The Un's Role In The Syrian Civil War

The world today is getting more peaceful and cooperative. Yet, there are places where wars are still happening. In a democratic way, it is believed that people of a nation are the ones who have the authority to control the government. Politicians believe that international actors, more specifically the international institutions such as the United Nations, hold the central authority. The arguments keep going; as such all actors wish to be involved in making the decisions of a governmental system. However when aiming for a successful peacekeeping worldwide, the intrastate governments are ideally the ones who have the absolute authority of taking control of conflicts within a state and/or amongst states. From there, the ideal peaceful world can be achieved.

War cannot happen without the presence of …show more content…
The more the country is laid hold of by communism, the less the government will hear of what the people say. Next, the international institutions as the global level actors like the United Nations. These international organisations usually exist to maintain peace amongst their members and only take actions when needed, such as being the mediator for all actors to communicate in the Syrian Civil War. The UN interferes with the conflict because the government is considered unable, by the international system, to control the on-going war with the non-state actors (rebel groups) and the neighbouring countries (Turkey, Jordan, and Russia) that also take part in the conflict. The last one is the state level government, who holds the biggest role in the international relations. As previously explained, we can see that what appoint the intrastate government to organise the absolute authority is because the people cannot decide their movements on their own, otherwise there will be chaos because they are divided into groups and groups do not desire the same things. It goes the same way with