On the other side of this argument, others, believe President Bush’s policies, including the use of torture or “enhanced interrogation”, indefinite detention without charge, warrantless wiretapping within the United States, and the claim that neither constitutional protections nor other provisions of domestic and international law constrains their treatment of suspected terrorists, as the new war on terror demands a president to use all of his vested constitutional powers, when dealing with this new combatant. They expect the president to use the power deemed necessary and to create avenues of safety such as secret prisons globally and enhanced interrogation procedures, as well as denying combatants habeas corpus, as if they were entitled to America’s
On the other side of this argument, others, believe President Bush’s policies, including the use of torture or “enhanced interrogation”, indefinite detention without charge, warrantless wiretapping within the United States, and the claim that neither constitutional protections nor other provisions of domestic and international law constrains their treatment of suspected terrorists, as the new war on terror demands a president to use all of his vested constitutional powers, when dealing with this new combatant. They expect the president to use the power deemed necessary and to create avenues of safety such as secret prisons globally and enhanced interrogation procedures, as well as denying combatants habeas corpus, as if they were entitled to America’s