The Way Of The Wordsmith Analysis

Improved Essays
The Way of the Wordsmith
By Keenan D. Davis

Nicholas Lemann’s interview; and subsequent critique of Frank Luntz’s methodology, highlighted both the simplicity and complexity of finding the right words to effectively persuade individuals not of a similar mindset. The ultimate assumption being the naivety of the individual targeted for persuasion. If one has an informed opinion on a subject it is harder to manipulate their understanding of it with empty rhetoric. Too often the general public will elect officials who implement policies based on their presentation rather than effectiveness or benefit. However history has shown us repeatedly that the vast majority of potential constituents rarely truly grasp the magnitude of the policies
…show more content…
Luntz’s focus groups the participants are asked to give their opinion on inheritance taxes, many of them didn’t have a good understanding of what it was. Even after having it explained to them, because it was presented as a “Death” tax they wanted it abolished. Despite the fact that they themselves would not likely be affected either way, the presentation of the tax lead them to lean in a direction that didn’t necessarily benefit them. To further expand on his theory that presentation is key to persuasion, Luntz rearranges the order of Ross Perot’s political ads. A man who was viewed as an inspirational rag-to-riches success story is now viewed in an unfavorable light. Which in turn inspires Luntz to opine “the order in which you give information determines how people think”. This would seem to support Mr. Lemann’s opinion that “if you introduce a subject using language that will produce a strong opinion no subsequent information will get people to change their minds.” Mr. Luntz appears to echo this same sentiment, as evidenced by his affinity for “1984” author George Orwell. Who in the words of Lemann “presented the manipulation of language as one of the scariest features of a totalitarian society.” Which is to say that feelings, being a stronger influence in relation to perception than fact or logic, can be manipulated by those with a greater understanding of language and the emotions they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Othello’s inability to see through Iago’s facade and intentions lead to his end. If Othello was able to properly read Iago, he wouldn’t have put so much trust in Iago’s words. In life things are commonly lost in translation and information is presented to draw the reader to one conclusion. The media frequently uses information in a bias way to help one party and often tries to lure people into one view. Even politicians commonly say things that sound good, but most time, it’s an act to help strengthen their campaign or have voters re-elect them for office.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hillary Clinton Debate

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Trump started out strong and composed but I think he lost his temperament throughout the night. He accused Clinton of not having a good temperament but from the debate that I watched I witnessed the opposite. As the other editorials have stated, along with Tory Newmyer, Trump came out strong in the beginning, but it soon went downhill from there. Newmyer stated that, “Clinton moved from the start to stick Trump in his softest spot: his business dealing.” Trump is all about his businesses and investments. Along with all the other editorials I have read Newmyer also brought up the point that Trump might be avoiding releasing his tax returns because he is hiding something.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Arizona Free Enterprise Club v Bennett the plaintiffs held that their speech was chilled because they knew they would not be able to outraise their competition. The Court agreed with their novel argument and struck down the provision because “trigger mechanism created a burden on the speech of independent groups and privately financed candidates” (Ansolabehere, 2011). This seems antithetical to the notion the current Court has put forth that more speech is better because the trigger mechanism engenders more spending (speech) from each side. Campaign finance reform advocates still have hope for the trigger mechanism because the decision in Arizona was “fairly narrow” and trigger funding public finance systems that have used “grants” or “small-donor” matching have not been challenged in court (Miller,…

    • 1311 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of Lie

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Indeed, today we all live in the post-truth era where objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotions and personal beliefs. This is a problem itself, but it is aggravated by its dramatic impact on society. A perfect illustration is Brexit: the Remain campaign featured factual arguments based on proofs in the form of block graphs and pie charts, but they conceded to the Leavers who exploited people's emotions and especially their irrational fear of “the other”. As a result, the Leavers succeeded, but soon after those who voted for Brexit realized that they…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moore also tends to oversimplify complex problems. Near the end of the film he makes it clear that he believes capitalism is the opposite of a democracy, and does not support it. He uses many examples to get his point across and is very thorough at times. However, he does not recommend socialism and he does not think that Obama has brought significant change. Instead of stating what he wants to see changed, he shames corporations that he believes exploit Americans.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although truth can be subjective, it is necessary for society to advance. Truth progresses through history, we can only know truth through objections over time. For Mill, limiting individual freedoms could result in a situation where “...[people] are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth” (Mill, 19). Mill believes that people are hurt by silencing ideas that could possibly be true. Without allowing all ideas to be heard, people can easily fall into a false sense of security that what they believe is true because of the opinions of the majority.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The people separated from the government slowly by infiltration occurring from the seclusiveness that the political issues appear to hold. America is not as strong in mutual unification of freedom but rather more, every man for himself, which is a predecessor of what Yates predicted. In a way his want of more representatives, is excellently disprove by Madison and Hamilton showing that you need less representatives because with more there is udder chaos, and no real solution can be achieved with so many people and opinions. Altogether, Yates’s letter proved very eye opening and insightful for eventually problems needing better solutions and conclusions in order to protect the rights of the…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Primarily the designed objective of interviews are seen lacking in the final outcome as they are persuaded to conform to society and perform artificially in these situations and only act out the role that is expected of them. Initially Interviews can predict prominent behaviours early on but generally speaking it will not accurately predict the candidates behaviour or performance based on a minor and insignificant interview. Research has failed to provide conclusive evidence that interviews significantly add to the validity of the personnel selection…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Combination Of Evil Essay

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although the majority of people agree that what Martin is doing is immoral and selfish, some people don’t share the same viewpoint and think he is doing “good” compared to how Bill Gates chooses to help out society with his wealth by helping out those who are in need and less fortunate than himself. While finding a moral high ground on every issue now a days is practically impossible in today “Politically Correct” society along with everyone varied opinions. So where do we draw the line between “good and evil”? We cannot, the line for everybody is based on their own principles and morals on the situation that is…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Herbert Hoover criticized Roosevelt’s New Deal because it harmed the liberty of the nation and he proposed to endow the business with more freedom. However, capitalism had its own disadvantages and it could not always run well. Therefore, moderate intervention of the government was necessary. Minnie Hardin admitted that the original intention of the policies on relief was good, but the policies did not work well when implemented. The reliefers took the relief for granted and wasted the taxpayers’ money.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays