The Pros And Cons Of The Federal Government

Decent Essays
Under the United States of America’s presidential system and according to its Constitution, the federal government is split into three distinct branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The executive branch consists of the president, who is head of state and head of government and his cabinet. The president occupies office for a four-year term and is able to serve a maximum of two terms. During this period, he or she is in charge of U.S. foreign policy and is the commander-in-chief of the military. He or she also conducts daily governmental affairs, appoints executive and judicial branch members, and proposes and vetoes legislative bills. In order to properly manage a large bureaucracy, the President assigns cabinet members …show more content…
British prime ministers are given a great deal of power in comparison to other modern democracies, since the majority party in Parliament commonly passes all laws, party discipline is strong, and there are few checks on power. PMs are elected to a maximum five-year term but are able to call elections any time during that period, which would finish his or her term and end the current session of Parliament. When a significant bill is rejected by the legislature, a vote of no confidence may occur. Consequently, either the entire cabinet resigns and is replaced or new elections are called. This is another way the Prime Minister’s term and session of Parliament may come to a close. If neither a vote of no confidence occurs nor the PM calls a new election, the government simply waits until the term has expired for both the PM and Parliament to replace …show more content…
India’s constitution conveys the basic principles of the parliamentary democracy of Britain, who ruled the nation for centuries. However, Indian government is more like that of the U.S. in certain aspects, such as its federal system, which gives significant power to its state governments. The branches of Indian government consist of the president, the prime minister and cabinet, the legislature, and the judiciary. Due to India’s nature as a republic, the head of state not a monarch but a president, whose role is mostly symbolic. The primary powers of the executive branch are the prime minister and his or her cabinet. Not surprisingly, the Indian prime minister conducts many of the same duties as those of the British prime minister and attains his or her position by being the leader of the majority party in the lower house. As long as the majority party is in favor of the prime minister, there is no term limit imposed on his or her office. The PM chooses members of parliament to constitute a large Council of Ministers, of which a smaller group of 15 to 20 meet weekly as the cabinet to manage government

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Constitution: How does it guard against tyranny The constitution guards against tyranny because the constitution is less compact than tyranny. Federalism guards against tyranny because federalism has separate branches and governments. Many believed that the constitution wasn’t helping keep order. Under the articles of confederation there was no chief executive.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this system the prime minster is picked by the political party that has the majority power in parliament. Hudson believes this is a better system due to the fact that because both the prime minster and parliament are a part of the same political party they would try to pass the same agenda. This would make them more responsive because legislation can get passed in a timely manner and more accountable because votes would know exactly who to blame when things go wrong. I believe there is nothing wrong with the separation of powers system. It is working just like the framers wanted it to work.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Anti-federalist correctly pointed out that the Constitution granted the federal courts an abundance of power, at the expense of the state and local courts. They wanted equal representation and supported implementing the Bill of Rights into the constitution for guaranteed protection of individual and natural rights. So when deciding to support Federalism or Anti-Federalism I choose Anti-federalism. Not only do I concur with the inclusion of the Bill of Rights and its necessity but I would have also side with them on senators and presidents being directly elected by the people.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the Americans were creating their new government, they kept the features of the government they did not want in mind. They wanted to ensure that their government was very different from the monarchy that Britain had by trying to make a central government where its powers were not necessarily weak, but where the power rested in the people. Another feature that the Americans did not want in their new government was unequal representation. They despised the lack of representation they had in Parliament, and as they created their new government they ensured that every state was represented equally so the concerns of the people could be properly addressed. Because of this, the American public was adamant that the new government’s powers were…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas Constitution

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The “Texas constitution is one the of longest and oldest still in effect. The Alabama Constitution, although ratified 25 years after Texas' had been deemed the longest and most chaotic having been amended almost 800 times” (Ballotpedia, 2016). The Texas Constitution allows for some interesting differences in comparison to the United States Constitution. The one that will be focused on is the difference in the Executive Branch.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution did a better job of achieving the principles that the American Revolution fought for than the Articles of Confederation did. The United States Constitution applied and enforced all of the rights that were gained in the Revolutionary war and granted the United States with a democracy. The Government could be divided into three branches of power; the colonist could choose who they wanted to represent them in the House of Representatives, and through the Bill of Rights freedom was bestowed onto all free citizens. Under the United States Constitution the government is divided into three branches, The Executive branch, the Legislative branch, and the judicial branch.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Cabinet helps the president in day to day decisions by helping him weigh the pros and cons of different bills sent to him by congress as well as assisting him in foreign policy decisions. The Cabinet is essential to the president because it is filled with people who he trust which helps take the some of the pressure off him since he is running the biggest, most advanced and most powerful country in the…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitutional Convention was a very special event that shaped American history, it all started with one bright idea. After the Articles of Confederation, James Madison and others noticed that the central government created by the Articles of Confederation was weak and ineffective. So many famous political attended a convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The convention was held at the State House of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in May through September of 1787. They created a strong central government still used today!…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Role of Prime Minster of Canada and the President of the United States Many people think that President of the United States has more power than Prime Minster of Canada. However, when we look at the constitution of both countries, we can see that Prime Minister of Canada has more power in his or her country than President of United States does. When we want to compare and differentiate the power of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we need to look at their system of Government, roles of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States on legislative power, party discipline, appointive power, influence, and military power, and ability to implement their agenda. If we want to know more about the powers and role of Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we have to first look at their system of Government.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Legislative branch comes the Executive branch and is made up of the President and Vice President as well as their advisors and government agencies. In the second article of the Constitution, the Executive branch is assigned its own powers and roles in helping run the country’s government and people. Although the main function of the Executive branch is to execute the law, the Executive branch is divided into five different roles or “chiefs.” As Chief Executive, the president is in charge of making sure that all abide by the laws passed by Congress, send forth executive orders to the public, nominate judges and even those in the Supreme Court with the Senate’s consent, choose government officials depending on Senate approval, and acting…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The leader of the winning party then becomes the Prime Minister…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a major advantage to the Prime Minister as it essentially allows for them to appoint those who will be loyal and support their decisions throughout their time in office. Therefore it is argued that the “British government embodies a system not of formally codified rules but instead advice”2 and relates to the Prime Minister being surrounded by 'Yes ' men who simply agree and advise rather than argue and debate. As a result, this allows the Prime Minister to push their political agenda forward with little opposition as those in the cabinet are usually in favour or loyal to their decision. To embody this sense of power further, the Prime Minister can drop cabinet members who are not in favour of their decision from the cabinet entirely3 increasing their political standing by replacing them with someone more in favour. Theoretically, cabinet members can debate against points made by the Prime Minister, however this is very unlikely due to having a sense of loyalty after being appointed by them.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays