Is The Constitution A Wrong Step In Making The New Republic?

Superior Essays
After breaking free of Britain 's tyranny the thirteen colonies were ready to build a new government based on their ideals. Colonists created the Articles of Confederation as document of their new government, but articles was too weak to pay debts or fight other nations. So the delegates got together to construct a new constitution. This constitution changed the nation and is culture we all follow today. Everyone in America has the ability to vote for their president and their representatives instead of monarchy that single man can hold and pass the power to other family members. Everyone in America believes in freedom that everyone is born with and rights that protect them instead of the government having power to do what it wants and that …show more content…
The Anti-Federalists are against it and want a stronger state government. They have many fears about Constitution especially since it didn 't have Bill of Rights when it was ratified. One of people against ratifying the Constitution is Patrick Henry who gave speech for it. Henry sees himself as a guardian over rights and liberty. He didn’t get to go to the convention where the Constitution was being made and he saw this as America being in great danger. Henry believes that Constitution would exclude four states from joining the union since it took nine states to ratify the Constitution, and once it was ratified it would break all the treaties with foreign powers that were made under the Articles of Confederation. What if Constitution is wrong step in making the new republic government that they worked hard on, then all of people’s rights are lost and tyranny is made again. This is main fear of Anti-Federalists that the rights of people would be squashed by central government. Henry didn’t see any danger to US to cause government to make the Constitution and change. He explains that liberty is the core of American society and what allowed them to overcome many problems, but he is scared that liberty will be lost because America will become an empire with tyranny. That checks and balance system won 't exist or work. If the Constitution is ratified then congress who is made up people who don’t care about people 's interest could use the many implied powers to do what they want. An example he gives is that what if congress decides to free slaves in name of public defence then that would lead to government abolishing slavery. Most of congress is in north and not in south where slavery is. Most of Anti-Federalists are from south and protect slavery their worst fear is abolishing slavery and that 's why they wanted stronger state government to protect

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    during this time there was a great divide between the Federalists and the Anti-federalists the Anti-federalists opposed the the constitution, they believed the president and government have too much power. The federalists supported a strong central government and believed the state should not have more power than central government. The farmers wanted to a stronger federal government because they were already broke and under the Articles of Confederation the economic problems were only getting worse. So by creating the constitution this allowed most farmers to live without struggle, the constitution didn’t really hurt anyone because it helped economically, gave us a better judiciary system and also made voting…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution attacks the rights of the people. In Patrick Henry’s speech to the Virginia Ratification Congress on June, 7 1788, Patrick Henry strongly opposes the ratification of the new constitution. He considers the Constitution to be an attack on liberty, because it strengthens the national, or central, government. Henry expects the government, especially the President, to turn tyrannical, and expects the United States to transform into a dictatorial state because of the absolute powers granted to Congress and the President. Henry specifically critiques the power of the Congress to maintain a standing army and directly tax the people, and the President’s power to control the judicial system and military.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists argued that a stronger national government must be accompanied by explicit safeguards against tyranny. The Anti-Federalists supported states’ rights. 20. What were the Federalists Papers and why were they so critical to ratification of the Constitution?…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Katie Beal Mr.Kreimer Government 13 October Patrick Henry I’m Patrick Henry and I am an Anti-Federalist because I am strongly against the Constitution. I didn't like the fact that it didn't have a Bill Of Rights for the states, and I feared that it gave the government way too much power. I thought that it would trample the rights of the states. I opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and I now I am opposing the ratification of the constitution. I am ashamed to see that this is even becoming an option when I; myself fought so hard to get us independence.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolution is over a decade past; it’s 1787, the United States is currently using the Articles of Confederation. The recent events of Shay’s rebellion show us that the Articles of Confederation is inefficient and fails to protect people's natural rights. This raises a concern that the Articles of Confederation should be replaced by the new Constitution. We should ratify the Constitution to better protect people's natural rights. Amos Singletary, a Massachusetts representative, is against the ratification (Doc1).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution DBQ The American Revolution and the years following it led to changes in American society politically, economically, socially and geographically. After the American Revolution, the government of America was created and changed. The first form of government in America was the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In regards to those in favor of the Constitution, Federalists were those who viewed the…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays