Preserving and strengthening the position of the United States when it makes treaties or sends ambassadors abroad is practicing foreign policy. The United States is an independent and sovereign country that requires the protection of that sovereignty as the priority duty of its foreign policy. The Constitution created the institutions to serve “the separate and equal station to which the Law of Nature and of Nature’s God entitles them” (Declaration of Independence of the U.S) as the central purpose which is more important than all other purposes. At the same time, as a sovereign country, all states in America have to satisfy all the standards in order not to hurt the legitimacy of claims to sovereignty. Given this fact, the responsibility of
…show more content…
Both of them have rights to launch and adjust foreign policy as well as interact with each other without end throughout the life of a policy. The U.S Political is well known as checks and balances system, so that the roles of both branches are equally important but often interweave to each other since making an effective foreign policy is an elaborate process. Even though the power of the President is not unlimited, he is the chief diplomat of the nation who has the dominant force in foreign policymaking while Congress has asserted its important role to show indirect but potential influence in making foreign …show more content…
Some of “sole executive agreements” are made by the President without submitting to the Senate or Congress for approval since he assumes he can accomplish them within his own powers and authority. For example, there are some agreements that are made by the President such as the Vietnamese Peace Agreement in 1973, the Yalta Agreement in 1945 or the Iranian Hostage Agreement in 1981 (Grimmet). Nevertheless, the President has to take into account Congress’s opinion because Congress participates in most of international agreement such as decide an acceptable agreement or tie some conditions to an approved agreements by placing in legislation instruction. For example, according to Grimmet, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and General Agreement on Trade Tariffs (GATT) Uruguay Round agreements in 1993 were under the “fast-track” process which had been developed by the Nixon and Force Administration. The purpose of this procedure is to give the President more confident to negotiate trade agreements with foreign countries and Congress would not undermine the President’s ability through traditional rules. Under this process, Congress has accredited negotiate power to the President but entailed its approval before the agreements employing. After the bill was introduced, Congress
Both of them have rights to launch and adjust foreign policy as well as interact with each other without end throughout the life of a policy. The U.S Political is well known as checks and balances system, so that the roles of both branches are equally important but often interweave to each other since making an effective foreign policy is an elaborate process. Even though the power of the President is not unlimited, he is the chief diplomat of the nation who has the dominant force in foreign policymaking while Congress has asserted its important role to show indirect but potential influence in making foreign …show more content…
Some of “sole executive agreements” are made by the President without submitting to the Senate or Congress for approval since he assumes he can accomplish them within his own powers and authority. For example, there are some agreements that are made by the President such as the Vietnamese Peace Agreement in 1973, the Yalta Agreement in 1945 or the Iranian Hostage Agreement in 1981 (Grimmet). Nevertheless, the President has to take into account Congress’s opinion because Congress participates in most of international agreement such as decide an acceptable agreement or tie some conditions to an approved agreements by placing in legislation instruction. For example, according to Grimmet, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and General Agreement on Trade Tariffs (GATT) Uruguay Round agreements in 1993 were under the “fast-track” process which had been developed by the Nixon and Force Administration. The purpose of this procedure is to give the President more confident to negotiate trade agreements with foreign countries and Congress would not undermine the President’s ability through traditional rules. Under this process, Congress has accredited negotiate power to the President but entailed its approval before the agreements employing. After the bill was introduced, Congress