The Way We Never Were Analysis

Improved Essays
Two people joining their lives together as one unit has existed for all of humanity.
However, what we would call a marriage in contemporary times has changed its meaning, structure, and impact since the first couple was ever brought together. Dr. Stephanie Coontz gives a lecture at Dickinson College in Pennsylvania that discusses common myths and realities about the changing nature of marriage and families throughout history.
This myth and reality comparison begins even in the title of Coontz’s talk; she immediately checks the notion that the “traditional” family has been anything more than a brief time in history that served as a short-lived placeholder for strict gender roles and a masculine power structure. Coontz addresses this by presenting
…show more content…
But while divorce was relatively simple and common then, divorce laws became so stringent over time that it became one of the strong demands of the women’s movement of the 1970s.

Erin Wagner
The Way We Never Were
Reflection Paper
The desire for divorce stems from another facet of marriage that is actually a modern occurrence, and that is free choice of a marital partner. For most of history, people were married to secure property and power, to amass wealth, and to create relatives out of strangers. Marriages were for the benefit of others, and if love followed it was only secondary. Currently, however, people have the option and benefit of marrying for love, divorcing when there is no longer love, and not marrying if love does not come. These “love marriages” have shifted the institution of marriage entirely, and Coontz argues that if we look to a bright future and not to a wrongly nostalgic past, this shift can ultimately be for the better.
The last aspect of the family that Coontz addresses both directly and through its implications throughout her entire lecture is the idea of separate spheres for men and
…show more content…
These changes are so consequential because marriage looks and works vastly differently than it did even thirty years ago, and as long as the American people are yearning for the “ideal” marriage and family that existed before social change, the new, varied, dynamic, and ever more egalitarian family will not be able to reach its full potential.
The changes have indeed caused damages to some areas of marriage; marriage is less stable, more optional, more inclusive, and doesn’t necessarily provide financial gain for either party, but as Coontz states at in the middle of her lecture, “[T]hose [changes] that make individual marriages better weaken marriage as an institution. But marriage when it works, it works.” Coontz argues that when we know how to make the good parts of marriage work better, then we know how to minimize the damage when marriage fails. The new institution of marriage needs to look ahead to the positive impact it can have rather than lose itself in what it is not anymore, or rather as Coontz sees it, the way it never was to begin

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Dr. Coontz’s talk, she discusses common myths about and the history of marriage and family. She informatively and succinctly exposes myths and terminates common misconceptions about the history of family, while explaining the current age of familial flexibility. Single parent families and stepfamilies are concepts that are typically thought out of as new occasions, however, Dr. Coontz explains how they are more traditional than we think they are. As it turns out, one-parent families were actually quite standard throughout most of history.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that in “The Cohabitation Epidemic” Neil Clark Warren does not successfully support his conclusion stating that people should be alarmed by the current situations of cohabitation epidemic between couples (Vaughn 482). The author spent a myriad of time discrediting cohabitation between couples as not the right form of trial marriage, which to me is lost in the mix. The author begins his story by explaining the social changes that have taken place during the previous decades, indicating the adverse rise of “cohabitation partner couples/ households (Vaughn 481).” Therefore, all the psychologists who possess knowledge of working with both the married and single couples must get alarmed when such cohabitation cases are…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Whats Love Got To Do With It”? A legendary song of the twentieth century and a well-fit slogan for the eighteenth century. Looking into the roots of our ancestors and the maltreatment of love has made me think of the recent generations definition of love and also the meaning of marriage. Today’s meaning of marriage include a deep and profound love between two people. Surprisingly it was nothing of what I had imagined.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Centuries ago, the marriage of two people was considered a legal agreement rather than an act of love. To marry for love was considered a dishonor toward the family, displaying affection in the public was an unwritten law that would result in shame. However, as centuries passed, times changed. It is now acceptable to marry for love, but the question is, will the couple’s love be able to withstand the hardships of life? The change within marriage can be seen in the article “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” by Stephanie Coontz, where she talks about the history of marriage and how different cultures interpret marriage, and the article “Will Your Marriage Last?” by Aviva Patz, is about his opinion on marrying for love, and how it is absurd…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis In her essay, “The Disestablishment of Marriage”, Stephanie Coontz guest columnist teacher at The Evergreen State College, illustrates the change of the standards of marriage “demanding different things from marriage then in the past” with the use of studies and data. Coontz shows the data on how the present day marriage has changed from are ancestor’s views of marriage. Coontz discuss how marriage is no longer the center institution that organizes people’s lives.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suffocation Model Essay

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article “The Suffocation Model: Why Marriage in America is becoming an All-or-Nothing Institution”, authors Eli J. Finkel, Elaine O. Cheung, Lydia F. Emery, Kathleen L. Carswell, and Grace M. Larson, discuss how the purpose of marriage has dramatically changed from originally being for the basic needs of survival to needing marriage for self-esteem and intimacy. They have concluded that marriage has followed the Suffocate Model, and this model has two possible outcomes one negative and one positive. Positive being if the marriage in present day is satisfying than the marriage will prove to be more fulfilling than a marriage in the 19th century or early 20th century. The negative consequence is that with the higher expectation for marriage…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Popenoe

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stating, “As an institution, marriage has lost much of its legal, social, economic, and religious meaning and authority.” The authors believe that marriage no longer has the same prestige that it once had and instead the meaning of marriage itself has been redefined. Popenoe and Whitehead present the article in a very logical way, explaining how ideas about marriage have evolved and using statistics to support their claims. Proposing that “ It is a sign of the times that the overwhelming majority (94%) of never married singles in our survey agreed that ‘when you marry, you want your spouse to be your soul mate, first and foremost.’” They go on to explain that this is a new…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Family Institution: Then and Now The purpose and understanding of the family institution has changed drastically since the Founders. The Founders associated marriage, specifically a stable one, with the sustainability of the family. Today marriage is less common, it happens later in life, and more of them end in divorce. Living together outside of wedlock was once prohibited, but now it is almost expected.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For Better, For Worse Stephanie Coontz wrote in the article “For better, For Worse: Marriage Means Something Different Now”, that marriage has changed recently, the values are not the same as they were in the 1960’s. When marriage was a status symbol only in the 1960’s, there were fewer problems. Because of changes to divorce laws, it is now easier to divorce than ever before, changing family dynamics as well as society. I believe that if a person makes a life long commitment, they should be held to their commitment, as they did in the 1960’s.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Changes in American Society Today, many people underestimate the value of marriage and family in America. The 21st century has seen a drastic change with new confused adding culture, language, norms, religion, persona views, experiences, different race marriage, and the environment society. To many this is a great diversity in America, and to most it is interfering with the original “American Dream”.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Stephanie Coontz’s talk at Dickinson College she discusses some common myths about the history of “the” family. She discusses not only the myths, but also several realities behind these aspects, which include single- parent families, divorce, free choice of marital partner, and separate spheres for men and women. She begins by saying that it was a complete myth that single-parent homes have been uncommon until today. In fact single parent homes were the norm for most of history because of high death rates.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the marriage culture’s foundation of sanctity and lawfulness surpassed personal importance as society and what is acceptable has changed. The interviews of almost ten years ago are shaped around a time when marriage was changing. Both Rauch and Santorum were looking at what marriage resulted…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the word marriage is heard, what definition comes to mind? After reading Stephanie Coontz’s article, The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love, the definition of marriage that most people are familiar with is different. In Coontz’s article, she explains the ideal marriage in multiple cultures and how the idea of marriage has altered after some time. It is hard to have one definition of marriage for one culture when there are many different people, therefore, is there a real definition for marriage? If there is a real definition of marriage, is there such thing as love?…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Traditionally, family may be defined as a group of people linked directly by blood relations, wherein the adults take responsibility for their young ones (Giddens, 2001, p.433). However, there has been no legitimate agreement on an exact definition. What is clearer is the definition of family structure. Family structure (what a family consists of) is an integral variable in the constitution of a society. The British society specifically, has been witness to a variety of family structures that have resulted from changes and trends that have occurred in the economy, the political policies and other such disciplines of social sciences.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divorce Reflection

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages

    CHAPTER – I INTRODUCTORY REFLECTIONS Marriage is the foundation on which the institution of family is built up. Family is the unit of society on which the super structure of entire society and stability of social institution would stand. A happy matrimonial life is undoubtedly the foundation for successful family system. On the contrary, the sick and disgruntled marital relation has their repercussion impact not merely upon the related spouses, their children.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays