Pucci, author of “Introduction: What Is a Father?”, analyzes and establishes the presence of four paternal beings with specific “ideal and imaginary foundations”(Pucci) within the play. Pucci also utilizes the irony of the dilemma by emphasizing Oedipus’ blindness to his own heinous crimes. Despite the presence of four father figures, who should have provided Oedipus with the guidance he needed in order to understand the truth, Oedipus is left to unknowingly venture down the path of justice,and in the end, he realizes it results in his doom and …show more content…
“Mock me with that if you like; you will find it true”(1325). By saying this, Teiresias addresses the fact that justice must be brought down upon Oedipus for his foolish actions and his particularly imprudent curse. While arguing with Teiresias, Oedipus scorns Teiresias’ use of riddles. Therefore, Teiresias mockingly reminds Oedipus of his encounter with the Sphinx and his ability to solve her clever riddles. Oedipus, then, boasts of his great ability to solve riddles through the use of his vast knowledge. However, Teiresias points out that Oedipus’ knowledge has kept him blind to the most devastating mystery of them all: Oedipus, in his search for justice, has damned himself into his own ruin and destruction. This exchange between Oedipus and Teiresias displays the difference between wisdom, which Teiresias possesses and respects, and plain knowledge, which Oedipus values and attempts to manipulate while obtaining justice. Furthermore, Teiresias reveals that it is Oedipus’ arrogance and faith in knowledge that leads him right down the path of justice and to his ultimate destruction. Although the downfall of Oedipus is undeniably tragic and full of misery, it can be observed that he brought his own undoing unto himself by trying to do the right thing. Not only does Oedipus unknowingly curse himself, but he also blatantly