Values And Values Of Science

Improved Essays
Science is a collaborative effort founded upon the curiosity innate in all humans. This curiosity drove us to create systems of inquiry to satisfy our need to explain things. Adopting the tools and values of science would benefit society as a whole. The tools of science are not the focus of my discussion here, as I believe that, while vital to science, they are not as universally useful within society as the values they were built upon. The values of science are not merely a prerequisite to implementing these tools, but do themselves foster curiosity and the drive to seek answers to one 's problems. Kuhn and Thagard each provide some shared values or practices of a scientific community that they view as vital components of science. Science …show more content…
The tools of science are not the apparati with which science is executed, such as scales and telescopes, nor the theories science generates to explain things, though both are useful instruments in their own right. I refer instead to the habitual processes which science relies upon. The most prominent tool is the scientific method which serves to direct one 's inquiry. Other useful tools include gathering data, controlling for variables, and repeating experiments. When I talk about the values of science, I believe that they are the result of scientific communities attempting to define how to reach their goals, which I will argue further when discussing Kuhn’s values. Science is a process through which a community generates knowledge, not a collection of facts. I distinguish between the conclusions of science, and the process by which they were arrived …show more content…
The values Kuhn lists as “characteristics of a good scientific theory” (Kuhn 95) that the scientific community uses to judge which theories can become part of their shared knowledge base illuminate the reasons that the practice of science is persistent. The characteristics he lists by which to judge a theory (accurate, consistent, broad scope, simple, and fruitful of new research) point to underlying values of science. The first two point to assumptions that science is based upon: that the universe can in fact be described with accuracy, and that such descriptions will be true and consistent regardless of circumstance. I feel that the last three characteristics that Kuhn lists say more about human nature, and hint at why we do science. The desire for broad scope, that “a theory’s consequences should extend far beyond the particular observations, laws, or sub theories it was initially designed to explain” (95), and for simplicity, where we seek to order disparate phenomena into logical groups, point to a desire for completeness, for some theory that is broad enough to explain the entire universe. When explaining his fifth value, fruitfulness, Kuhn states that a theory should generate new research by “disclos[ing] new phenomena or previously united relationships among those already known” (95). This final value is somewhat self-serving, valuing theories that will lead to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” by Naomi Oreskes, the presenter describes what makes science so unique, and distinguishes it from other fields such as religion. Oreskes claims that science is an appeal to authority, but unlike other similar appeals, it is the collective authority of a group of people, somewhat like a community. Throughout her speech, she conveys to her audience different examples of historical figures who worked in science, and uses them as proofs to help understand the point that she is making. In doing so, she describes that what makes this specific field so special, is the fact that science itself, and the ways that one tries to test a theory on a specific subject are not related; but rather, as was said by Paul Feyerabend…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One might overlook that Science and Technology go hand in hand. They function as a pair to create the world we live in today. Oscar Handlin shows us this in his writing, Science and Technology of Popular culture. He explores the depth of these and what misconceptions come along with them. The traditions of Science and Technology have been practiced for many years.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Angier continuously shows her interest in science through her descriptions of the topic, Martin is not as animated. By calling science “a dynamic process of discovery” (Angier 490) and a “humbling activity” (Angier 491), Angier’s attitude towards science is uplifting and cheerful, which reveals her joy in studying and discussing the topic. In opposition, Martin uses a more factual tone to describe his topic, making his article not nearly as personal as Angier’s essay. Readers are captivated by reading an article when the author is passionate about the topic. Because of the stark contrast in the authors’ writing styles, the essays have differing…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Skorton, in the article “Why Scientists Should Embrace Liberal Arts”, argues that scientists must supplement their science and engineering education with a study of the humanities to effectively inform the populous. Through the humanities, Skorton believes scientists can develop a better understanding of the human conditions, thus better emotionally connecting with people lacking a scientific background. Skorton’s article contributes a perspective towards solving a larger problem of the drift between the scientific community and the general public’s perception of scientific truth, particularly the scientific truths that inform politically charged debates. Skorton effectively aggrandizes the scientific community as potential saviors of…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The sharp contrast created between the world as it is habitually seen and how a scientist sees it reveals how unclear and indeterminate the scientific process is. Being so different from how most people see the world, it is as if the perspective of a scientist is one that has pulled from a children’s fantasy novel, characterizing the world of science as unpredictable and even fantastical. Looking at the world through a scientific lends warps one’s perspective of it, allowing for the exploration of the fine details of life through science. In conclusion, everything becomes an opportunity for discovery and everything that seemed to be set in stone can still be…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, science is not discussed in the in the context of a profession. The author makes the connection of science as the search for new questions. In the book we read that “scientist don’t concentrate on what they know” more “on what they don’t” (Firestein, 2012, p. 14). Provided that observation is correct, we find that science is considered in a broader…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the mid-19th century, a young child by the named of Henry Augustus Rowland was developing his own desires for fundamental research. These ambitions were fueled by the complications he faced as a result of his religious family. Employing his adversity, Rowland later advanced to become a renowned scientist to revolutionize not only the design of spectroscopy but also the perception of scientific research in the late 19th century. He redirected his suppressions of the world to further develop this study of “pure science,” the understanding that science should focus on research for the advancement of knowledge. This concept of science had been forgotten and masked by the working world of the 19th century.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his 1942 writing "The Normative Structure of Science," Robert K Merton outlines the four "Ethos of Science" - principles he believes should always be upheld in order to ensure good scientific practices. These four principles are Universalism, Communism, Disinterestedness, and Organized Skepticism. Universalism is the idea that a scientist should reject all their individual differences in favor of having an understanding, all-considering, objective view on the world. Communism is the idea that all scientific knowledge and progress is shared, and that a scientist should strive to make scientific progress for the greater good and fame rather than capital gain. Disinterestedness means that a scientist should have high moral integrity, putting themselves last and…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book inspired by the subject of his previous book, The Copernican revolution and the following events. Kuhn developed a theory established upon the nature of scientific progress which he based upon the profound advancements which signal a paradigm shift. Kuhn was an American physicist, historian and philosopher in the sciences. Kuhn’s main following contained philosophers and sociologists of science whose primary are was understanding the nature of scientific advancements and modernism. All that was required to bring upon the period of the Scientific Revolution was educated scholars, who were using the knowledge gained by artisans from the Renaissance who had discovered accurate and detailed knowledge of the physical world.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He claims that scientists holding differing theories work within opposing paradigms. A paradigm provides a framework that allows its adherents to engage in the puzzle solving practices of that discipline. This puzzle solving practice is what he referred to as ‘normal science’, where the adherents of the paradigm do not take anomalous data as refutation but rather a problem to be solved using the tools of the paradigm. Kuhn disambiguates the two distinct ways in which he uses the word paradigm with regard to science. The broader first sense of the word as used by Kuhn is the ‘disciplinary matrix’ consisting of several components one of which is the exemplar, which he considers to be the more specific use of the…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Popper, any theory can be proven false through empirical evidence or experimental data but cannot be proven true. In this view, any theory is always in the state of being not yet disproved. However, Kuhn thinks that in normal science the theory is not questioned until “the crisis stage” in the Kuhn Cycle. Kuhn claims that scientists does not try to refute their theories instead they try to prove them and seek evidence for their theories whereas Popper claims that scientists try to…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Sister's Keeper Theory

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Science is the discipline focused on understanding the natural world. Specifically, science is “the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment” (Oxford Dictionary). In order to comprehend how the natural world functions, it is essential to assess the different hypotheses, or ideas generated from empirical observations of the natural world, through experimentation. If the hypothesis is validated through the series of experiments, it will become a theory. The theory, or a broad statement about relationships in the natural world, aids in our understanding of the world bias-free.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern society, science plays a key role in the formation of the ideology and…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the past centuries, the topics of realism and anti-realism have been on ongoing debate amongst philosophers. Both perspectives have been revisited time after time, citing different reasons for the existence of each belief. These two topics belong to the area of philosophy, more specifically, metaphysics. Metaphysics explores the nature of existence, exploring why things exist and how they came to exist in the first place. Philosophers argue that it is the foundation behind philosophy, answering questions about the existence of the world, that if left unanswered would hinder our perception and grasp of reality.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kuhn himself defines paradigms by using two criteria: “Sufficiently unprecedented to attract and enduring group of adherents” and “they are open-ended, with plenty of problems for the “redefined group of practitioners to resolve (Kuhn, 2012, Introductory essay).” Under…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays