The Verdict Of Socrates ' Execution Essay

1533 Words Sep 15th, 2016 7 Pages
Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it. He allots a significant amount of time to enlighten the jury on his views regarding death; in particular, he reflects on matters of virtue, the uncertainty which coincides with dying, as well as the religious connotations of death. Socrates expresses a tone of nobility and intellectual curiosity when discussing the likely possibility of his own termination, which presents the notion of death in a positive light and inevitably sways the jury in favor of his conviction.
As a major proponent of always doing that which is morally right, Socrates finds the ubiquitous fear of death to be both vain and futile. In addressing the jury, Socrates asserts: “You are wrong, sir, if you think that a man who is any good at all should take into account the risk of life or death; he should…

Related Documents