Democracy In The Middle East Essay

Improved Essays
The United States is a very special country. Throughout the eighteenth century, the thirteen colonies were subject to the despotic rule of England’s monarch, George III. However, in less than three decades, revolution created a democratic state, and over the next two centuries, this democracy has become a global superpower known as the United States of America. Sadly, many Middle Eastern nations are under autocratic rule, and thus face severe human rights violations. Just as the Revolutionary Americans received assistance from the French to free themselves from the shackles of tyranny, there exists an obligation for the United States to promote democracy in the Middle East. Not only will it benefit Middle-Easterners, but there will be tremendous …show more content…
First, there is a myriad of public support in the region. Pew Research Center finds that in addition to Pakistan, “solid majorities in Lebanon, Turkey, Egypt, Tunisia and Jordan believe democracy is the best form of government.” As a result, there will be little barriers in promoting democracy, and therefore it will be of low cost to Americans. Additionally, America has been successful in the past. Specifically, Tunisia is a prime example of a democracy in the Middle East through American assistance. The Jasmine Revolution in 2010 toppled authoritarian rule, allowing for a democracy to be created. The United States was instrumental in stabilizing Tunisia and transforming the post-revolutionary area into a thriving democracy. USAID writes that they “answered Tunisian requests for support for economic growth, democratic governance, and expanded opportunities—areas that are interlinked in this transition environment.” America gave them hundreds of millions of dollars in economic and humanitarian aid, and it has clearly benefitted them. All-in-all, if America does what it did in Tunisia, with the people’s support, it is incomprehensible to believe that promoting democracy is costly or unfeasible. Ultimately, the United States of America has an obligation to promote democracy in the Middle East. The impacts of democracy promotion will benefit the people there, along with American citizens. This is because there will be a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He states that “poor agency and policy framing have wrongly rendered democracy promotion” (Legler 2012: 584). He goes on to say that there are challenges with national interests such as trade and security interests. His article briefly describes the arguments of other scholars. Levitt suggests that the issue is not economic or security reasons. Rather, he says, the issue involves democratic principles and human rights.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Most Americans believe that democracy is the best form of government and therefore, support policies that protect, value, and expand democracy. The overwhelming support for democracy stems from, Majority rule (the belief that government decisions should reflect the will of majority of the…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States’ past attempts have led to backlash as seen with the number of terrorist organizations that have popped up soon afterwards. The neo-imperialistic actions of the United States are not met with open hands as seen with amount of backlash that occurs when intervening. Since the detriments outweigh the benefits, the United States should not go into the Middle East and try to enforce democracy. The United States needs to stop trying to enforce their own beliefs all over the world in order for a more peaceful global…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I would argue that during the cold war and after, the US goals and strategy were and still are neocolonial, but the purposes for being neocolonial changed. In the cold war, the plan was to prevent any nuclear detonation from either side and win by attrition of sorts. Not of troop numbers but by having a country more dedicated to its way of life and capable of sustaining itself long term, this was evident when the Soviet Union bankrupted itself and collapsed. Neocolonialism makes a lot of sense. You get to control other people with minimal military involvement compared to keeping a standing military force typically needed in each controlled country.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Democratization is not typically associated with the Middle East and North Africa. There are a variety of factors that can explain why this is the case. There is a lack or presence of civil society, the state controls the economy, the people are disadvantaged, the location of the Middle East and North Africa is disadvantageous for democracy, and the culture of the region can impact the government (Bellin 2004, 139-141). In The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective Eva Bellin argues that these factors are not enough and instead “…a coercive state deeply opposed to democratic reform has quashed initiatives favorable to democracy” (Bellin 2004, 142). Bellin uses this to explain why the Middle…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Belarus Controversy

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Barrack Obama will fully support the spread of democracy to foreign countries. He has done so in the past by promoting foreign organizations who support and try to spread democracy. The U.S. is a member of NATO and the UN which have promoted civil society which includes being open to the idea of democracy. (Lagon) Vladimir Putin, the leader of Russia, both supports and opposes the spread of democracy.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Democracy favors smaller organizational entities, such as the state or the town hall meeting. It is very difficult to deliberate among 6 billion people, and one need only look at the UN to realize that the larger an area an organization encompasses, the less democratic it tends to be. With so many distinct cultures on this earth, it would be a shame to lump them all together and subject them to the will of the majority whose moral outlook they do not share. The continued existence of the celebrated diversity of this planet and the democratic ideals they hold dear depends largely on the existence of a plurality of…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As religions grow, many interpretations come up, particularly during a time of crisis. However, many contend that organizations that have a theology which is founded on hate do not represent any of the traditions in Islam. Many devotees of Islam argue that Islam is a religion of peace. The truth of this assertion may not be entirely accurate; this is because many militant groups carry out their activities through based on a puritanical strain of Islam that is known as Jihadi Salafism. It can be described as a medieval interpretation of Islam that developed when the Arabs were not in good terms with the Europeans as well as the East Asians.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political System

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Which political system is better for a country? Each country have different needs, cultures, history, strengths and weaknesses to take into account in order to find the appropriate system. The aftermath of war in Iraq, when talking about politics, was focused on asserting control over the country, the next step in order to rebuild the country is establishing a representational system, the majority believe that democracy is the system to follow, since a democracy is not a unknown concept for them, but the success of democracy depend on whether the United States take into consideration the unique social and communal population or the system was chosen because it have been prove to work for them. A confederation is an alliance of sovereign states united for common objectives, this system is supposed to unite the different colonies, states or factions.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    the transition of regimes. These regimes’ persistence is embedded in their cultural foundations and institutional structure (Yom and Gause, 2012). Elliot Abrams (2012) claims that the historical connection of the Arab monarchies give them their strength and legitimacy. He explains how the monarchy is often sustained by religious belief, and this gives them more legitimacy than any self-appointed strongmen (Abrams, 2012).…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before entering the course, I believed that democracy in the Middle East was a viable option but that, because of many cultural reasons, was not the best option for that region. Now, having taken this course and learned about the different aspects of Middle East governance, I do not think that democracy is a viable option at all. It is not the matter of democracy cannot succeed in the Middle East or anything like that, it is the matter of democracy not being properly suited for societies like those in the Middle East. The agenda of the United States to turn a lot of these nations into democracies has really gotten nowhere. I would say that they actually caused more problems in this region than actually solved during their quest for democratization.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States must continue to work with other democracies to promote democracy in the Middle East recognizing that quick change is a dream. The United States’ democracy promotion policy must be implemented consistently over the long term, which will last well beyond the end of President Bush’s second term on January 20, 2009. Our goals must be initially modest, and the commitment to change long term. The core elements of a democracy oriented policy are not hard to identify: sustained, high-level pressure on Arab states to respect political and civil rights and to create or widen genuine political space; clear, consistent pressure on Arab states to carry out pro-democratic institutional, legal, and constitutional changes; and increased…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, the United States has forces in or around much of the Middle East and the Gulf States. In some of these countries, the U.S. is fighting against an armed enemy and attempting to organize a government with the local population. When it comes to the case of the United Arab Emirates, we are supporting their fight in the armed conflicts in neighboring countries. Yet, there still remains a question as to why we are in their country supporting them. Why might America have an interest in what is going on in the United Arab Emirates?…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    THOMAS KUNEMOEMI IRPS200 ESSAY1 Introduction The values of democracy, society, respect for human rights, and equality have become recognized everywhere as universal values. To my own point of view, there 's assistant degree close association between democratic values and also the elementary values of human goodness. Wherever if there is democracy there 's a larger chance for the voters of the country to specify their basic human qualities, and wherever these basic human qualities prevail, there 's conjointly a larger scope for strengthening democracy. Most significantly, democracy is additionally the foremost effective basis for guaranteeing world peace.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Democracy Essay

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Not only do the people have zero power to interfere in the governing body, but they sometimes are persecuted due to their beliefs, race, language and religion. Therefore, democracy is the best policy to adapt to balance out the involvement of minorities and majorities in affairs other than…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Superior Essays