Truth In The Truth: The Correspondence Theory Of Truth

Great Essays
The Correspondence Theory of Truth can be traced back to early Greek philosophers. Aristotle defined Truth as: “To say of what is that it is not, or of what is not that it is, is false, while to say of what is that it is, and of what is not that it is not, is true.” While the theory has undergone countless revisions, it still maintains that the determining factor in Truth is whether or not a premise accurately describes reality. For example, we may say Heliocentrism is true and that we can say so because said model is an accurate depiction of “what is.” This is why there is placed so much confidence in this theory and why it seems the most intuitive to people. It would seem that someone who pursued something that did not seek to align with accurately portraying reality then they would be engaged with something different than truth or -- at least -- a truth of a different kind. …show more content…
When, for instance, astronomers are making claims on what they are observing, they are subject to logical critique as well as one’s concerning the observations themselves. Any presupposition, unforeseen consequence, or logical failure is equally a barrier to truth as failures or limitations of observation. (Markus, 809) Biasing any understanding on a bundle of ideas, which correspond to “what is” would lack nuance in use. To say -- If A then (A or B) is not the same as If (A and B) then A – would be difficult to come by with correspondence theory of truth. In order to justify a proposition within a correspondence theory of truth, there is a simple relationship between a proposition and what it is to correspond with to make it true. Correspondence theories restricted their practitioners to a very limited scope that they must work under. Truth cannot often be found in a universe that only contains a proposition and its corresponding truth marker. (Markus

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In William James', “The Will to Believe, James provides a defensive response to religious faith regarding W. T. Clifford's position in his essay, "The Ethics of Belief" (James, 2001). Within his stance, James suggests that his views have a somewhat broader scope that Clifford’s (Princeton University, n.d.). Moreover, that in certain cases, it is not only permissible but inevitable that a person’s passional, non-rational nature will determine that person’s belief (Princeton University, n.d.). In summary, James presents that anything that is proposed for our belief is a hypothesis and that any question about which of the two hypotheses to accept is a person’s option (Princeton University, n.d.).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sense Certainty Analysis

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What does sense-certainty fail in achieving, and what does this failure mean for epistemology? 2000. December 9th. Sense-certainty is Hegel 's approach to proving that knowledge of the world is not a wholly passive process, he does this through a dialectic from, meaning that the argument moves as a conversation, with hegel presenting an answer to a question, in this case how one can know about the world through consciousness, and then works to show how the answer is wrong in itself, because it holds inconsistencies. This essay will be read as in two parts, first i shall discuss how sense-certainty fails, and then will approach the question of what that means for epistemology.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The current thesis endeavors to access the notion of “ Nothing is true, everything is permitted.” What is truth? What is so intricately responsible and substantial as to justify the real in depths of truth? Is truth ‘true’? What is ‘true’ then?…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As society discusses American Literature, the beginning of it all begins with the world’s native ancestors. World history has developed from over hundreds of years. Thanks to Native Americans, history began with them as they developed these lands culturally. Numerous stories with Native Americans have contributed to the development of the early years. While other important historian figures contributed to societal history with their written perspectives, a famous early explorer seemed to cause a little confusion in history when writing his side of the story.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truth and Reality are influenced by a person 's perceptions of the world. This is clear in Atonement as Robbie is accused of a heinous crime and both he and Cecilia suffer because Briony naïvely presumes she understands the complexities of adult relationships, and in an effort to protect her sister, she accuses Robbie of rape. A character is only able to perceive as much as he or she understands about the world, as his or her worldview is clouded by weakness and flaws.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discussion Questions: Why is the question “Is truth relative or absolute” important to the plot and characters? Hester is ostracized from society because people view her adultery as a great sin. However, Hester is able to change her view to understand that she is a strong woman who has done something other women wouldn’t dare to do.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I don’t think that there is any one theory that capture’s the truth. I believe that the truth is different for everyone. It brings to mind the story of the family of four who took a vacation together. Each one was asked to write about the vacation. None of the stories sound the same, some might have believed that they really did not go together, but the reality of it was that each person had the same experience and perceived it differently.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truth is in the Ear of the Beholder Understanding and making sense of the diverse inner psych that resides in each of us, is a daunting task. One thing is for certain, as long as humans have been able to communicate; they have had the ability to create stories and rumors. The deeper question is why? Why do people start rumors to begin with and then exactly who is spreading them? Gregory Rodriguez, a columnist with the Los Angeles Times examines these questions in his article written in 2009, called Truth is in the Ear of the Beholder (220).…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Gospel Truth Analysis

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order to uncover unknown information from an ancient civilization, archeologists usually do extensive digging and research in a specified area; however, to uncover truths about Jesus Christ, there was no removal of dirt, as the world 's most sold book was dug into. Although Christianity continues to be the most popular religion, scholars came together in a Seminar, seeking to find the provable truth, which leads to unpopular conclusions. Throughout the article entitled, The Gospel Truth? by David Van Biema, the question of Jesus and the two lenses through which we see him, faith and history, are explored, conclusions are made, and reactions are instant. Instead of believing by faith and tradition, the Jesus Seminar is an attempt to identify…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The matter of truth and perception are two concepts in which the definition changes depending on the individual. In the book The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, the author Stephen R. Covey speaks of an experience at the Harvard business School where and instructor demonstrated how two people can have a different outlook, yet both be right. Two variations of the same picture were given to two sides of the classroom and asked what was seen, both sides had different answers. The students argued and neither side could come to an agreement that both arguments were correct; except for a few students who tried to see the alternate perspective.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example, we know that a stone wall is very dense and hard. We also know that atoms are mostly empty space. That wall is made up of atoms, so is it not an empty space? As human beings, we search for logic and for coherence. Well, the fact that our concepts shape our conclusions through actions agrees together.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory has had a long history with philosophers of the past such as Plato, Aristotle, and Thomas Aquinas, but in modern philosophy the view of Bertrand Russell, who is a modern philosopher, is upheld. “Undoubtedly the most popular theory of truth is the correspondence theory , which says that truth is an agreement or correspondence between a proposition and some fact in the real world”(Velasquez 403). As a student of philosophy, I would like to analyze The correspondence theory of truth by comparing it The pragmatists theory of truth and The coherence theory of truth, I would like to analyze the facts and the real world, which are part of the theory, and provide some objections to the theory. In the search for truth, philosophers have come up with many theories regarding truth and justification.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the past centuries, the topics of realism and anti-realism have been on ongoing debate amongst philosophers. Both perspectives have been revisited time after time, citing different reasons for the existence of each belief. These two topics belong to the area of philosophy, more specifically, metaphysics. Metaphysics explores the nature of existence, exploring why things exist and how they came to exist in the first place. Philosophers argue that it is the foundation behind philosophy, answering questions about the existence of the world, that if left unanswered would hinder our perception and grasp of reality.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Coherentism

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is coherentism about justification plausible? When it comes to the acquisition of a true belief leading to knowledge, it is thought that these beliefs should be justified. Coherentism is a form of internal, non-linear justification which holds the idea that for a belief to be justified in any way it must cohere with a current system of beliefs. BonJour wrote that 'what justifies beliefs is the way they fit together' , in essence, for beliefs to be justified they must metaphorically form a lattice like structure, where they each support each other, creating a non-linear structure of justification. Coherentism is mostly considered as an internal form of justification as this process of reflection on our current beliefs to accommodate new ones is an internal, mental process, as opposed to those external theories of justification such as foundationalism which rely on empirical and perceptual data forming core beliefs together being the source of justification.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics