The Tragic Trail Of Tears

Improved Essays
John Ross became principal chief of the Cherokee Nation in 1827, following the establishment of a government modeled on that of the United States. He presided over the nation during the apex of its development in the Southeast, the tragic Trail of Tears, and the subsequent rebuilding of the nation in Indian Territory, in present-day Oklahoma.
Ross was born on October 3, 1790, in Turkey Town, on the Coosa River near present-day Center, Alabama. His family moved to the base of Lookout Mountain, an area that became Rossville, Georgia. At his father's store Ross learned the customs of traditional Cherokees, although at home his mixed-blood family practiced European traditions and spoke English.
After attending South West Point Academy in Tennessee,
…show more content…
As Ross took the reins of the Cherokee government in 1827, white Georgians increased their lobbying efforts to remove the Cherokees from the Southeast. The discovery of gold on Cherokee land fueled their desire to possess the area, which was dotted with lucrative businesses and prosperous plantations like Ross's. The Indian Removal Bill passed by Congress in 1830 provided legal authority to begin the removal process. Ross's fight against the 1832 Georgia lottery, designed to give away Cherokee lands, was the first of many political …show more content…
Beginning in 1838, however, he was forced to lead the Cherokees through the tragic removal period, which culminated in the Trail of Tears. He remained principal chief until his death in 1866.] John Ross in the republican form of government, the authority of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the political power of Cherokee supporters, especially the Whig Party, gave him confidence that Cherokee rights would be protected. When the fraudulent Treaty of New Echota was authorized by one vote in the U.S. Senate in 1836, Ross continued to believe that Americans would not oust the most "civilized" native people in the Southeast. He fought removal until 1838, when it was clear there was no alternative; he then successfully negotiated with the U.S. government to handle the business of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jackson accepted the help of friendly native Americans and the Cherokee Regiment which included John Ross, “…and from the moment he enrolled, his destiny and Jackson’s were linked”, (Inskeep, 5). Jackson and Ross’s relationship evolved with many disagreements of their actions. Especially when Andrew Jackson and John Ross would start as friends and partners during the beginning of their alliance but Andrew ended up betraying Ross in the end due to his presidency power and his desperation to grow and expand the United Sates. Ross disagreed with Jackson throughout the years of the removal debate, the Trail of Tears trek from the Cherokee Homelands, and the rebuilding of the nation. Andrew Jackson left a big imprint upon America, he is best known for being the author of the Indian Removal act of 1830.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This sought to negotiate the exchange of Indian lands in the south for new lands in American territory (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). The Jackson Administration urged many Native Americans to sell their land and move out of the southern territory which a ajority did; however, the Cherokee Indians refused to move and went to the Supreme Court (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 253). The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the Cherokee Indians be allowed to remain on their land, but Jackson decided to force them out of the southern territory, along a Trail of Tears, that ended in Oklahoma (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). Many people criticized Jackson for these actions, calling them inhumane and cruel, but Andrew Jackson’s focus was for the interest and welfare of the people of United States. Even…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to further aggress the land seizures against the Cherokee, June 1st 1830, the Georgian government extended its lawful jurisdiction into Cherokee owned territory (58). This held Natives to Georgian law without the right of due process in court. Up until the election of Andrew Jackson, the state of Georgia and the Cherokee had a tug-of-war like battle over land rights. After Jackson’s election win, the federal government would begin to slowly take the side of the Georgians.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson listened to them and created the Indian Removal Act. He presented it to congress and they debated it. Eventually they approved of it and Jackson enforced it. Jackson thought this would be the best way to preserve their cultures and keep peace among the Americans and the Indians. In 1832 he was reelected.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson had always believed that white men were superior than those of other races. What was not favorable to Jackson was that Native Americans in the South had gotten stronger and emerged to be potential threats to whites. In addition, gold was discovered in Georgia in 1829, setting of a gold rush in territory inhabited by the Cherokee. The event put pressure on Jackson to somehow get Cherokees out of the land. As Native American tribes started to interfere with white society’s interest, Jackson induced the Congress to pass the Indian Removal Act in which empowered him to lay off new Indian homelands west of the Mississippi.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State of Georgia, which stated that the state of Georgia did not have jurisdiction in the Indian territory. Jackson’s support of national law was not present with this ruling, he did not see the ruling as valid and stated “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it (Foner, 386).” This resistance was seen when Jackson removed federal troops from protecting the Indians when miners illegally crossed the Cherokee Border. Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act, which would force the Indians to move to the west. When the Indians ignored the removal, United States troops moved in on the Cherokee to enforce the law.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most everyone has heard or learned about the Indian removal act and probably wondered how that was made and why it wasn 't vetoed or ruled unconstitutional. The Indian removal act was a law that was passed that allowed the president to make treaties with the native americans and try to offer them money and land somewhere else for there land. Andrew jackson got a lot of the tribes to sign the treaties but the ones that did not were pushed out by force anyway. This led to the Trail of tears which was when Andrew Jackson pushed out all of the Cherokee Nation with force and caused over 4000 native americans to lose their lives. The checks and balances system did not work as planned during this time the government was controlled by one party and…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He commented "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation” (Library of Congress, Jackson, 1830). At that time however only two tribes agreed to leave their land, the others were not in agreement with the Indian Removal Act. In response, the American Indians fought back on a political level, Chief John Ross who represented the majority of the American Indians who did not want to leave their lands tried to diplomatically and legally maintain autonomy with the United States…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief John Ross had a valid and undeniably strong argument against the 1835 Treaty of New Echota. He argues that treaty “is a fraud upon the government of the United States and an act of oppression on the Cherokee people” (John Ross’s Letter). He states that the Cherokee people, which was over 15,000 people, would never had agreed to the treaty and the treaty was made wrongfully. He argues that there should be another meeting and the Cherokee people should be equally consulted. John Ross uses a valid piece of evidence to support his argument.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But this was ignored and whites continued to move into Indian Territory. It is reported that U.S president Andrew Jackson responded by saying “Well John Marshall his decision. Now let him enforce it!” Andrew Jackson did nothing to help the Indians or make things better for them. He believed the best thing for them was to move them…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 1814 and 1824, president Jackson negotiated treaties that divested southern tribes in exchange of land in the west; whereas the tribes agreed to some of the treaties, they did so strategically with the aim of appeasing the federal government, protect themselves from white harassment…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Andrew Jackson no doubt planned the removal of Indians for the benefit of the US. However, when he misled the Indians into thinking he did it for their sakes, he went against his own promises of peaceful relations and respect for the Native Americans. Jackson refused to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision in the Worcester vs Georgia case where the Cherokees’ sovereignty was established, and continued to badger them into moving without acknowledging their rights. In dealing with the Indians, Jackson neglected the Treaty of Tellico, a treaty established in 1805 that set clear boundaries between the US and Cherokees, and pushed them out of their own lands. Therefore, because of his unlawful actions in dealing with the Native…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trail Of Tears Essay

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    But, Congress approved the treaty even though John Ross had 16,000 signatures on his petition to fight back the ruling. Only 2,000 Cherokees left their land for territory along the Mississippi River. New U.S. President Martin Van Buren appointed “General Winfield Scott and 7,000 soldiers to expedite the removal process. Scott and his troops forced the Cherokee into stockades at bayonet point while whites looted their homes and belongings.” Within that move, the soldiers “marched the Indians more than 1,200 miles to Indian territory.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays