Bentham explains, “ ...with respect to each individual, in regard to whom the tendency of it is good upon the whole...Take the balance; which, if on the side of pleasure, will give the general tendency of the act, with respect to the total number or community of individuals concerned.” The purpose of this objectivist view is to bring about the best possible outcome or consequence for all that are concerned. This view does not worry about how the outcome or consequence was brought about. Bentham explains what is known as his fundamental axiom, “it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong.” According to Bentham, a utilitarian would obviously save as many lives as possible, which means saving the five people over the one person. For a utilitarian, this is the right decision morally. It does not matter how those lives were saved. Utilitarianism values the actions outcome rather than the action itself because it aims to gain the greatest happiness or
Bentham explains, “ ...with respect to each individual, in regard to whom the tendency of it is good upon the whole...Take the balance; which, if on the side of pleasure, will give the general tendency of the act, with respect to the total number or community of individuals concerned.” The purpose of this objectivist view is to bring about the best possible outcome or consequence for all that are concerned. This view does not worry about how the outcome or consequence was brought about. Bentham explains what is known as his fundamental axiom, “it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong.” According to Bentham, a utilitarian would obviously save as many lives as possible, which means saving the five people over the one person. For a utilitarian, this is the right decision morally. It does not matter how those lives were saved. Utilitarianism values the actions outcome rather than the action itself because it aims to gain the greatest happiness or