Kantian And Aristotelian Analysis

Superior Essays
The challenge of determining what is considered morally permissible is daunting. Perhaps even more intimidating is conveying which people are worthy of the most moral praise; in other words, deciding which people who commit moral actions actually deserve the moral worth to be had from those actions. There are two views precisely on this idea that I will analyze. The first view, associated with Kantians, is based on duty, (Kant, 320) while the second view, associated with Aristotelians, is based on virtue (Aristotle, 130). The view generally associated with Kantians and the view generally associated with Aristotelians both have their similarities and differences; those which make them appealing, and those which make them clash with one another. In this paper I’ll argue for reasons why the Aristotelian view is more capable of accurately describing who the most impressive moral agent is overall. First I’ll briefly describe each of the views with a little more depth. The Kantian view to describing the most notable moral agent is quite simple: the view suggests that the most impressive moral agent is the one who acts out of duty—one who acts out of some moral obligation—as opposed to someone who acts out of inclinations, such as instinctive reactions or emotions. The Aristotelian view, on the other hand, suggests that the most impressive moral …show more content…
Instinctively, without much thought, Sarah sprints to the child and shoves him out of a vehicle’s way, saving the child’s life. This act was very brave—you could even say it was virtuous—even though it was instinctive, and so to the Aristotelian view, Sarah would be considered the most impressive moral agent. However, according to the Kantian view, because Sarah hadn’t given much thought to her duty in saving this child’s life, she acted on inclinations, and so this does not make her the most impressive moral

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In accordance with Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I will argue that ethical actions should be judged by good will alone. By comparing the theories of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, I will conclude that Kant’s theories are more realistic in regards to the nature of humans. Immanuel Kant argues that one’s good intentions should be the deciding factor in judging their actions no matter the outcome. What is beneficial about this is that it allows for the expression of the intrinsic values of a person. Since every person has different virtues and opinions, they can act in any way they choose.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    art IIII: Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant published A Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) five years after Bentham’s Principles of Morals and Legislations, launching a scathing critique of utilitarianism. Kant proposed that a moral action does not suggest treating individuals as a means to an end. What Kant means by this is that we treat individuals for the sake of something else (means), such as Dudley and Stephens treating Parker as a means to maximise happiness. Instead, a moral action is one that treats individuals as ends in themselves, one that does not account for external influences such as happiness. Individuals are worthy of dignity and respect not because we own our bodies and minds but because we are rational beings, capable of reason and conscious thought.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunat Vs Kant

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the other hand, Kant valued the internal reasoning behind external actions instead of the consequences associated with them. He would begin making ethical decisions by first asking specific questions that reflected his core values. Kant sought to make decisions that was best for everyone equally and that promotes the essentials for each individual (x)? So, Kant would counsel the individual to ask what decision is best for everyone. Would saving the five individuals by risking or causing the death of one person be the best for everyone, specifically the person[s] who would die?…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, Kant’s ethics are based on deontology, meaning they are not situational. He believed that morality was determined by set guidelines and codes of behavior, and should be followed to the latter regardless of the situation. Kant left no room for exceptions; something a good number of thinkers has considered lack of common sense. Aristotle on the other hand argued that morality is a midpoint between two extremes, hence his ethics were considered a bit teleological since they could be adjusted to fit specific situations. Aristotle also claimed that an individual could be considered virtuous as long as they chose morally upright action for the sake of greatest good.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Response Paper Chapter Twelve In the twelfth chapter of The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels talk about the questions philosophers ask about character, then he discusses the virtues and Virtue Ethics. Instead of the ancient (Aristotle) asking What traits of character make someone a good person? , modern moral philosophers asked What is the right thing to do? This led modern moral philosophers to develop theories of rightness and obligations.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper about ethical theories and cases I chose to discuss the positions of John Mill and Immanuel Kant, due to their dissimilar views on morality and ethical theories. From the four cases, I chose to apply the two philosopher’s theories to case number two. This case states the dilemma “My full-time (but not live-in) babysitter hinted that she would like to use my address to enroll her daughter in my excellent local public elementary school; her neighborhood school is awful. The alternative is for her to send her daughter to private school, a financial burden but not an impossibility. Should I offer my address?”…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, despite its influence, Kantian ethics seems to have several weaknesses. First, since people are emotional beings, reason and rationality is usually not enough to motivate them act morally. Another weakness is that Kant’s categorical imperative allows for much mistreatment of animals that should not be considered morally right. Therefore, although Kantian ethics provides many strong arguments, one should always critically evaluate the ideas that are presented, especially when it deals with such a subtle and controversial issue as…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays