He is honored for his “tenderness of heart” and the “humanity of [his] disposition,” illustrating his empathetic nature (Poe 695). The narrator comments that his parents had “a great variety of pets” that he spent most of his time with (695). As seen in literature during the Antebellum Era, both pro-slavery and anti-slavery authors compared slaves to animals to emphasize their stance on slavery. Anti-abolitionists, specifically, used this comparison to demonstrate that slaves were viewed as pets to slave-owning families. Poe manipulates this perspective to symbolize the narrator’s family-owned slaves as pets. Yet, unlike most slave-owners, the narrator is “fond of animals” and delighted when “feeding and caressing them,” thus, showing his benevolent morality towards those socially inferior to him, or his “pets” (Poe
He is honored for his “tenderness of heart” and the “humanity of [his] disposition,” illustrating his empathetic nature (Poe 695). The narrator comments that his parents had “a great variety of pets” that he spent most of his time with (695). As seen in literature during the Antebellum Era, both pro-slavery and anti-slavery authors compared slaves to animals to emphasize their stance on slavery. Anti-abolitionists, specifically, used this comparison to demonstrate that slaves were viewed as pets to slave-owning families. Poe manipulates this perspective to symbolize the narrator’s family-owned slaves as pets. Yet, unlike most slave-owners, the narrator is “fond of animals” and delighted when “feeding and caressing them,” thus, showing his benevolent morality towards those socially inferior to him, or his “pets” (Poe