Globalization is in its orientation to maximize profits and the threat of global quality of life on the planet, especially in transition countries. Regardless of the negative aspects of globalization, its appearance should be accepted as a challenge for the possibilities it offers in economic development and growth. Understanding international political economies can be based on three basic perspectives promptly applied by the United States and the Great Britain. These three dominant perspectives fall under the category of liberalism, mercantilism, and structuralism. According to Balaam (2014), the relationships between these three structures include distinctions that are influenced with distinction arbitrary disciplinary tradition and differentiating times, and from a further analysis liberalism stands out as the peak of globalization.
The seemingly paradoxical idea that the individual liberals and advocates …show more content…
US may have weakened in terms of its relative economic strength, but they sharply increased ability to influence the world economy, such as global predator. If things could be considered only in terms of strength or weakness. The political and military involvement of the United States to maintain the economy, mainly primary resources, and the fight is lost American character, to the extent that the US economy, thanks to foreign investment and the overall global framework, is losing its national character. Then, if the EU Japan and, ultimately, China, also actors of globalization, the question is whether globalization has exclusively liberal character? Or, if you are a liberal economy and politics, as well as drivers of globalization, in general, the only cause of third world poverty, or to the guilty should be sought, again, in the collectivist demagoguery and totalitarianism local monopolistic