According to Bar, (2002) the Upper Paleolithic is the process that changed from middle Paleolithic to Upper Paleolithic. This process was typically considered mainly as the major revolution of its kind in the first history of human evolution. The concept represented an observable event in parts of Eurasia; however its presence across other regions was not effectively noticed. The events included the biological, cultural, technological as well as environmental and geographical features/event of change. The optimal levels of the assemblages and the occurrence of arch-types of modern societies and the issues related to modern behaviors exhibit ancient archaic behaviors,(Bar 2002). The main causes for the Upper revolution are mentioned from the
…show more content…
1987). However, there should be a limited comparison in between the same length of time frame. In order to speed up the identification of the Upper Paleolithic revolution and the ideas of manifestations, it is only the 30 ka of that of late middle Paleolithic revolution should be taken into account. It is said that the time before the revolution may give silent signs or indications that can be deployed in ensuring changes, (Chase et al. …show more content…
1992).
Addressing the criticisms from supporters of other positions
There are hypothesis that covered the transition during the late of middle Paleolithic that unfolded the Upper Paleolithic, I clearly analyzed the characteristics the Upper Paleolithic revolution, as statistically analyzed by some archaeologists with varying comments about their uniqueness and the appearance during the period of middle Paleolithic, (Ammerman et al. 1984). Though there is a number of documented component materials and their inter as well as intra-settlement designs are typically denoted from western, Europe and northern Asia. However, few of the cases are well known to have sparsely traveled from east and south Asia or even sub Saharan African parts(Chase et al. 1987).However, the current events shows some inherent bias, in spite of the same events, it can be noted that within the continental part of the northern hemisphere there exists a mosaic of some cultural thought or feelings, and the aspects of the known Upper Paleolithic revolution which was denoted typically from western part of Europe were shared not by all people, (Ambrose
1987). However, there should be a limited comparison in between the same length of time frame. In order to speed up the identification of the Upper Paleolithic revolution and the ideas of manifestations, it is only the 30 ka of that of late middle Paleolithic revolution should be taken into account. It is said that the time before the revolution may give silent signs or indications that can be deployed in ensuring changes, (Chase et al. …show more content…
1992).
Addressing the criticisms from supporters of other positions
There are hypothesis that covered the transition during the late of middle Paleolithic that unfolded the Upper Paleolithic, I clearly analyzed the characteristics the Upper Paleolithic revolution, as statistically analyzed by some archaeologists with varying comments about their uniqueness and the appearance during the period of middle Paleolithic, (Ammerman et al. 1984). Though there is a number of documented component materials and their inter as well as intra-settlement designs are typically denoted from western, Europe and northern Asia. However, few of the cases are well known to have sparsely traveled from east and south Asia or even sub Saharan African parts(Chase et al. 1987).However, the current events shows some inherent bias, in spite of the same events, it can be noted that within the continental part of the northern hemisphere there exists a mosaic of some cultural thought or feelings, and the aspects of the known Upper Paleolithic revolution which was denoted typically from western part of Europe were shared not by all people, (Ambrose