Foreign Policy Motivation In The Peloponnesian War

Improved Essays
A Path To War: A Critique of “‘Chiefly for Fear, Next for Honour, and Lastly For Profit’: An Analysis of Foreign Policy Motivation in the Peloponnesian War”
What caused Athens to clash with Sparta? Democracy, Imperialism, Greed, Patriotism… several of these acted as variables on the road to the Peloponnesian War, but fear was a guiding lantern. Chittick and Freyberg-Inan start by laying out different types of reactions people have to threats in the international environment and pointing out the three main types of motives in making “foreign policy decisions”, which they say are fear, profit, and social recognition (Chittick 70). Using this base, they set out to discuss and analyze the reasons for the second Peloponnesian War. They make it
…show more content…
Our purpose in examining each of these occasions in some detail is both to determine which attitudes towards which foreign policy motives and goals were expressed on each occasion and to understand how the relative potency of motives helped determine decisions and actions at these critical junctures”. They discuss each debate in chronological sequence, starting with the debate over the Corcyrean Alliance (433 BC): this deals with the allegations that Corinth puts forth in an attempt to draw Sparta into the war. The debate is in Athens and most of the debaters are Athenians representing Corinth, and Corcyra. According to Chittick and Freyberg-Inan, this discourse illustrates all three of the aforementioned foreign policy motivators. The Athenians basically negotiate to acquire an ally while simultaneously protecting their own interests (Chittick 77-78). The two debate at the Lacedaemonian Congress. (432 BC): The took place at the Congress in Sparta. The first debate, Corinthians try to persuade Sparta to go to war. They employ the “‘honour’” tactic by comparing the greedy nature of Athens’ empire, and the passive nature that has taken hold in Sparta. Athenians deny any possibility that they are a danger to Sparta. In the second debate, the Spartans discuss among themselves the danger of Athens. King Archidamus thinks the threat posed is meager and circumstantial, not warranting a military intervention (Chittick 79-80). Then in the fifth year, there took place another round of negotiations. The debate over Mytilene (427 BC): After a Mytilene rebel is thwarted, Cleon, leader of the Athenian war party, thinks that all the males should be put to death, and Diodotus disagrees. One of the motivations of this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Peloponnesian War by the end of the fifth century before the common era commenced with Sparta’s fear of Athens’ rising power. Sparta a primitive, economically challenged land power, led the independent states. In contrast, Athens an advanced, economically wealthy sea power, oversaw alliance states. Even though they both were state super powers, there was a noticeable difference in their culture, economic background and how they led the subordinate states of government. As well as, Sparta’s and Athens’ strategic approach to war, in the beginning, was dissimilar but in the end, the tables would turn and the Sparta would be victorious.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importantly, the Athenians do not disagree on principle. Instead, they say that it is the Spartans that would defeat them, not their subjects alone, and the Spartans would not be disposed to treat them terribly. This admittance seriously undermines the Athenian Thesis’ claim that justice is only relevant “between equals in power,” as the Athenians implicitly confess that arguments of justice could perhaps benefit them; they just don’t believe that those particular circumstances will arise. Justice and perceptions of justice, then, are relevant between those in unequal power – the Athenians only deny it to the Melians because that position is expedient to them. Thus, this disproves the universality of the claim that justice is only relevant between those equal in power.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Athens and Sparta were both Greek city-states that played major roles from the beginning of time. But, Athens could not compare with Sparta in terms of military power. Sparta was a militaristic society, meaning that the Spartan community largely focused on the troops in order to have a strong fighting force. The military was in charge of a Spartan citizen’s life from the moment they were born. When a Spartan child was born, they…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Sparta

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Athens might have thought that they were superior to Sparta in all areas, but they only surpassed Sparta in intellect. In the context of survival, Sparta’s army trumped Athens’ superior intellect in many ways. They demonstrated that their army was one of the most powerful forces of the time by using the geographical features of the land to their advantage, training and sustaining healthy soldiers, and, in the end, defeating one of the most respected and supported city-states of ancient Greece. The fact that Sparta was able to use the possibility of attacking Athens by land during the Peloponnesian War to their advantage indicates that they had strong military strategies that were of higher rank than their neighbor. By having a government in which no singular individual was in rule within the city-state of Athens, the leaders of this civilization were not able to put the majority of their work and effort into military strategy, leading to the end of Athenian reign over the Greek world.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pericles Funeral Oration

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pericles makes it clear that Athens is superior to Sparta. He says, “If I have dwelt at some length upon the character of our country, it has been to show that our stake in the struggle is not the same as theirs who have no such blessings to lose.” Those who fought, “thought fit to act boldly and trust in themselves. Thus, choosing to die resisting, rather than to live submitting”, they would have rather…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout human history millions of people have died for their countries, leaving loved ones and fellow citizens to question whether this ultimate sacrifice was warranted. The number of deaths resulting from war is immense, and often results in a collective examining of the governments for which these individuals perished. This contemplation can range from the quality of life a state affords its people to the ideals on which it was founded. After the first year of the Peloponnesian War, Pericles attempts to alleviate these concerns when eulogizing the dead. Similarly, after the Battle of Gettysburg, Lincoln speaks of the government for which the soldiers died.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Athens, Sparta, and Thebes all failed to create a lasting “Greek Empire.” While each polis had its own strengths and weaknesses, the poleis all failed for similar reasons. The poleis failed mainly due to almost constant power struggles, arrogance, and involvement in conflicts they should not have been involved in. Athens, Sparta, and Thebes all failed in spite of various strengths and due to various weaknesses. Athens’ strengths included its large size, large trireme navy, wealth, and democratic government.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicias and the Importance of Persuasive Leadership How did Nicias fail to convince the Athenian assembly that the Sicilian Expedition was a strategic error? His arguments, while valid and logical, are not sufficient to win over the assembly to undo their vote of war. Not only does Thucydides have incomplete information about these events, but Thucydides’ prior knowledge of Nicias’s failure colors the way he reconstructs Nicias’s ineffective arguments against war. Nicias attempts to dissuade the assembly from a war it has already approved by discussing the lack of a compelling reason to aid the Egesteans, the challenge of conquering and ruling Sicily, and the fragile truce with Sparta. Because Nicias’s appeals are ultimately unsuccessful, Thucydides uses this failure as an example of ineffective leadership in the Athenian state.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A main figure acting as an external force against all sides involved in the Wars, is Alcibiades. He influenced multiple people and was highly appreciated in numerous nations, giving him a wide berth for manipulation of important figures to cater to his own plans. Involved in the Peloponnesian conflict since the battle involving Potidaea, Alcibiades’ ideas were respected among influential persons; given the fact that he had been brought up by esteemed member of society, Socrates (Krentz, 2003). Showing his political strength in Athenian court, Alcibiades overruled current acting general Nicias’ logical judgements on proposed expeditions such as Sicily (where he outlined the fact that it would be a work of great difficulty), for his own personal gain…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Greek democracy appears to have ended as a result of both internal and external factors. Like the subsequent Roman Empire, the Athenian state appears to have over-reached in its militaristic ambitions, ultimately weakening it; while the relative strength of other empires enabled them to take Greece over. The imposition of rule by foreign empires finally ended Greek democracy. From internally, Athens moved from being a defender of its own nation to an aggressor though it would have no doubt maintained that this was in its national security interests. One of the consequences of this aggression and ambition was the loss of the alliances that had helped repel the Persians and in some cases their subjugation (Brand, n.d., p.28).…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of his biggest rivals in the beginning of his public career was Aristides, who is said to have “always aimed at securing the utmost advantage for the state,” unlike Themistocles whose only concern was his own furtherance (Plutarch 79). After gaining enough influence, Themistocles had Aristides ostracized and also bribed Epicydes into declining the leadership of the Athenian forces, actions that create an image of a man driven by uncontrollable competitiveness and not by concern for the good of his people. With these two opponents out of the way, Themistocles was free to exercise his own schemes during the Persian wars. While Themistocles’ supervision did result in victory for the Greeks, it also enflamed his arrogance. After the war, Themistocles “carried his ambition to its furthest limit,” which created growing opposition towards himself (Plutarch 94).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Despite the improbability of their success (Whidden; Lecture 9.20.17), they asserted they “ [stood] for what is right against what is wrong…” a metaphor for their value of honor over ease (HPW 5.104). Until that point, it was apparent Athenian war involved minimal discussion and maximum coercion. Melians were, to our knowledge, the first of Athens’ ventures to be given a say in the matter, and they chose to indulge in war in the name of honor. In this case, the decision leads to carnage nonetheless, but is a turning point. The humanity of men once again obstructs the traditional course of war (the course in which “the strong [Athens] do what they have the power to do and the weak [Melos] accept what they have to accept.”), proving these ancient cultures had some limitations on what they were willing to partake in when it came to conflict.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Socrates must be punished, there is no other way to save the Athenian way of life, for he praises the Lacedaemonians, our sworn enemy in these dark times.” Demetrius may be hot headed and not the most reasonable character, but he does have a point. Socrates praises those Oligarchic Spartans, and undermines our Athenian Democracy.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whether there was to be war or not was irrelevant to the Athenians as Melos held no form (or very limited) of military and political power (Ahrensdorf, 1997). It is difficult to relay the points of pacifism onto…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Athenian Democracy Essay

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The development of Athenian democracy was influenced by complex social, economic, and military issues, not to mention the obvious political aspect. However, even among these complex set of factors, one aspect in the development of Athenian democracy that stands out and affects all three sets of issues is warfare. Warfare was a constant in ancient Greece, and indeed most of the ancient world. City-states constantly fought, mostly against each other, though they would often band together against outside threats such as the Persians. The Greek style of warfare also tended to be fairly homogenous throughout the city-states as well, with an infantry formed from hoplites, and in the fifth century and later, a navy.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays