Utilitarianism: The Trolley Problem, By Immanuel Kant

Improved Essays
The trolley problem is a very important concept that philosophers explore. The trolley problem describes a situation that involves a trolley approaching five people that have been tied down to a track by some villain. As it happens you are standing right next to the switch that can divert the trolley onto another track. Sadly you do not have enough time to free them and save them. Unfortunately, the second track has one person tied down to it. What should you do? Save the five people and let the other person die or save the other person and let the other five die? Or not do anything at all? Jeremy Bentham an English philosopher and the founder of utilitarianism, would suggest that you should divert the trolley and save the five people, thus killing the other person. While Immanuel Kant a German deontological philosopher, would suggest to not …show more content…
Bentham explains, “ ...with respect to each individual, in regard to whom the tendency of it is good upon the whole...Take the balance; which, if on the side of pleasure, will give the general tendency of the act, with respect to the total number or community of individuals concerned.” The purpose of this objectivist view is to bring about the best possible outcome or consequence for all that are concerned. This view does not worry about how the outcome or consequence was brought about. Bentham explains what is known as his fundamental axiom, “it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong.” According to Bentham, a utilitarian would obviously save as many lives as possible, which means saving the five people over the one person. For a utilitarian, this is the right decision morally. It does not matter how those lives were saved. Utilitarianism values the actions outcome rather than the action itself because it aims to gain the greatest happiness or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism decides if an action is moral or immoral by the number of people affected and their happiness. Utilitarianism ultimately wants to be the greatest outcome for the greatest number of people. So the question here is, Do Said’s actions result in happiness for a large amount of people? Bentham also talks about Value Hedonism. Value Hedonism refers to pleasure versus pain.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This makes me think of a parent trying to help their kid study. I know whenever my dad would try to help me with homework it would just confuse me further and cause me to be upset. While my dad was tutoring me believing that it was good will, it didn’t have a good outcome. The utilitarian approach also applies to the Trolley problem. Choosing to let one man die over five because you think it’ll cause a happier outcome is technically moral according to Mill.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A utilitarian, after calculating the pleasure (i.e. utility) each possible scenario produces or diminishes, would believe that you should kill an occupant as one death results in less disutility than six…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles. First is Divine Command Theory (DCT). For Consistency, DCT is consistent because God either commands an act to be either right, wrong, or it is permissible if God has not claimed if it is right or wrong.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is interesting because it takes primarily a consequentialist approach to ethic looking at the ends to something and looks at the pros or cons of an action, or what causes the most happiness versus the amount of generating pain from an action. Even though it sounds simple to compare the amount of happiness versus pain the equation that we have to use for utilitarianism does not always work the that it should and other flaws that we will go over in this essay taking an unusual stance on the matter, questioning the utility monster but also criticizes utilitarianism later but also saying that it is the best that we have currently have. The idea of a utility monster is not a valid objection against utilitarianism and can be worked…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In many different situations, an action must be decided on. Mill and Kant each present two major theories as to how this decision is reached and how it can be judged as morally right or wrong. In the given predicament of Rescue I and Rescue II, each philosopher would argue for a different ethical approach based on the fundamental principles of their individual theories components of their theories. John Stuart Mills is famous for his views on utilitarianism. His view is revised from his teacher Jeremy Bentham’s theory of crude utilitarianism which introduces the Greatest Happiness Principle().…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jai’lece McCracken Medical Law & Ethics Term Paper Should Sally be Sterilized Sally Smith is 26 years old and is disabled. Her aunt has gone to court to have the young woman sterilized. Smith opposes the sterilization, but a judge has decided that since Sally “would suffer irreparable psychological damage” if she had a child, she should be sterilized. Should Sally be allowed to have children?…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the branch of normative ethics, a person discerns what is right or wrong behavior. There are several theories about what is right or wrong conduct, but two of the most popular ideas is Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Both set up strict methods of deciding how a person would know what the right thing to do in a situation would be. On one hand, utilitarianism claims that you can use intuition to discern what the greatest good for the greatest number of people is. On the other side, Kantianism claims that you can use reasoning and logic to discern moral obligations and rules.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first Dilemma is The Runaway Trolley. In short, The Runaway Trolley deals with a complex situation where Molly needs to push a stranger onto the tracks to prevent the trolley from killing five workmen. If she does not push the stranger the five workers will die. According to the Utilitarianism, a philosophical school of thought, Molly should push the stranger onto the tracks to save the five workers. Utilitarianism would argue that five lives is greater than one.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of Utilitarianism is very vulnerable to criticism due to its reliance on vague underlying principles that leave many questions unanswered. The Utilitarianism ideology is grounded in three simple propositions. First off, actions are solely deemed right if they result in the best consequences. Secondly, the only way consequences are assessed are by how much happiness and unhappiness they cause.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an “act as to maximize or further pleasure for everyone.” Jeremy Bentham, a philosopher and creator of the Hedonic Calculus argues that there are only two masters when it comes to maximizing happiness, pleasure v.s. pain. However, according to his calculus whoever is receiving more pleasure than pain, by all means should continue the act, even if it is immoral. For example, if a sadist is torturing an innocent person and is receiving more pleasure than the innocent person is receiving pain then, according to Bentham it is okay for the sadist to continue because that would mean maximum happiness has been achieved. And the sole goal of Utilitarianism is to maximize pleasure for everyone.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays