Regret regulation theory focuses on the existence of regret in a form of anticipation, in where information in regards to other choices that are available and that the decision maker would have a reason to make something that can be important as unimportant. This would minimize the anticipated regret. On the other hand there’s the benefit of counterfactual thinking, which means going against known facts that become the motivation in which the attempt reduces the regretted experienced. This can have a direct and indirect emotion to the …show more content…
Will the person still feel empathy towards that person? For example, when a black male commits a crime and the juror are white, there will be racial bias in mock juror Decision- making. According to a report by Human Rights Watch (2000), Black male drug users are 13 times more likely than White male drug users to be sentenced to jail, even though the estimated drug usage rates are equivalent for the two groups. This report basically describes that even though white male and black male commit the same crime is more likely that the black male be sentenced to jail because of his race. Even though there is empirical research were it shows that black male are harshly punish more than white when it comes to murder cases, there is other research that put in confusion on the issue of race as related to mock juror decision making (Poulson,