The most supportive side are the Republican and the least supporters the Democrats. According to the research done by Pew, it indicated clearly that those who supported the use of drones to strike, Somalia, Yemen, and Pakistan were more. The research indicated that 61% of the American populations are in favor of the use of drones. The statistics drip down to affect political stand whereby the Democrats were rated at 59% in support, the independent at 60% and the Republican hitting the highest mark of about 69% (Henderson, 2011). Also other researches’ that were done by Gallup organization and Christian Science Monitor/TIPP has corresponded results. That means that the majority of the American supports the use of drones to fight terror. I therefore strongly addressed the Democrats, to stop fighting against the truth about the use of drones and join forces with the American government to fight terror in the world by the use of drones (Henderson, 2011). Even though they may have a counter argument that drones are unpopular to the affected countries, this is an upper hand to American to stop terror. Also, the counter argument of the Democrats is that they said that drones target militias and kills more civilians. But the truth of the matter is those terrorists are cleared from the face of the world. I, …show more content…
The fatal deaths of the civilians are reduced when drones are used because, drones only combats the indented militia (Atkinson & Project Management Institute, 2014). Drones are manufactured with such accurate technology in that it enhances drones effectiveness (Drones, 2014). But according to statistics, the Democrats may argue that it is estimated that 174 to 1, o47 civilians were killed in during Sep. 11, 2001 attack in Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan attack by the United States. it has been estimated to about 8-17% by the drones (Atkinson & Project Management Institute, 2014). But compared to World War II, the number of the civilians who died in ground