated differently. The whole world is full of gender inequality, especially the United States.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a capitalistic based economy such as the United States, it creates incomes that are small and large. Having an unequal amount of large or low incomes is called income inequality. Income inequality has become a major problem in the United States, increasing 24% from 1968 to 2012” (Cochran). The gap between the rich and the poor is growing at an ever increasing rate. In the United States the gap is measured by relative poverty, or “being below one-half the nations income” (Cochran).…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today, we live in the richest country in the history of the world, but in reality the wealth is controlled by a small percentage of individuals. The issue of wealth and income equality is the great political issue of our time. The 2016 Presidential Candidates all differ from their view of equality in the election. Many of the candidates are for breaking down the barriers, and creating equality for all. The nation is now in the midst of a fascinating presidential campaign that, as always, creates an opportunity for a national debate on this very subject and specific policies for the candidates and their parties.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While it is true that personal freedom and the right to private property is something that should be protected, I cannot argue that these rights are more important than the collective good. Not only that, but the argument that everyone is responsible for what they have, and that inequality is a matter of personal finance mismanagement, is dismissive and ignores the reality of the situation. An individual could be very skilled with handling their finances, but when the cost of living or inflation rises, their savings lose their value, no matter how diligent they were with setting their money aside. In addition to this, the lower and middle classes are the ones that mainly rely on Social Security, and if they have less income, they will spend less, and will not contribute to economic growth. Not only that, the idea at its core operates under the assumption that people must work in order to be able to survive, and this simply is not a possibility for everyone; as a result, there is the implication that certain lives are less valuable than others.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Economical: According to the political spectrum, liberalism is between socialism and conservatism. Although socialism and liberalism is on the left-wing, it does not mean that liberalism agrees with the socialist system. As much as our system of capitalism is full of faults, it does not mean I totally agree with the economic system of socialism. According to Amita Shastri, the socialist state “should own and manage all wealth” and “distribute it to employ everyone to satisfy their needs” (Shastri).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays