Madison 's Proposed Remedies For The Problem Of Factions

Superior Essays
• Madison was speaking of bodies of countrymen who make an effort to promote their plans or economic ideals at the price of other citizens or in ways that conflict with the public good. They are also known as special-interest groups. In many governments they have come to control all of the central power, which would be a bad thing as all power would be ruled by one faction that would control the country and not improbably become oppressive. The biggest challenge for the Framers was to organize a government where monopolization would not be conceivable. To produce a political system that would be powerful enough to sustain regulation but would not jeopardize freedom.

• Explain Madison’s proposed remedies for the problem of factions.
• One way to deal with these groups was to prevent whatever perpetuates them to emerge in the first place. This can be endeavored in two ways. First, government can strip people of their right to assemble: "Liberty is to faction what air is to fire." But that is surely a cure "worse than the disease. "Secondly, steps can be implemented to make all residents share the same beliefs, opinions, and fiscal dispositions. However, Madison believed some citizens are cleverer or more disciplined than others, and this "diversity in the faculties" of civilians is assured to sequel in various monetary strategies. Madison thus suggests a more feasible and advisable way of thwarting factions. The best way therefore, to cure "the mischiefs of faction" is not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Guard Against Tyranny Dbq

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document B it states that tyranny can stay in a democracy for however long the ruler can keep it there. The Legislative branch which is the congress is there to make the laws. The executive branch which is the president, is there to carry the laws out. The judicial branch which is the court's, interprets laws. Allowing a person to be elected to the house of representatives and at the same time on the supreme court, Madison did not like the idea because the laws wouldn't be equal.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    of C.’s lack of authority (which is necessary when running a government to some degree) James Madison expresses that just because one certain state does not side with the majority it has delayed the reformation of a more efficient government. (Doc. A) This shows how incapable the A. of C. was at the time unlike the constitution which only requires a ⅔ vote to pass an amendment.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 51 Summary

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison discusses that men are not perfect and that it may be assumed that as men we may act greedily and act in a way that benefits ourselves rather than society as a whole. “But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.”…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also suggested the idea of checks and balances. This is a great tool to use in America’s kind of government because it means no one section of government could become more powerful than the other, the government stays true to the equality values, and it avoids possible corruption. Madison also presented the Virginia Plan which recommended using three branches in our government, a legislative branch, an executive branch, and a judicial branch. This plan is now used as the basis of today’s…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, Madison expands upon it by providing a way to eliminate the drawbacks of negative factions. This is what birthed the 1st Amendment in order to protect everyone's rights.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States constitution was signed and approved by the constitutional convention delegates in 1787, and it needed ratification from nine states as it is required in article VII of the constitution before it could be enforced. States that decided not to ratify the constitution will be considered a different country, and not part of the union. With this knowledge, the urge of the ratification led to a conflict among the delegates that resulted in numerous documents, essays, pamphlets, and articles. The conflict; perhaps debate consists of two opposing sides; the Federalists who wanted the ratification of the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists objected to the ratification. The Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton were in favor of…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The people of the Early Republic of the 1790s had very distinct, opposing views of one another on how the government should operate under a new constitution. These disputes stemmed from the adoption of beliefs from Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, who originally were highly opposed to factions. Their ideas were vastly accepted by two different groups: the Hamiltonians and the Jeffersonians. The many issues they disagreed on were nearly opposite one another, and ultimately lead to the creation of the first party system consisting of the Federalists and Republicans. Initially, these two men were very much against factions.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Madison thinks that the Republic proposed in the Constitution is what America needs. There are enough congressional representatives that a few dissenters will not have a large impact on the government, but there are not so many representatives that the government fails to give the people what they want. The checks and balances put into place on the branches of this government help to ensure that the citizens have rights and a say in the government, but they do not have so much control over the government that it threatens the social order of the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Our founding fathers did an outstanding job when they shaped this nation. They made sure that no one person could have all the power to govern this country. The constitution was established under the system of Checks and Balances to disperse the powers into the three branches of government. However, James Madison discusses in the Federalist no. 51 that the legislative branch was intended to predominate over the three branches. Nevertheless, as the time has gone by, does the legislative branch still predominate, and why was it intended to rule over the remaining branches?…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America’s most important document, Patrick Henry and James Madison played two key roles in the development of the Constitution. These two men had different views on how America should be governed. Patrick Henry who was against the new Constitution and sided with the Anti-Federalists. James Madison was the architect of the Constitution and felt a powerful government was needed in order for the colonies to not fall apart. After the Revolutionary War the colonies needed some help with the low imports from Britain since they were cut off from the war and the debt was increasing.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his life James Madison did some major stuff he made a major contribution to the ratification of the constitution, he was the 4th president of the United States, he also helped write the federalist papers. As president James Madison passed some major stuff and also had some major things happen in his life. James Madison was born in 1751 , he was brought up in Orange County , Virginia he went to the College of New Jersey (now known as Princeton) as a student of history and government , well-read in law, Madison participated in the founding of the constitution of Virginia in 1776 . He was also was a leader in the Virginia Assembly and also was in the continental congress. He also took an emphatic and frequent part of the Constitutional Convention debates in philadelphia when he was 36.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was the first necessary step in proving that America was capable of managing freedom and democracy. They viewed America as an ever-expanding territory that could only survive given a balanced federal government. As the excerpt from James Madison’s public defense of the Constitution states, many foreign governments at the time refused to engage in treaties with America and did not hold the country in high respect because of the ongoing strife between the government and it’s people. Madison argued that ratifying the Constitution would eliminate much of the disunity between the states and would create trust between the general and individual government. He also emphasized the proposal of a three-fourths consensual agreement policy when ratifying new amendments.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    10 and No. 51 assume that it is in our human nature to be selfish. In Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison states that factions will always exist. The only way to prevent a faction from being too powerful is to have numerous factions competing with one another. Democracy and self­interest creates factions. Federalist Paper No. 10 gives specific ways to eliminate the negative effects that factions create.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays