Counterfactual Thinking Essay

Improved Essays
Michelle, 26, and Jorge, 29 having been dating approximately 4 almost 5 years. She is from Ecuador and he is from Peru. They both felt in love when they meet for the first time at the University they both attend in Miami, Florida. As their fifth anniversary, approximate they have plans to celebrate it in a different way so for that they have planned to take a trip to Cancun, Mexico. But, in order to get the preparation started they are debating whether to take an airplane or to simply make it a road trip. After long conversations and thoughts, they both have decided that in order to save money for the trip they will make it a road trip instead of paying for two airlines ticket which can be more expensive for them. As they both count down the …show more content…
Regret regulation theory focuses on the existence of regret in a form of anticipation, in where information in regards to other choices that are available and that the decision maker would have a reason to make something that can be important as unimportant. This would minimize the anticipated regret. On the other hand there’s the benefit of counterfactual thinking, which means going against known facts that become the motivation in which the attempt reduces the regretted experienced. This can have a direct and indirect emotion to the …show more content…
Will the person still feel empathy towards that person? For example, when a black male commits a crime and the juror are white, there will be racial bias in mock juror Decision- making. According to a report by Human Rights Watch (2000), Black male drug users are 13 times more likely than White male drug users to be sentenced to jail, even though the estimated drug usage rates are equivalent for the two groups. This report basically describes that even though white male and black male commit the same crime is more likely that the black male be sentenced to jail because of his race. Even though there is empirical research were it shows that black male are harshly punish more than white when it comes to murder cases, there is other research that put in confusion on the issue of race as related to mock juror decision making (Poulson,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Randy Furst’s article “Black defendants, white jurors: Does race make a difference in the court?” is about racism and reveals that an all white jury is more likely to demonstrate racial prejudices against a defendant of color as demonstrated by his use of evidence. Specifically, Furst’s use of evidence suggests that on a mixed jury, jurors will acquit a non-white defendant more times than an only white jury. The first insight into the racism that non-white defendants have to face occurs when Larry Leventhal, Twin Cities defense attorney, says “‘I think it would be a challenge to get a jury that considers all the factors when the jury is white,’”(1). Leventhal’s reference to juries considering factors while white demonstrates that if a jury…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Manuel is an African American Judge grew up without any awareness of racism until he was charged with disorderly conduct for a simple parking incident. After that moment he has been subject to racial profiling and discrimination on multiple occasions. Manuel continues by mentioning how his white colleagues are surprised and try to rationalize any answer except racial bias. He then suggests that, “white judges are insensitive to racial issues in their courtrooms” because they themselves are used to unknowingly being preferred and consequently unable to recognize, “when subtle racial attitudes pervade their courtroom” (Manuel). Fortunately, there have been many trail-blazers for getting rid of bias in the courtroom.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System is written by Paul Butler and in his essay he writes about four major topics describing the racial influence in jury decisions. He also writes about the ways in which we can prevent theses racial based jury decisions. In my essay, I will be summarizing Butler’s article and analysing the way he approaches the criminal cases against African-Americans. Furthermore, I will describe my opinion of the way he supports him claim, speak about his arguments and compose a counter argument that can be used to critique his main argument. Paul Butler is an African-American man and former federal prosecutor.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regret is feeling sad or disappointed in something that has happened in the past. It can be a negative feeling about actions that have been made and blaming one’s self on something that was done previously. It is thinking about past events and things one’s self did that they wish have been different or changed for the better or even the worse. It is important to know that taking actions to prevent regret in the future will one’s self in the long run. Brother and Doodle were going out to Horsehead Landing after dinner to go practice swimming to prepare for school.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Eyewitness Testimonies

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Multiple factors influence the decision to imprison an individual. These include but are not limited to faulty eyewitness, stereotypes, gender, and racial bias. What was found was that people often tend to categorize other individuals from different races in categories and also align the stereotypes for that race to that individual. In this case, white people or white eyewitnesses would group the black defendants in category that is considered criminal which influences their judgment in selecting the offender. Eyewitnesses are not the only ones who do that but people in the court like the judge or juries tend to do the same thing.…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the other significant issues facing the African-American, and our community as a whole, and is brought up in the New Jim Crow is: the myth of color-blindness of our Criminal Justice system. Michelle Alexander reiterates, that despite the popular belief, our Criminal Justice system is not color-blind after all. She proves this argument by illustrating case after cases where our criminal justice system has treated exactly the same scenarios differently. The only noticeable difference in such similar situations has been the color and race of the defendants.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All people are equal and if race is causing issues in the courtroom then there is a serious issue in our justice…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The most obvious form of prejudice is racial prejudice, however, on a wider scale certain jurors showed their prejudice in the form of preconceived notions and irrational ideas. Gilovich asserts that the tendency is “for people’s preconceptions to bias their interpretations of what they see”. (1993.p15) Although the ethnic background of the defendant is never revealed, the reader is led to believe he is from a minority background. Juror ten is the most obvious example of someone who is racially prejudiced; he is immediately against the defendant because he is “one of them” and makes frequent references to “those people” he subsequently argues with juror five, also an inhabitant of the slums in an attempt to defend his statement that the boys slum background proves that he is “trash”.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divergent Argument Essay

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When ideas are created, they are just thoughts; yet no one ever knows just how extreme those thoughts can become. In the book Divergent, written by Veronica Roth, there are many ideas that cross the line of good and bad. A good idea has become extreme when the outcome has a negative influence on people or a civilization. Paragraph 1: The main idea that went to the extreme and created a rubber band effect is the idea of having factions. There are five factions; Abnegation, Amity, Candor, Erudite, and Dauntless.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The George Washington Law Review article “Race, Prediction, and Discretion” states that “Some scholars claim that prediction is partially to blame for racial bias in criminal justice.” Police officers and judges shouldn’t just predict whether the defendant is a criminal or is going to do a crime again, it needs some deep thinking and going through evidence. Otherwise, people of all kind of races and ethnicities will encounter discrimination through every step of the way like: Stops, arrests, parole, incarceration,…

    • 1268 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prejudice is a hostile or negative attitude toward people in a separate group, due to their membership in that group (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2013). It has been with humanity since a long time ago, but it is only recently, within the 20th and 21st centuries that prejudice has surfaced more than ever, especially regarding the stereotypes of gender, to serve the rights of humans. Even recently, there have been news that were published in regards to prejudice and discrimination. The first news article concerns the shooting of 12-year-old Tamir Rice, in the United States, by another police officer because Rice ‘failed to obey an order to raise his hands’ after being caught pulling out a replica gun, which lacked of an orange safety indicator,…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important fact was the defendant’s ethnicity and low socioeconomic class. Most of the jurors were mostly middle-aged, white males from the middle-class status. These descriptions were different from the defendants, which made it difficult for the jurors to be sympathetic to the defendant. Juror #5, however, had experience living in a slum area, and so he could sympathize a little for the young man, and after several votes, he voted “not guilty” for the defendant. This example exhibits that if the juror are similar, the juror would tend to sympathize with the…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Hanging Judge Analysis

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosopher, Jiddu Krishnamurti once said, “The ability to observe without evaluating is the highest form of intelligence.” (Vajda, 2009). However, every person on this planet is guilty of passing judgement on other individuals. Whether the evaluation be made in a local grocery store or in as contentious an environment as a United States courtroom, humans are all guilty of judging individuals by their perceived covers. In an ideal world, legal punishments would reflect officials’ objectivity toward permissible evidence, however, empirical research has revealed additional arbitrary factors.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fraudulent actions are allowed by judges in courtrooms all the time. Often African Americans are discriminated against in the courtroom, which is a fact proven by the proportion of the African American serving time in the criminal justice system. This occurs because of “implicit bias,” which can be, and was measured by the Implicit Association Test (Rachinsky). Rachinksy’s research into the Implicit Association Test (IAT) shows that white people, more than any other race associate white people with positive thoughts and other races with the opposite. What race are most judges?…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays