Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

Improved Essays
The period after the War of 1812 was christened the Era of Good Feelings because of the nationalistic spirit, high morale, and unfamiliar cooperation among politicians that flourished during the time. Following the War of 1812, the Democratic-Republicans established an essentially one-party system, embracing some of the policies of the inactive Federalist Party and thereby eliminating hostility between the two parties. Although there was a rising spirit of nationalism and morale, the Era of Good Feelings was also marked by sectionalism, divisions within the Democratic-Republican Party, and strife over tariffs, the national bank, and internal improvements. The growing sectionalism can be attributed to both the friction between the North and …show more content…
The main reason that Calhoun believed the United States needed a system of roads and canals, besides his Democratic-Republican bias, was that he believed that the large size of the United States was going the cause disunion (Doc. B). As evidenced by the map in Document E, the United States was growing west very quickly. This growth contributed to sectional conflict over slavery. People thought that slavery would gradually die off because exhaustion of soil in slave states would make it impossible. However, this did not happen because of advancements, such as the cotton gin, and progression west. The North and the South were at odds due to worry over how the addition of new territories would affect the balance of slave states and free states in Congress. The Missouri Compromise, created to help maintain the balance, furthered the division between the North and the South. In a letter to John Randolph, a Democratic-Republican, Thomas Jefferson asserted his belief that the Missouri Compromise was only a temporary solution that would continue to perpetuate the issue of slavery (Doc. F). Jefferson was a founding father fervently against slavery, so he was biased against the formation of the Missouri Compromise and the growing sectionalism. At this time, feelings of nationalism had dwindled due to the Panic of 1819, and the issue of slavery amplified the division between

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Apush Chapter 12 Outline

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12 The Second War for Independence and the Upsurge of Nationalism 1812-1824 On to Canada over Land and Lakes The Americans tried to invade Canada from Detroit, Niagara, and Lake Champlain. All were fought off by the Canadians.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will discuss the impact that John C. Calhoun had on antebellum Politics and the issue of slavery. John C. Calhoun born March 18, 1782 and died on March 31 1850, was a noteworthy U.S. statesman and spokesman for the slave-plantation system of the antebellum South. As a juvenile congressman out of South Carolina, he assisted converting the United States into war with with Great Britain and initiated the Second Bank of the United States. He tried to be a candidate for presidency in 1824, but was an object…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before this conciliation, sectionalism seemed to be on an increasing rise in popularity. This compromise delayed the Civil War by several decades.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war. One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B).…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the early and mid-1800s, sectional tensions arose throughout America. Sectionalism, or the loyalty to a particular subsegment of the Nation, rather than loyalty to the United States as a whole, was a pervasive characteristic of this period. Many factors contributed to these sectional tensions, however, the most divisive factor among the parties was the controversy over slavery. Slavery during this time was largely well-accepted in the South, but typically denigrated in the North. When the institution of slavery was condemned and threatened by the North, many southerners felt that their very survival and way of life was at risk.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Until the following presidential election, where the second Adams would win in a hotly debated contest among four men, the popular vote didn’t exist, and so the vote cannot represent the sentiments of Americans outside of the country’s capital (Doc 6). The seeds of disunion had already been sown, and the issue that would eventually uproot the Union was spreading political tension. In 1820 in a personal letter, past-president Thomas Jefferson admitted to terror over the “knell” of the union, a spreading irritation which would only grow stronger, referring to the issue of slavery between North and South states and what would soon go into law as the Missouri Compromise (Doc 5). A political leader and statesman, Jefferson foresaw the chafing irritation that the Compromise line would soon draw, and foretold, down the line, the eventuality of Civil War. He himself remarked that although the conflict was minimal, it wouldn’t stay that way (Doc 5).…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Civil War predictable? Did any events indefinitely cause the South to desire a split from the North? The North and the South had a growing tension between them for many reasons, and the northern abolitionists encouraged a Civil War through their actions of protest. Although many Americans were affected minimally by the changes of the nation, abolitionists inevitably foresaw a Civil War because the growing tensions between the North and the South became apparent in political and social changes, slavery issues, and the growing occurrence of rebellions. Political and social changes occurred in many ways, including The Second Great Awakening, Lincoln’s presidential election to office, the way the North and the South dealt with one another,…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1800s tension was beginning to build between the north and south over the issue of slavery. Three major compromises helped contribute to these tensions and lead to eventual war. These are the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. These compromises and their effects had major consequences that shaped the nation of their time.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of slavery has long been viewed as the primary cause of the American Civil War. However, slavery is only a portion of the conflict that caused the Civil War. The four developments that contributed to the Civil War were the sectional dispute over the extension of slavery into the western territories, the breakdown of the political party system, the growing cultural differences in the views and lifestyles of southerners and northerners and the intensifying emotional and ideological polarization between the regions over losing their way of life and sacred republican rights at the hands of the other. Slavery was not the only issue culminating in the Civil War but is widely accepted, though superficial. Territorial expansion in the…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the contrary, Calhoun points out that “the North has absolute control over the government [while] the interests of the South will be sacrificed to the North” (United States). Particularly, the North wanted to abolish slavery. To balance the North and South, the North would have to amend the Constitution to restore power to the South. The ongoing debate on slavery put into prospective each state regarding its laws on the admission or ban of slaves. With its growing population and necessity for more natural resources, Americans wanted the United States to expand westward to increase its power and productivity.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The end of the war ushered in a new era of nationalism and allowed America to progress industrially. Before the War of 1812 had officially begun there was animosity that had forced the country to take opposing sides. Jeffersonian Republicans believed heavily in the war efforts. They considered England’s repeated disregard to their maritime laws as an insult to the nation’s honor.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays