The UDHR: An Argument Against The Universality Of Human Rights

Improved Essays
In 1948 UDHR was officially established but it did not guarantee human rights in each of everyone in the world. It took time to for it to be establish. The UDHR became official written rights that is supposed to protect each individual Human Rights, while there is human rights, it is different from actually enjoying this rights. Human Rights is important, and it 's often argued upon whether human rights are inalienable rights or human rights have limitations to it could extend to few. There are a lot argument placed about the universality of Human rights, either for its universality or inclusion which is against the idea of universality of human rights. Some arguments for human rights all humans regardless of race, class, and gender. There …show more content…
It argues that everyone has human rights. The right came from God and it was given to every human beings on the planet. According to Goodhart, “The rights described in the Declaration are moral ideas known as natural rights, derived from the natural law, which in Christian civilization had to do with the moral character given by God to his creation (29).” The idea derived from Christian 's view of human rights that are God given rights for everyone to enjoy. The rights are given for all humans to enjoy just because we are humans. Human are entitled to have human rights. It is only naturally given to humans and this natural rights would then become natural law. Following the argument of entitlement, Donnelly states that “If all human beings have human rights simply because they are human, then human rights are held equally by all(Donnelly 19).” All of humans regardless of class, gender, and race are equal as long as they are human. Additionally,“Being human cannot be renounced, lost, or forfeited. Therefore, human rights are also inalienable. Even the cruelest torturer and the most debased victim are still human beings (Donnelly 19).” A persons status is not enough to take away their rights. As we see, a victim and torturer have the same rights just because the are entitled to be a human. Human rights cannot be take away regardless of the status of a person long with the physical and social attribute …show more content…
Problems arise when powerful actors abuse Human Rights and that the abstract idea of human rights itself is problematic itself.
“Thomists do not even consider utilitarianism to be a moral theory. Thomists and most utilitarians... endorses human rights as a political conception of justice(Donnelly 39).” This means that human right have multiple foundations to be based on. Moreover, human rights as concept of politics means that it is a categorized of political, legal, and social theory. Human rights for them is not morally grounded. It means that human rights is not practiced universally but in difference perception of justice the way that a state practice it. A government is a powerful tool in implementing human rights. There are reasons why human rights are not practiced the same throughout the world. Culture is one of the most important aspect that influence the details of implementing human rights. Donnelly mentioned that. “Human rights are relatively universal at the level of the concept, the broad formulations characteristics of the Universal Declaration such claims in Article 3 and 22...(Donnelly 450.)” Article 3 states that” everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security to person. Article 22 states the rights to social security. Both articles shows that human rights is relative. The to right to liberty, security to person, and social security shows that

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Human Rights Are Universal

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A human right is a claim that demands respect; dominates; gives structure to systems; is objectively valid; instils duties; and gives humans power to certain freedoms. The term fundamental connotes to legal rights being necessary to form the core root of society. Universal accounts for all people, cultures, religions and countries, where there is an absence of ethnocentrism and discrimination. These three terms put together is showing that human rights dominate over other rights when they can be applied on any human being regardless of disabilities, status or wealth. These rights form the basis through which humans can lead a minimally good life only if applied.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Donnelly stated, “humans are entitled to equal concern and respect”. Humans are deemed equal and are guaranteed at the minimum the basic universal human rights.This is not only under Donnelly’s definition, but also under the International Bill of Human Rights. Therefore, I define current society as a democracy that allows it’s citizens to practice or have any basic human right without any…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For those countries who wanted to remain ‘traditional’ by this sense, they kept the idea to be bounded by their own hierarchy and even by the Caste System. Thus, what exactly are human rights and when can we exactly say that I have these rights as a human? Would you consider human rights to be jus cogens in nature? These are indeed empirical matters to be discussed. According to the United Nations Human Rights, human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, whatever our nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, language, or any other status.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that human rights are universal rights. Human rights are universal because we are all the same as humans. When it comes to human rights we should be treated equally all around the world. There are some countries and regimes in the world that do not care for others and for their rights as a person. When this happens there needs to be people that come together to stop them.…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Moral Rights?

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. Three (3) features of moral rights are that moral rights are natural; they are discovered not created. They are equal; no injustice in how they are shared. Moral rights cannot be taken away from an individual without consent and they are the same; they are universal no matter where a person is moral rights are the same. 3.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    These laws, therefore, he would argue, are objective and universal. Now, these natural laws are arrived at using our human reason. They encompass natural rights and duties. Each man,-- again, the gendered language-- has the rights to life, liberty, and property and the duty to not violate the rights of others. These natural rights come from a recognition of the equality of each other,-- well, at least the equality of men-- stemming from a belief that we should respect others as we also want to be…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the people should not claim rights which they have not allowed the government to regulate because they already belong to the people. Opponents to this argument will say that the powers given in the constitution are too ambiguous and could be poorly construed. They also questioned the harm in having a bill of rights, and believe there is already a truncated bill of rights in the constitution in the protections of individual…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anti-Federalists fought for a Bill of Rights to be included within the Constitutional framework governing the federal government so as to explicitly codify individual rights under the law. Their skepticism regarding the nature of government recognized state action and the liberties of the individual citizen are typically antithetical in nature and in need of explicit protection. Some Federalists on the other hand were actually fearful of such methods, worrying that explicitly listing the rights of the individual was an inherently limiting approach to liberty – with the idea that those which were not listed were not fundamentally retained by the people. James Madison stated, “[T]he government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general.” James Madison original position prior to Constitutional ratification and the inclusion of the Bill of Rights was that the Constitution inherently restricted the powers of the national government to those that were clearly defined.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They create a hierarchy of rights which eliminate the idea of equality between all rights. This creates a conflicts of rights where only few rights (Or in reality, only one…) can be considered incontrovertible. Authors have their own set of rights which they consider to be incontrovertible: Hobbes (security); Kant (freedom); Arendt (citizenship) and Locke (life, liberty & property). According to them, the rights mentioned in parentheses are superior to other rights and must be respected within conflicts. This may cause societal division as individuals have a multitude of perspectives as to what rights we should hold important in society.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The result of this could often be results that are not accurate and potentially tampered with. To claim to be an international governing body but have no way of independently conducting and under going research and fact finding missions is unacceptable and takes power away from its ability to be taken as a functioning body. The Human Rights Commission’s reports are used by the Committee however these reports are described as “ inadequate”…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays