William Appleman Williams The Tragedy Of American Diplomacy

Improved Essays
William Appleman Williams’ essay The Tragedy of American Diplomacy centers around America expansion, and the idealistic and economic motivators which inspired it. Williams frames his narrative with his critique of the idea that expansion was one of the main ways in which America could extend its virtues throughout the world, and create a new era of peace. He decides the true tragedy of American diplomacy is that actions undertaken in the name of humanitarianism, self determination, and peace actually work in opposition to those ideals and instead turn the United States into an oppressive force abroad. While the United States may have desired to help others, they believed the only way they could do so was if they maintained authority over the nations they helped. The reason this occurred, Williams argues, is because expansionism has a large role in American mythos but both policy makers and citizens refuse to reconcile expansion with the idea of becoming an empire. He examines …show more content…
Economic expansion became “both a means and an end” for American foreign policy makers (129). It was seen as a way to broaden markets, and to spread peace through prosperity. However, Williams explains, by expanding a U.S. economic system throughout the world they made it very difficult for other countries to maintain an economy independently (15). U.S. interference altered the power dynamic in other countries, which was usually detrimental to the other nations. Williams notes that other countries were also very well aware of this power imbalance, which furthered the tensions between the U.S. and other political bodies. Yet no matter how much the smaller nation fought, the power imbalance still existed, and the powerful U.S. superpower could easily destroy and terrorize those who fought against it. It was only until another world superpower came into the picture that smaller nations were able to fight

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In recent years, the United States has increasingly been sought to administer aid to foreign countries, both militarily and economically. The Obama Administration has made efforts to reframe foreign policy regarding U.S. aid as not only a moral issue, but also one to strengthen America’s security and economic conditions. When looking at the history of American foreign policy, it is obvious that we act in selfish ways; practicing whatever policy we seem fit at that given time. Although American foreign policy did not always stay consistent, I believe the intentions of the U.S. were consistent, always looking out to develop economic gains. The United States has taken leadership roles in peacemaking across the globe, and as a world leader has practiced their self proclaimed duty as, ‘democracy defenders,’ whether you want our help, or…

    • 2315 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the years of 1895-1920, America had started to move towards the idea of getting involved with foreign places. With the closing of the frontier, America had started to search for a type of ‘new frontier’ that they could conquer. The factor most important in driving American foreign policy in this time was self-interest. While idealism played a role when America felt the need to help foreign countries, it was ultimately self-interest that led America to take actions in foreign policy. Self- interest is shown when Senator Albert J. Beveridge claims in a speech that America was in need for new markets to get new resources from and to sell to for more trade.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the late 19th and 20th centuries, there were various conflicts about overseas expansion. Pro-imperialists and anti-imperialists displayed different outlooks and brought forth controversy. Military strength was (and still is) very important to show a form of dominance. The idea of imperialism was seen as positive and negative towards military strength, expanding it, but also spreading it too thin was seen as an issue. Although views of US imperialism often tended to agree with one another, there are more differences than there are similarities.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    III. Critical Response to Alice H. Amsden’s Thesis At the heart of Escape from Empire, Amsden explains how shifts in American policy between the First and Second American Empire were a detriment to the development of the Third World. More specifically, Amsden’s thesis is that because of American policy rigidity, the Third World could be better suited for development if it cultivates self-determined policy. It is from this dichotomy between progressively driven policies and ideologically driven policies that Amsden theorizes a third American Empire: an ideal regime that promotes equitable policy regardless of economic, geographic or ideological status.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Latin America Dbq

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We can assess the position of U.S. in world affairs, especially in Latin America, by looking at our history and how our country is today. Back in the late 1800s - early 1900s, was the beginning of the supremacy of the United States. From industrialization, to imperialism, to economics and politics. The United States has a huge impact on the world as well as the world has impacted America.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1895-1920s Dbq Essay

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What typically motivates people to do anything? Self-Interest, and America did not fall short of this characteristic throughout the following years: 1895-1920. There were always hidden causes in America’s actions such as land, money, and power, which were strong influences in the young World Power’s influences. This is evident through the imperialistic nature of America always growing and needing somewhere to further its claws, the demand from the ever growing economic system, and the power that radiated from the growing nation, and even the president. Once America became aware of its strength, the wish to ‘expand’ became merely only a part of America’s natural tendency.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foreign policy is an important feature that can change the outlook a country has on the world. This very topic was a particularly controversial issue during the late 19th century and early 20th century in the United States. The public was divided and it aroused great debate among the American people. It was a question of whether to uphold imperialist ideas or to sustain an isolationist agenda. Looking back on that time, one can see the shift from expansionism to isolationism in American foreign policy over a 20 year period.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover the United States expanded upon a long history of explorations, trade, and cultural exchange to practice something new that looked much like an empire . Economic expansion reinforced and impaired the United States and its population during world war one. The impact of economic expansion in the experience of the United States during world war one was not only necessary but proved essential in many ways. For example, a reinforced and expanded military were vital for economic expansion. The United States had long been involved in Pacific commerce with American ships traveling to China since the late 1700’s .…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is argued from two sides about the idea of U.S. Imperialism, an expression of nationalism by taking over and colonizing regions, which took place in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Consensus has argued that U.S. imperialism was a “righteous” path and completely justified. On the other end of the argument, lays the Conflict perspective, which views U.S. behavior of Imperialism as an example of European “empire building.” The Spanish-American War and the Philippine-American War are two examples of conflicts that occurred during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Conflict theorists would insist that these wars broke out due to the consequences of Imperialism.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late 19th century and early 20th century, the United States went to great lengths to expand its influence overseas. Fueled by the belief in imperialism, America expanded its global powers to Central America to places such as Puerto Rico, Panama, and the Philippines. The issue of whether or not the U.S should annex the Philippines struck a controversy and led to varying opinions of U.S expansion among Americans. Different understandings of America's identity as "the land of the equal" as opposed to a superior power among other countries, defined America's contrasting views of U.S overseas expansion. Americans in desperate need to justify U.S overseas expansion turned to religion to support their claims that the U.S must annex the Philippines.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the beginning of his term, President Woodrow Wilson had not been an advocate of aggressive foreign policies since he detested Imperialism. Along with his Secretary of State, William Jennings Bryan, Wilson believed in a foreign policy called “moralistic diplomacy”, which based foreign decisions on moral as opposed to material values. Uprisings in Latin America called for the use of this policy to spread democratic values, but the negative effects of moralistic diplomacy overshadowed this idealistic view. Although Wilson’s foreign policy protected American securities in Latin America, moralistic diplomacy mainly caused prolonged hostilities between the United States and Latin America. Lastly, Wilson’s policy was concerned with promoting…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States has always considered itself a shining city on a hill, a place that makes the rest of the world better. This is the narrative that many Americans have been sold, that whenever the United States intervenes, it is always for the better of not only that country, but the rest of the world. In spite of this narrative, the United States has not always had the best intentions, and many of their interventions have left lives and countries in ruin. Many of the darker parts of American interventionism come to bear in the book Empire’s Workshop by Greg Grandin, which discusses American imperialism in Latin America. Despite the fact that this book assumes a certain level of expertise on United States policy in Latin America, it is still…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative Statement The current interventionist foreign policy that has driven the U.S. to accept an overwhelming amount of responsibility for maintaining the global order -- a commitment of such great magnitude that it should not be the burden of a single state, even a superpower such as the U.S. that “dominate[s] the world militarily, economically, and politically” (Posen 117). Emboldened by assumptions of American geopolitical strengths, the U.S. has pursued nation-building operations that serve as a detriment to both the federal budget and their international reputation. Instead, a return to the pre-WWII foreign policy of offshore balancing would reallocate resources from futile nation-building exercises towards preserving American dominance…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    US Foreign Policy Essay

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Mandelbaum believes that U.S foreign Policy has failed since the end of the cold war through different factors. Mandelbaum makes a strong case ideologically crusading into regime change, which invariably fails regardless of how virtuous the intent is. We first need to define what foreign policy and the cold war is in order to evaluate Mandelbaum and whether he thinks U.S. foreign policy has failed or not. He mentions that the years of 1991-2014 were very distinct from any previous period in American history and prior to this odd time period, the U.S foreign policy focused on the nation's security, rather than transforming other countries’ domestic arrangements. Foreign Policy or foreign affairs is explained as a government’s strategy in dealing with other nations to safeguard its national interests to achieve certain goals within its international relations(CITE).…

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Berger, Easterly, Nunn, and Satyanath article “Commercial Imperialism?” once again takes a different route in determining what compels a state to participate in international trade. Focusing on US exports they find that political influence from CIA interventions were used to increase demand for US products in areas where there was a comparative disadvantage. In their study the independent variable is the level US government influence on other states and the dependent variable is the annual bilateral trade level between the US and said state. They measure international trade (using the gravity model) between the US and states in which the CIA has either installed a new leader or supported the one currently in power.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays